Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 01:57pm PT
|
Keep deflecting and attacking.
haha, that is your only method of discussion.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:01pm PT
|
bout as compelling as .06 of i degree... no doubt.
and Ron is back with his claim of 0.06 of a degree. I still don't know why he talk about that number.
|
|
monolith
climber
SF bay area
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:12pm PT
|
LOL, so it's all about winning and losing on an internet forum.
Ron, Sketch has declared you the winner. Congratulations.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:15pm PT
|
Then Ron wins.
haha, one of the skeptical trolls says I loose.
So what is that number?
|
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:29pm PT
|
If you're going to call America your home at least learn to speak and write the language properly Phule.
By many accounts the .6C 20th century rise is the sum total, before "adjustment" of data, Ron is as correct as anyone since it really can't precisely be known.
Ed, by saying Chief, Sketch, Ron, etc. don't understand the material, is demonstrating the intellectual arrogance that more than any other single aspect of this debate is turning the tide of public opinion against CAGW science/religion. It's really not that complicated if you become aware, and keep in mind, the underlying ideology and funding mechanism of picking the pockets of the populace. Their are many holes in the theory and the community of practitioners can't plug the holes fast enough that are often identified in the 66.4% of papers not explicitly endorsing AGW for primary causation of climate change.
|
|
monolith
climber
SF bay area
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:32pm PT
|
.06 != .6
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:35pm PT
|
If you're going to call America your home at least learn to speak and write the language properly Phule.
Sorry, but you are really a stupid idiot that lives in a fantasy land. I don't live in America, I have never said that I live in America, I only post on the forum during European day time, I have said that I live in Europe.
Do you understand or are you really to stupid to listen to other people?
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:37pm PT
|
By many accounts the .6C 20th century rise is the sum total, before "adjustment" of data, Ron is as correct as anyone since it really can't precisely be known.
What a complete idiot. Learn to read before posting on internet forums or is the problem that you don't understand numbers at all?
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:40pm PT
|
Ed, by saying Chief, Sketch, Ron, etc. don't understand the material, is demonstrating the intellectual arrogance that more than any other single aspect of this debate is turning the tide of public opinion against CAGW science/religion. It's really not that complicated if you become aware,
What a complete idiot. Your post prove without a doubt that none of you grasp the science at all. You don't even understand the difference between 0.06 and 0.6.
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:45pm PT
|
Come on Phule... EVERYONE is a Merkin... because these dipshits can't imagine a world outside their own limited experience.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 02:54pm PT
|
Keep trolling.
I am sure that you at least are not going to explain why Ron talk about 0.06 degrees.
|
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:06pm PT
|
Thanks for elaborating your non residency Fool. I don't read any of your posts other than those on the immediate pages before my response, so i was unaware of your nationality. Still, if you are going to participate in an american discussion forum please learn how to not mangle the language. Who cares if Ron made a typo in adding a zero, his intent is clear from repeated quotation of that figure. Now what the hell are you doing discussing theory and policy that has profound implications for our economy-why don't you concentrate on screwing up your own state buffoon.
|
|
Cragar
climber
MSLA - MT
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:07pm PT
|
LOL, so it's all about winning and losing on an internet forum.
The common denominator of all trolls. Obvious to me that it is elementary behavior that most learn to break somewhere between 5 or 7th grade.
Quite simple and easy to avoid; the writings of a troll that is.
|
|
Wade Icey
Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:17pm PT
|
Ed, by saying Chief, Sketch, Ron, etc. don't understand the material, is demonstrating the intellectual arrogance that more than any other single aspect of this debate is turning the tide of public opinion against CAGW science/religion.
No.
Ed, by saying Chief, Sketch, Ron, etc. don't understand the material, is saying that Chief, Sketch, Ron, etc. don't understand the material.
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:19pm PT
|
Thanks for elaborating your non residency Fool. I don't read any of your posts other than those on the immediate pages before my response, so i was unaware of your nationality.
But that didn't stop you for using your fantasy and making up stuff. It is of course the same way you do when "reading" science. You just make up stuff that fits you political view.
Who cares if Ron made a typo in adding a zero, his intent is clear from repeated quotation of that figure.
I asked him because he has made the same point several times in the past. I don't believe that it was a typo.
Now what the hell are you doing discussing theory and policy that has profound implications for our economy-why don't you concentrate on screwing up your own state buffoon.
So I am not allowed to discuss science that are important for all the world on an American forum?
|
|
raymond phule
climber
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:37pm PT
|
And then there's Wade, Mono, Mal, Fortmental, mecrist, dirtbag, pitydaphule...
That understands the material?
|
|
mechrist
Gym climber
South of Heaven
|
|
|
Mar 10, 2014 - 03:43pm PT
|
.6,, .06,,.000006 ... Meh~~~
ah, "science" at its best.
I wonder how the antiscience dipshits feel about Neumann vs Dirichlet boundary conditions.
Meh, as long as we are within 5 orders of magnitude it is all the same, right?
Fuking idiots.
|
|
k-man
Gym climber
SCruz
|
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 10, 2014 - 05:25pm PT
|
Climate alarmist assh0les?
Hey Sketch, what do you think the chance is that within the next couple of years, the science will prove itself out and we "Climate alarmist assh0les" will be looking a the bunch of you, the deniers, and asking "why do you deny the science so?"
For certain, there's a crowd on this thread that is really going to look like a pack of schmaltz, and I have a hunch that it won't be the crowd that bases their beliefs on verifiable science.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!