KXL pipeline

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 121 - 140 of total 399 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 6, 2014 - 12:28pm PT
Problem solved!

Just build your own fusion reactor.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the-diy-engineer-who-built-a-nuclear-reactor-in-his-basement
karen roseme

Mountain climber
san diego
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 6, 2014 - 03:57pm PT
TGT,

Sounds a little sketchy, but brilliant.

I like this post of yours too, about the carbon eating fishes


http://phys.org/news/2014-02-fish-biomass-ocean-ten-higher.html#inlRlv
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 6, 2014 - 04:19pm PT
BTW,

Your drinking water is filtered thru processed coke. (activated carbon) although it's usually derived from bituminous coal, primarily from China or anthracite from those evil underground mines in Virginia.

Petroleum derived carbon is too valuable for metallurgical processing and electrode carbon. The particle shape makes it better for those uses than producing carbon for water purification and odor control, but chemically it's the same thing, Carbon.

Right now there's a world wide shortage of filtration carbon. The two largest suppliers of it have already sold out their production capacity for the entire year and are not taking new orders.

JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 6, 2014 - 04:33pm PT
Interesting info on filtration carbon, TGT. About 40 years ago, I was working as an analyst in the corporate planning department of a manufacturer of filtration equipment, and we were evaluating the possible acquisition of a major producer of activated charcoal. We concluded the ROI was inferior to other options. It looks like we may have been myopic . . . (perhaps tying into Tvash's comments, above).

John
Tvash

climber
Seattle
Mar 6, 2014 - 04:36pm PT
I've switched to a carbon free diet to reduce emissions.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Mar 6, 2014 - 05:04pm PT
I've switched to a carbon free diet to reduce emissions.

Good one, Tvash! Now everyone in my office is trying to figure out what has me chortling when I'm otherwise supposed to be putting out a rush project.


I suppose if all humanity followed that diet, we could also solve our overpopulation problems, too.

John
Hoser

climber
vancouver
Mar 6, 2014 - 05:33pm PT
The Canadians just approved the line 9 reversal, allowing the pipeline to ship synthetic crude to the east coast. This will encourage more growth of the oil sands, will be interesting to see what the folks in the east have to say
Tvash

climber
Seattle
Mar 6, 2014 - 05:40pm PT
All the carbon my body needs is contained in my cold, black cinder of a heart.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 6, 2014 - 06:05pm PT
How do you get the carbon?

What's coke?

You coke coal, wood chips or coconut hulls, but the ends result is almost pure carbon. Then it goes thru the activation process.

For not using anthracite, MWD sure buys a lot of it. So does any one with a GE mixed bed filter.

http://www.gewater.com/handbook/ext_treatment/ch_6_filteration.jsp

Has to meet NSF 61 though

http://www.throop.com/filter-media-anthracite-coal.php

http://www.anthracitefilter.com/water_filtration_products.htm

As for Activated carbon its used both in the PAC process, (Powder activated carbon) and GAC filter vessels. (Granulated activated carbon)

Your icemaker filter or Britta filter is also just an activated carbon filter. The good ones use coconut hull derived carbon.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 6, 2014 - 06:30pm PT
It's also used extensively for drinking water filtration. That's the bulk of the filtration market.

All the MWD plants use anthracite filters.

https://vendors.planetbids.com/NETConnect/ebidresults.cfm?BidNo=300&Name=Filtration+Coal+and+Sand

Last bid result 670 tons @ $388 per ton

2 Coal, Anthracite, Uniformity Coefficient Not More Than 1.40, 1.00 To 1.10 Millimeter Effective Size in accordance to MWD Specification EF-SPEC/11 Weymouth Unit attached. Ton 670 $388.62 $260,375.40
karen roseme

Mountain climber
san diego
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 7, 2014 - 04:12pm PT




karen roseme

Mountain climber
san diego
Topic Author's Reply - Mar 9, 2014 - 11:02pm PT
http://action.sierraclub.org/site/PageNavigator/NAT_KXL_Petition.htm?gclid=CNW-n-H8hr0CFRQV7AodcCoAsA


The fight to stop Keystone XL is in its final stretch. Sign this petition to help us fight the devastation of our wild places and make sure this pipeline is stopped for good.
philo

Trad climber
Is that light the end of the tunnel or a train?
Mar 9, 2014 - 11:52pm PT
Keep up the good fight Karen. I support your efforts here.
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Mar 9, 2014 - 11:57pm PT
Likewise.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Mar 9, 2014 - 11:59pm PT
Hey, Karen, F*#k off!!!!

Focus on the marine mammals. Would you rather buy Saudi oil or Canadian oil?

Pick one. Stop making stupid statements that aren't based in facts. Saudi Arabia, or Canada?
Tvash

climber
Seattle
Mar 10, 2014 - 10:55am PT
Keystone supporters often frame the argument this way - Saudi or Canada? In other words, Terrorists or Our Friendly Next Door Neighbors?

The reality is that the US imports petroleum products from over 50 countries. The share of those imports from Canada and OPEC (11 states - not all of them Middle Eastern) is about equal at just under a third each. Saudi Arabia itself supplies only about 12% of our petroleum products imports.

The Keystone opposition has decided that preventing climate disaster trumps whatever geopolitical concerns, real or imagined, are involved with oil importation. That strikes me as a reasonable set of priorities - favoring the health of the entire biosphere over...what, exactly? Last time I checked Saudi Arabia, despite its regressive domestic policies, has been a stable country that has been friendly to the US for many decades.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 10, 2014 - 11:05am PT
There are 2.6 MILLION miles of oil and gas pipelines in the USA

Keystone adds 862.
MH2

climber
Mar 10, 2014 - 11:09am PT
Then not building it shouldn't be a big deal.
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Mar 10, 2014 - 11:22am PT
You guys are all being suckered by one billionare donor that wants to maintain his railroad's monopoly on moving Canadian crude.




The crude won't stop shipping. It will just go on his trains.
Tvash

climber
Seattle
Mar 10, 2014 - 11:36am PT
Another strawman propaganda item designed to 'guilt trip' opponents of climate destroying oil sands production. Keystone will add capacity - oil and dilbit will ship by both the existing means (trains owned by Evil Robber Barons That Are Far, Far Worse Than the Kochs Will Ever Be), AND the new pipeline. It's not either/or. Strip mining in the oil sands will increase accordingly.

The length of Keystone is also meaningless by itself. What Keystone does is to connect the Oil Sands province with refineries in the Gulf, Chicago, and Midwest - increasing access to refining capacity for both crude and finished petroleum products from the oil sands province.

Messages 121 - 140 of total 399 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta