Abort Abortion?

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 121 - 140 of total 194 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 09:47pm PT
There is nothing metaphysical about it. Living life requires that we make distinctions and choices that have real consequences in the real world. Freedom of speech risks that I may say something that hurts you. The right to bear arms results in the death of four children each day and the injury of about 15,000 per year. In the case of a woman's right of freedom and privacy it means that fetuses are often killed.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 09:48pm PT
The first diminishment of man was the subjugatation of woman.
stinky

climber
Guymon OK
Mar 6, 2006 - 09:55pm PT
In your argument to preserve this freedom, I fear your style of argumentation harms your cause. To deny the real questions raised by the anti-abortion movement alienates the clueless center that ultimately decides American politics. To argue that a fetus has no soul before birth is extreme as those who argue that the soul is present at conception. The legislative reality today lies between these two points. I fear that your inability to engage the opposing view point only serves to weaken your own policy goals.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 09:55pm PT
How ever ill-advised, the point at which a fetus lives unassisted by a woman's body for the purpose of life it should be treated as a child and afforded those same inalienable rights. That said, the ability to keep the dying artificially alive for years and the premature viable months before a natural birth are both medical "advances" not without perils of their own.
maculated

Trad climber
San Luis Obispo, CA
Mar 6, 2006 - 09:57pm PT
I used to be staunchly anti-abortion. My mother was adopted (and it was secret) by my grandfather when my grandmother got knocked up during WWII. I was 16 years after my last sibling. Both of us were abortion candidates and my mother and grandmother's faiths kept us from being aborted.

At the same time, who am I to say how valuable my life is compared to that of what could have been for my mother? Or how much my grandmother suffered for having brought my mom into the world?

The true reason for my pro-choice stance is simply that women will continue to abort unwanted fetuses in unsavory ways that could hurt them, render the child alive but severely dysfunctional, what have you.

Should partial birth abortion stand? I think not.

But I am too relativistic to say I'm right or wrong. Religion is solipsistic - it puts humanity above any other thing out there, and it puts familiar humanity above that. If we can work on a way to save poor young mothers from creating the same trap for their children, then we can talk about banning abortion with a clear conscience.
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Mar 6, 2006 - 10:04pm PT
"To deny the real questions raised by the anti-abortion movement"

Don't kid yourself or me - they don't have questions - they have a religious agenda bent on compromising and infringing upon the rights of women. Again, a woman's right to freedom and privacy are non-negotiable. I will gladly discuss the issue ad nausem, but will never depart from that position. Any departure from that position would be to allow the imposition of some degree of tyranny upon women that I personally will always resist.

It's simple and the same as it ever was - don't have an abortion if you don't want one. The minute you start telling me or mine what we can and can't do with our bodies you open yourself up to the same in ways you may not yet understand. For the Right it is a deeply hypocritical position that shows how badly the Republican party has been shanghied by religious fanatics.
Spinmaster K-Rove

Trad climber
Stuck Under the Kor Roof
Mar 6, 2006 - 10:56pm PT
"Yeah, the showdown is coming and it won't be a pretty day for Roe v. Wade supporters."


A huge number of Republican supporters are pro-choice. My grandmother is blindly, foaming-at-the-mouth Republican and so pro-choice it isn't funny. If Roe V Wade were to get overturned I believe we would see a MASSIVE shift in our legislative representation. Americans are complacent until the house is actually on fire....and then watch out.
dirtbag

climber
Mar 6, 2006 - 11:04pm PT
Maybe it will be the wake-up call that this nation needs.
Spinmaster K-Rove

Trad climber
Stuck Under the Kor Roof
Mar 6, 2006 - 11:38pm PT
A lot of time and attention is paid to the minutia of the abortion argument. When is a fetus viable, when does life begin, etc etc. These concerns are not without substance, but what seems to be constantly overshadowed is the general public health concerns of the abortion issue. Abortion is as old as societal judgement about pregnancy. When abortion is illegal and it is illegal for a woman to get a safe abortion, abortions may reduce in number, but they certainly do not vanish. Instead, women find them selves in a sitation where they must find illegal back-alley procedures and women become permanently injured and die. Of course the poor women who are most likely to afford the most dangerous illegal methods of abortion suffer the most.

Regardless of the moral implications of abortion, until we create a society in which no woman need fear having a child not want for support, abortion needs to be safe and legal. If the anti-abortion movement spent half its energy streamlining the adoption process and on sex eduction they would find abortions decline much faster than their current methodology.

Nobody likes the idea of abortion.
WBraun

climber
Mar 7, 2006 - 12:14am PT
hahaha

Hey where'd everybody go again .....

Oh oh, so you guys are saying a fetus has no rights?

I say it has the same rights as everyone else. It can be terminated at will at any time but one will suffer the consequences of such an action. Not by some religious fanatics nor by the govt. nor by any law except the Lord himself.

Oh? You said he doesn't exsist?

We will see who is right.

Independent free will to choose is the inalienable right of all living beings, but still we must carry the consequences of our actions, right or wrong.
Spinmaster K-Rove

Trad climber
Stuck Under the Kor Roof
Mar 7, 2006 - 01:39am PT
A fetus is an extension of it's mother, I'm pretty sure that's why we call it a fetus and not a child. All living things have rights but we draw lines around them.

Bush wants people to adopt unused embryos from fertility clinics...what other parts of reproduction gook have rights? Does every sperm have the right to inseminate an egg? Does every egg have the right to be inseminated?
WBraun

climber
Mar 7, 2006 - 01:45am PT
The individual soul is within the fetus.

Sperm is the carrier (vehicle) for the soul to enter the mother.

Without understanding the science of the soul, everything in this whole thread is useless.
wydra

Social climber
Utah
Mar 7, 2006 - 01:49am PT
Republican Wing-Nuts love to claim that life begins at conception. The situation I pose to them is this.

Suppose you are in a burning building, to your left is a petri dish five fertalized eggs, this building is a invitro fertalization clinic, in the corner is a two year old child. who do you save? the two year old child or the five 'children' in the petri dish?
WBraun

climber
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:04am PT
Stupid analogy

Both can be saved easily at the same time. Not that it has any real significance to this subject matter whatsoever.
Spinmaster K-Rove

Trad climber
Stuck Under the Kor Roof
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:06am PT
Werner, while spiritual beliefs are important for personal decisions they don't make good public policy, which is what the the 'abortion issue' is and what the Supreme Court decides. I personally believe that you have the right to mkae decisions based on your spirirtual beliefs and tell others about them. Other people do not.
WBraun

climber
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:18am PT
They don't make good public policy

Yes so true Spin.

We have fallen, everything will become the machine, robots.

wydra

Social climber
Utah
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:27am PT
you do not have time can only choose one or the other.

I can see why you would not want to answer due to the implications.

perfect analogy. thanks.
WoodyS

Trad climber
Riverside
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:27am PT
Poll after poll has made it clear that the majority of Americans favor abortion with restrictions on the third tri-mester.
Any Constitutional Amendement proposal will have to be written taking that into consideration; otherwise it won't stand a chance.
The big mistake the pro-choice people have made over the years is to be adamant in maintaining a position that demands zero restrictions on abortion. As the years have passed, and more people have gained knowledge about the practice and details of late term abortion, the lower the percentage of Americans supporting abortion as it now stands. Further, the attacks by pro-abortion groups on anyone opposing the present situation has only increased this drop in support. Attacking those who want restrictions, calling them religious extremists is counter productive for the simple reason that most Americans don't like LTA and are not religious extremists. Pro-abortion extremists have been their own worst enemy.
Further, PA groups have also fought parent notification, minimum waiting periods etc. PA groups have gotten a reputation for attacking parental rights and for putting the government into what most Americans feel are their rights as parents, not government. I point this out, not to identify my position on these issues but to point out that the PA lobby has greatly irritated the majority in this country on numerous occasions.
I do favor an amendment for abortion with Third tri-mester restrictions. However, if the PA forces don't compromise a bit, and the same goes for those against abortion at all, we will end up with the states deciding individually.
We can debate rights all we want, but those rights will be determined by the courts, legislatures and voters.
WBraun

climber
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:33am PT
wydra

Whata mean I don't have time? Whata mean I have to choose?

I'm in that burning building dude, and I'm making the decisions at that moment rascal, while you are standing outside doing nothing but yaking, chicken shit!
George_W_Bush

Big Wall climber
Crawford, TX
Mar 7, 2006 - 02:57am PT
"Until birth when child can exist on it's own outside of a woman's body this is a clear case where every conservative should be saying "get and keep government out of our lives"


Well, using this ridiculous logic, then babies should be allowed to be aborted/murdered until they are five years old or so, maybe even older. I haven't seen any kid younger than that able to survive on its own. Those kids depend on the mother for every aspect of their survival.

I am so glad I got Scalito and Roberts in there. That will define the legacy of my Presidency along with the war on terror. Terrorism stifled and Roe v. Wade overturned. Scoreboard.
Messages 121 - 140 of total 194 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta