Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
monolith
climber
SF bay area
|
|
|
Feb 21, 2014 - 11:33pm PT
|
|
|
littlehammer
Mountain climber
Land of frozen crags
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2014 - 02:10am PT
|
you people are demented!
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2014 - 09:51am PT
|
The Chief
climber
From the Land of the Mongols
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2014 - 10:30pm PT
|
LOL...
Chief Pinocchio and his band of merry kooks are pretty desperate.
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2014 - 10:37pm PT
|
Can you at least post cartoons that are funny?
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
|
Feb 22, 2014 - 11:33pm PT
|
What and where are the errors in the data, rick?
|
|
bookworm
Social climber
Falls Church, VA
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 10:40am PT
|
"And there are some stories which do not have two sides. The climate change debate is one of them."
to claim, "the science is settled", is a mockery of science itself
former scientific truths:
the expansion of the universe is slowing
the dinosaurs were cold-blooded
the brontosaurus
nine planets in the solar system
there are three forms of matter
atoms are the smallest particles, etc.
the earth is warming because of human activity and that warming will cause catastrophic changes resulting in millions of deaths in 10...er, 20...oops...30...wait...50 years?
if, in fact, the science is settled, why are so many climate scientists still working as climate scientists? aren't your jobs now obsolete?
perhaps, they, like the great scientists of history who made their own advances through SKEPTICISM, are inspired to prove their predecessors wrong...i wish
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 10:50am PT
|
Fooking Idiot...^^^^^^^^
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 11:20am PT
|
LULZ to the max.
Now that is more in tune with the actual observed data on this website...
Carry on.
|
|
Wade Icey
Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 11:26am PT
|
Chef's ecofreak antiscientism contributions:
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA1111111!!!! RIIIIIGHHT1111!!!!! NNIIIIIIICE!!!!!!1111 GOT IT
Now that is more in tune with the actual observed data on this website...
|
|
Wade Icey
Trad climber
www.alohashirtrescue.com
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 11:31am PT
|
Chef's FACTUAL and REALISTIC contributions:
LOL
Total fking FAIL. HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! LOSER! Start sucking that water from your shetter
...I guess you deleted all your scatalogical studies...out for peer review?
Now that is more in tune with the actual observed data in the real scheme of the world...
Spot on! |
|
rick sumner
Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 12:27pm PT
|
Norton, I keep seeing posts from you asking Rick to provide proof the data used in CAGW theory is incorrect. First, off are you referring to Rick #1 (The Chief) or myself # 2? Second, are you challenging my assertion that " the reconstructed data and infills are erroneous", if so be more precise in your wording undersecretary? Until then, let me offer the following observation: increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations are a consequence of cyclical natural global warming much more so than anthropogenic release and this observation alone is enough to invalidate the theory if it was indeed "science" instead of a radical fundamentalist religion used to fund global cronyism. Let me elaborate somewhat- Despite many attempts, consuming platoons of determined fundamentalists and millions of dollars in public money, atmospheric CO2 concentrations are still accepted to rise and fall as a consequence of surface warming/cooling-a fact. In fact the portion of atmospheric CO2 attributable to man is in the 3-6% range, meaning 94-97% percent of the increase as measured by Mauna Loa is natural and overwhelmingly from ocean outgassing. Ocean outgassing of CO2 occurs much more readily in warmer waters, i.e. equatorial waters in which Mauna Loa sits close to. Cooler waters surrounding the poles readily absorb atmospheric CO2. Digest these facts, then consider the primary source of atmospheric CO2 concentrations of the indirectly observed past is from ice cores which were formed in an environment of considerably less CO2 concentrations than Mauna Loa. Therefore using these ice core reconstructions and projecting global atmospheric conditions of the past is a bit improper, unrepresentative of a global average, and adjustments to reflect global conditions from the past from this data is subject to gross bias by the fundamentalist fanatics of the global CAGW church of environmentalism and perpetual support of the scientifically lame that could find no other employ otherwise. There is much, much more, undersecretary Norton, but I fear I waste my breath in explanation to you.
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 12:46pm PT
|
First, off are you referring to Rick #1 (The Chief) or myself # 2? Second, are you challenging my assertion that " the reconstructed data and infills are erroneous
yes, that would be you, rick sumner I am constantly asking to come out and define, state just exactly what are the "errors in the data" that you said were there
you know, the "data" that are included in graphs, studies, etc that are used to support the position that the earth is warming overall
that you disagree with?
so yes, I am asking you rick sumer to show the errors, what and where the errors came about, and why you believe they are in error, or falsified, or whatever
ok, thank?
|
|
Norton
Social climber
the Wastelands
|
|
|
Feb 23, 2014 - 06:11pm PT
|
now that IS funny, Hurricane Michelle Bachman!
thanks for posting, WIlbeer
|
|
dirtbag
climber
|
|
|
Feb 24, 2014 - 08:41am PT
|
Yeah! And how dare WAPO for not publishing both sides of the "Earth is Round" debate!
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!