Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
BrentA
Gym climber
Roca Rojo
|
|
I just googled this thinking you were a nut...
Everywhere in the world is reporting it, with very few sources in the US following suit.
We are soooo fuqed.
|
|
immanti
climber
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Jan 7, 2007 - 02:14am PT
|
BrentA, I first posted this topic almost an hour ago for 10 seconds but nuked it immediately until I could find more than one source. Doesn't take long, does it?
|
|
N0_ONE
Social climber
Utah
|
|
Good!
|
|
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
We ought to help them!
We still owe Iran a Major-League Ass Kicking for holding Diplomats hostage '79-'81.
We let them (Iran) slide 25 years ago, and they're asking for it again today.
|
|
Mimi
climber
|
|
All they have to do is can their nuke program. Jeeze, you'd swear the world was asking them to like Sunnis or eat pork or something!
|
|
JuanDeFuca
Big Wall climber
Stoney Point
|
|
Sounds like a good idea, they did help knock down the twin towers.
JDF
|
|
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
I eat Pork, and I don't got a problem with Sunnis (American Sunnis).
|
|
BrentA
Gym climber
Roca Rojo
|
|
Interesting wording...
"Good""we still owe them"
I've thought Israel was the 51st state for some time, good to see the neocons are now agreeing.
|
|
Mimi
climber
|
|
Don't feed me that NPT BS. I'm writing you off if you defend these mullahs and believe it's okay for them to have the bomb.
|
|
Mimi
climber
|
|
Prevent what? If bombs are dropped on their facilities, it will destroy their program. Would you propose letting them continue and have an arsenal? What to do if they would then nuke their neighbors?
|
|
N0_ONE
Social climber
Utah
|
|
AC said..."As if we could prevent this by means of war..."
Yeah your right, lets try and reason withem!
|
|
Mimi
climber
|
|
You didn't answer my questions. I've tried to respond to yours.
|
|
WoodySt
Trad climber
Riverside
|
|
I've seen this info on a number of sites.
I just hope the Israelis do a good job of it. Maybe, we should do a second strike.
|
|
Mimi
climber
|
|
"Irans facilities are open to inspection."
That's BS, they're not.
"Iran has no nukes."
Not yet, but they're working on it, as they've made clear.
Iran could buy tactical nukes.
From who? NK is basically blockaded and we've got radioactive sensors in place all over the world to catch this type of traffic. The ex-Soviet Union countries are a concern, but the Russian mob would not be that stupid.
"If war is brought to Iran pre-emptively, they will have the sympathetic support of all Islam."
First accurate statement so far. This is an issue but we've been at war with these people for decades now. I'm all for it ending the sooner the better.
"Why would Iran nuke Israel, knowing the certainty of its own immediate demise?"
The mullahs are delusional. This is where your saner logic fails.
"What exactly is Iran in violation of in its stated intend to develope nuclear energy?"
Give me a break. You are this naive? And you ridicule Bushbots?!
"Do you think Karl Rove is handsome?"
You can shove KR up your a*#.
Thanks for answering. I hope we can continue with such productive dialogue. I have to go nighty night now. Sweet dreams!
|
|
Chaz
Trad climber
So. Cal.
|
|
I wouldn't believe anything on *wiki*pedia that I couldn't independently verify, and if you can collaborate it somewhere else, you don't need *wiki*pedia, now do you?
"Open Source", like *wiki*pedia, means any anonymous joker, like Rajmit, can make it say anything that comes into his fool head, for any reason. And if you cite it, you are a Dupe, and a Fool.
Check this out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_banned_users
It's a list of the Bozos who are Banned from contributing to *wiki*pedia. There are HUNDREDS of them!
Do you think they got themselves ran because they posted factual information?
Or do you think they were shown the door because the "info" they contributed was bullsh#t?
If you said "because the "info" they contributed was bullshit", you're a Winner!
Anybody can make *wiki*pedia say anything they want it to say, for any reason. So as a "Factual Source" *wiki*pedia's worse than useless!
|
|
WoodySt
Trad climber
Riverside
|
|
Crowley, the nurse is coming, time for bed.
|
|
K. Fosburg
Sport climber
park city, ut
|
|
I guess I still don't get it. Why are some countries justified in wielding WMDs and others must be prevented from doing so at all costs including preemptive war? Isn't this a blatant double standard that cannot be logically sustained?
|
|
philo
Trad climber
boulder, co.
|
|
Juan, How can you be so smart and so ignorant at the same time?
There has never been a verifiable connection between Iran and 911. Just like there was no connection between Iraq and 911. There was a huge connection between 911 and the Saudis. Shouldn't we pre-emptively nuke them?
To quote Mr. Frank Zappa, "why don't you bend up and sniff my anal vapours".
Regarding Israel's plans to nuke their neighbors I say we whole heartedly encourage them to GO FOR IT. That way they can't blame anyone else for their own destruction. It's called blow back check it out.
|
|
BrentA
Gym climber
Roca Rojo
|
|
Thankyou Mr. Fosburg,
I am not the only "crazy" person out there.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|