|
Jan 16, 2014 - 11:00am PT
|
You fear mongering TARDS are worse then them "Rapture freaks".
You are screaming constant other babbling bullshet that has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
My god, the taliban chieftain, our one practicing ayatollah of CO2 scientology on this thread is out of his cave again angry as a hornet. Larry, why all the attention to me-im not a scientist or even a blogger. If what I have to say is all dead wrong, why bother? You need to get real Larry. Try looking up new coal power plants in Germany. There you will find reference to germany's prolific return to dirty coal after failure of alternatives and hysterical abandonment of nuclear sfter listening to there own taliban environmentalista's. I don' suppose that would be a lesson you would teach in your taliban training camp, you refer to as a university.
It's right up there with all the hysteria over a CO2 levels going from 300 ppm to 400 ppm. We're talking about one hundredth of one percent of the atmosphere.
I'm scared.
I admit I am here to prog the Warmists.
Like minded Eco-Tards fondling each other and licking one another's nuts.... nice. I don' suppose that would be a lesson you would teach in your taliban training camp, you refer to as a university.
like shooting biscuit dough.
What are the social , scientific, and business costs of Ed's assertion of unrealized costs of FF's , due to environmental and human impacts and mitigation costs, if natural variability , as it is currently demonstrating, turns out to far exceed the small human contribution. I know Ed doesn't mind gambling with the private populace's money and livlihoods since he and most everyone close to him feel insulated in their positions inside government bureacracy.What are the social , scientific, and business costs of Ed's assertion of unrealized costs of FF's , interested in fully participating in his gamble? due to environmental and human impacts and mitigation costs, if natural variability , as it is currently demonstrating, turns out to far exceed the small human contribution. I know Ed doesn't mind gambling with the private populace's money and livlihoods since he and most everyone close to him feel insulated in their positions inside government bureacracy. Are the private sector members of you here really interested in fully participating in his gamble? Off to the basin for some healthy obsessions.My god, the taliban chieftain, our one practicing ayatollah I know Ed doesn't mind gambling with the private populace's money and livlihoods since he and most everyone close to him feel insulated in their positions inside government bureacracy. Are the private sector members of you here really interested in fully participating in his gamble? Off to the basin for some obsessions.
You are screaming constant other babbling bullshet that has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
Totally made sense.
Deny what?
Have I ever claimed there hasn't been warming over the last 150 years?
Have I ever claimed humans weren't a factor?
Therein lies the problem, not you guys mind you since you are largely separate from the industry, just hysterically vocal mouthpieces promoting your childish ideology to the end
es, you are fuked up in the head and else where Bruce. But hey, you live in communist B.C. and you'll be looked after regardless of your utter uselessness to society.
Of course that is coming from the lead..... HYPOCRITE.
It's like he doesn't even get it.
" There's a continued political onslaught of lavishly funded opposition to the science itself"
My god, the taliban chieftain, our one practicing ayatollah
I believe that this graph and trend are more in kind to your assessing the skewed reality of this issue....
Then again, ... will do what he believes will bring him attention and sparkling kudos from his fellow tards.
Nice.... simply nice
I don' suppose that would be a lesson you would teach in your taliban training camp, you refer to as a university.
just because america has surpassed the clean air goals established by the kyoto protocol without even ratifying the kyoto protocol while NONE of the actual ratifiers of the kyoto protocol have met their goals doesn't prove that the free market is more effective for dealing with these issues any more than the environmental disasters perpetrated by past and current communist/socialist societies disproves that government is incapable of addressing such issues
It's not just declining newspaper coverage in parallel with declining temps and the self discredidation of the CAGW crowd. No, it's much more.Tear yourself away from the horror show of that green tech laden stock portfolio of yours long enough to concentrate.Now Larry and his compatriots all agree that this is 97.1% consensus science with a 95% certainty of current and future adverse climatic conditions as a result of anthro CO2 release, right? Well, assuming the truth of that why are huge sums of limited funding still being granted for study of a consensus surety? Wouldn't ethics and morality dictate that Larry and crew shift gears from study to appled science of solving such things as the intermittancy/storage problems of wind and solar even if it meant that the notariety and funding he's enjoying would diminish since it would go to the hard sciences of physics, engineering, geology, etc and not to soft sciences like sociology , of which many studies have been conducted on identifying the stupidities of the populace in not comprehending that black is white and up is down in all things AGW? If this ethical disconnect could be corrected it might just help the green tech stocks, humanity in general, and your own ethics, I mean portfolio.
You are screaming constant other babbling bullshet that has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
who needs facts ...."?
The Chief beat me to it.
The Chief's version, before he edited it.
Dah. Another manipulation on your part LARRY!!! Nice.
i know you libs love the chi-coms
Precisely RON!
A "communist" with integrity.
Go China
According to whom and what is the underlying definition of "time".
I got it from our President. He wouldn't misrepresent that information, would he?
yes, yes, yes...i know the "science is settled" and all scientists have achieved complete consensus and the data that warm mongerers refuse to publish is far too complicated for mere mortals to understand... Kid like manipulation of graphs all showing the very same thing..
How quickly you all forget.
How fking convenient.
Each and every one of you will die. Get used to that as well.
like shooting biscuit dough.
Rick S has you pegged. Down to the unclipped toe nails that are putting them big fat holes in your agenda socks.
I know Ted Stevens
You are such a Fence Straddler and even worse, a flaming internet KISS ASS!
^^^^which is being caused by pacific tectonic plate activities..
I know Ted Stevens frustrated with the fed bureaucracies endless attacks and shutdowns of Alaskan industry was of the mind if Tear yourself away from the horror show of that green tech laden stock portfolio of yours long enough to concentrate.Now Larry and his compatriots all agree that this is 97.1% consensus science with a 95% certainty of current and future adverse climatic conditions as a result of anthro CO2 release, right? Well, assuming the truth of that why are huge sums of limited funding still being granted for study of a consensus surety? Wouldn't ethics and morality dictate that Larry and crew shift gears from study to appled science of solving such things as the intermittancy/storage problems of wind and solar even if it meant that the notariety and funding he's enjoying would diminish since it would go to the hard sciences of physics, engineering, geology, etc and not to soft sciences like sociology , of which many studies have been conducted on identifying the stupidities of the populace in not comprehending that black is white and up is down in all things AGW? If this ethical disconnect could be corrected it might just help the green tech stocks, humanity in general, and your own ethics, I mean portfolio.your going to shut down We can talk more in depth about ethics, or the lack thereof, after you've completed your funding studies.are liviehood your damn well going to pay for it.peruse and chew on this summation of funding for 1998=2009 of 99 billion dollars and the presidents office funding for CC from 2012-2012.We can talk more in depth about ethics, or the lack thereof, after you've completed your funding studies. This is only the obvious funding . I'm sure there are many billions more from the hay days of earmarking. He built the UA environmental science programWe can talk more in depth about ethics, or the lack thereof, after you've completed your funding studies. with hundreds of millions of dollars in earmarks, also fisheries studies, forestry studies, direct compensation- if you cant beat them then beat them on there own game was the attitude. We can talk more in depth about ethics, or the lack thereof, after you've completed your funding studies.I know Ted Stevens frustrated with the fed bureaucracies endless attacks and shutdowns of Alaskan industry was of the mind if your going to shut down are liviehood your damn well going to pay for it.These figures do not count the many additional billions of dollars funding CC coming from environmental NGO's, private foundations, billionaires, state, and local governments etc. For you zealots out there-try to match the imagined opposition funding dollar for dollar.We can talk more in depth about ethics, or the lack thereof, after you've completed your funding studies.Tear yourself away from the horror show of that green tech laden stock portfolio of yours long enough to concentrate.Now Larry and his compatriots all agree that this is 97.1% consensus science with a 95% certainty of current and future adverse climatic conditions as a result of anthro CO2 release, right? Well, assuming the truth of that why are huge sums of limited funding still being granted for study of a consensus surety? Wouldn't ethics and morality dictate that Larry and crew shift gears from study to appled science of solving such things as the intermittancy/storage problems of wind and solar even if it meant that the notariety and funding he's enjoying would diminish since it would go to the hard sciences of physics, engineering, geology, etc and not to soft sciences like sociology , of which many studies have been conducted on identifying the stupidities of the populace in not comprehending that black is white and up is down in all things AGW? If this ethical disconnect could be corrected it might just help the green tech stocks, humanity in general, and your own ethics, I mean portfolio. I know Ted Stevens frustrated with the fed bureaucracies endless attacks and shutdowns of Alaskan industry was of the mind if your going to shut down are liviehood your damn well going to pay for it.
You are screaming constant other babbling bullshet that has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
" There's a continued political onslaught of lavishly funded opposition to the science itself"
Hows the weather here? Cold as crap last night as the winds were at 60 mph and the power was out all night long until this am..
^^^^which is being caused by pacific tectonic plate activities..
Either you're going to believe the Warmists who are hired to
write reports saying the temp is increasing or not.
the data that warm mongerers refuse to publish is far too complicated for mere mortals to understand...[
|
Let us know!