9/11 belief, mythology, and the unknowable (OT)

Clicking on links is often times beyond them.

The final report did not examine key evidence, and neglected serious anomalies in the various accounts of what happened. The commissioners admit their report was incomplete and flawed, and that many questions about the terror attacks remain unanswered. Nevertheless, the 9/11 Commission was swiftly closed down on August 21 2004.

I do not believe in conspiracy theories. I prefer rigorous, evidence-based analysis that sifts through the known facts and utilises expert opinion to draw conclusions that stand up to critical scrutiny. In other words, I believe in everything the 9/11 Commission was not.

The failings of the official investigation have fuelled too many half-baked conspiracy theories. Some of the 9/11 "truth" groups promote speculative hypotheses, ignore innocent explanations, cite non-expert sources and jump to conclusions that are not proven by the known facts. They convert mere coincidence and circumstantial evidence into cast-iron proof. This is no way to debunk the obfuscations and evasions of the 9/11 report.

But even amid the hype, some of these 9/11 groups raise valid and important questions that were never even considered, let alone answered, by the official investigation. The American public has not been told the complete truth about the events of that fateful autumn morning six years ago.

What happened on 9/11 is fundamentally important in its own right. But equally important is the way the 9/11 cover-up signifies an absence of democratic, transparent and accountable government. Establishing the truth is, in part, about restoring honesty, trust and confidence in American politics.

When I go back to work, a lot of people will be disappointed. The stuff I now do for others will have to be subcontracted ...






Its none of your f*#king business what I do you worthless crap. I am independent, a private citizen and under no pressure to do anything I don't want to. I have a life that you can't even dream of jerkwad.


get off it. Your poor attempts at distraction just highlight your own inability to address the actual issues posted on this thread. You don't want to have a discussion on the facts and opinions of this thread, you would do everybody a favor by f*#king off.

The inertia of the airliner would push it into the ground in most cases.

i dont get where they said their was a conspiracy....i doubt that there are many government projects that will say that they have all the time and $ they need, no surprise there.

American 77 Flight Path version2 - In 3D
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3752900324142560520#

Does the NTSB report for Flight 77, and the flight recorder for Flight 77 match? Nope.

AA Flight 77 flew to the North of the Citgo Station and overflew the Pentagon if indeed it was AA Flght 77. They wanted people to see a massive jet but it didn't slam into the Pentagon. It overflew the Pentagon.

Its hard to do good posting when you are rushing trying to keep up with people who are doing NOTHING to prove their claims but posting their own spew

hey, nobody said government funding made sense...

I think a lot.