Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
Messages 1 - 328 of total 328 in this topic |
Splater
climber
Grey Matter
|
|
Topic Author's Original Post - Aug 18, 2015 - 07:09pm PT
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/26/opinion/sunday/the-rise-of-climbing.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur&_r=2
I guess this was news to the author,
but more obvious to most of us who never left the sport.
Well written except for this:
"The industry has abandoned the pretense that pre-existing climbing communities like those in Berkeley and Boulder are critical to success. The mostly flat Midwest, in fact, has emerged as the area of fastest growth, with new gyms in Oklahoma, Nebraska and Ohio."
That "pretense" was fairly true when climbing gyms were starting out 25 years ago. They were lower budget, having to count on limited numbers of dirtbags. The people that gyms now market to did not exist at that time. It took many years for early gyms to pay back their initial capital. In fact it was those very gyms who helped create that market over 25 years, along with the internet.
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 07:11pm PT
|
Yes, gyms have helped evolve climbing into a sport....to me it has always been a way of life,
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 07:16pm PT
|
More like gyms serving as the missing engine necessary to bring a new level of commercial viability to the business via a vast increase in the demographic.
But 'maturing' or 'evolving'? Highly debatable.
|
|
MikeMc
Social climber
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 07:30pm PT
|
Climbing became hip, and cool, and "safe" in a controlled environment. I'd say it has devolved if anything.
|
|
jgill
Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 07:31pm PT
|
Climbing has been a sport going back at least to the last quarter of the 19th century. All sorts of societal influences made this possible. What gyms have added is a more formal and controlled competitive aspect.
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 07:34pm PT
|
In a persons life sports are transient, lifestyles are forever.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 08:17pm PT
|
True and I know a guy who's lifestyle includes working up through the grades in a bouldering gym for five years to climb V6 but who, after one go, said climbing outside doesn't interest him in the slightest.
I guess that's an evolved lifestyle sport.
|
|
elcap-pics
Big Wall climber
Crestline CA
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 09:12pm PT
|
"They" used to say that climbing was the best exercise for climbing... climbing gyms seem to have filled the bill... a form of exercise that is not so boring as regular gym workouts... not a bad thing.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 10:16pm PT
|
Climbing could have a different meaning to different people, and that's ok. I personally lean towards a way of life, but I have not done it for most of my life like Jim, so who knows what am I gonna be excited about in 4 years...
I am happy that gyms exist. Met a high school friend in Planet Granite today. Can't wait to take her along on a cragging trip sometime this fall. Would be super fun to show her walls of Yosemite or something like that.
|
|
BLUEBLOCR
Social climber
joshua tree
|
|
Aug 18, 2015 - 10:38pm PT
|
Climbing Gyms(scientifically contrived),are certainly science's way of measuring climbing.
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 08:24am PT
|
I bristle when I hear climbing denoted as a sport. But then I think of my friend Sergei Efimov,
speed-climbing champeen of the USSR. Dude had the soul of Vysotsky and Pushkin. All he
wanted to do, when he wasn't climbing, was read poetry, sing, and play his guitar. I suppose
there could be folks like him in a gym in Omaha, except he also enjoyed the odd romp up the
Cassin Ridge on Denali.
Y'all do recall that the IOC was inches from making it an Olympic sport, right?
|
|
cat t.
Sport climber
CA
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 08:41am PT
|
I think an increase in female participation has all but tamed the wild beast that climbing was 50 years ago when I started climbing mountains. HAHAHA WTF
As Vitaliy has said, "Women make better climbing partners. They're more adventurous."
The point of this article is about the state of pure athletic performance in climbing--they weren't claiming it's matured as a discipline, but rather that it's matured as a sport. I think that's an interesting discussion on its own. It's a valid point: people who learn a skill as adults and train only haphazardly are NOT going to accomplish the same physical abilities as those who begin regimented training at an early age. (Which has nothing to do with leading runout slab, bolting ethics, an understanding of the wilderness, or whatever your favorite "sport climbers don't know ___" topic is.) With more gyms, regimented training, and a preponderance of child-crushers, the physical limit of what is possible to climb is going to go up, and it certainly becomes more and more "sport like."
(I'm just as uncomfortable with that as any old dude on ST, but I also recognize that a large part of my discomfort comes from the fact that I'm a bit jealous that those climbers are undeniably better at the pure movement aspect of climbing than the average--or above average--trad climber.)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 09:17am PT
|
If women are more adventurous in climbing, why do men do 99% of first ascents? Oh man, what a TOUGH one to answer. Maybe because so many women get their introduction to climbing from arrogant dudes who belittle them? No, that couldn't be it. It must be because all women are weak-willed and soft-bodied.
|
|
looks easy from here
climber
Ben Lomond, CA
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 09:32am PT
|
Y'all do recall that the IOC was inches from making it an Olympic sport, right?
I believe it's still on the list of possible additions for 2020.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 09:36am PT
|
'Athletic performance' and grades have risen (as they always have), but the bottom line is the skills and abilities have plummeted as a percentage of the total demographic. It's now more like gymnastics where millions are culled to produce a very small percentage of top performers. Pre-gyms and pre-sport, the overall performance spread across the entire demographic was far, far narrower.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 10:10am PT
|
healyje, I definitely agree with that assessment. It seems to be the inevitable progression as an activity moves from niche to mainstream. (I watched the same "widening distribution" thing happen with knitting, of all things...)
Not sure what value judgment to place on this change, though.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 10:29am PT
|
It's not a value judgment so much as an observation that 'what climbing is' has been essentially redefined. For the overwhelming majority of the demographic, 'climbing' is now essentially defined by the red-point process, e.g. dogging up a route until you can do a clean ascent, or 'dog, dog, dog, send, next'.
So be it, but if that reduction is what constituted climbing for me I'd be bored out of my skull and find the entire exercise so numbingly dreary and pointless I wouldn't bother doing it anymore.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 10:34am PT
|
Sure that beast is alive and well where climbers endeavor to hunt it down, but the animal that the vast majority of today's climbers want to hang out with is more of a finicky pussy cat, or a tail wagging, leg humping pup.
Part of me wants to agree with that statement, even though I can’t really talk about the climbing culture in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s or even 2000s since I started in 2010. BUT from what they show in programs and from what I gather on this forum, the culture has changed a lot. The changes seem to be also affected by the resource - the rock. When there were no guidebooks and people were mostly getting out climbing as a way to scramble up, or climb a peak it was more of an adventure, and attracted a different type of a user. Now that pretty much 95% of good lines in popular destinations like Yosemite Valley have been climbed out and climbing has gone mainstream, most of the people look at it as consumers. Is it a 5 star climb? Is there a move by move topo? Is there a rapell route in case we take too long projecting the crux pitch? Why bother climbing something that requires an approach, has questionable quality or may make one feel uncomfortable for a second? Most people that started in the gym don’t even think there is anything to climb aside from the established routes. And the only new routes are on 7000M Himalayan peaks done by mutants like Ueli Steck. A long time sport climber once asked me “Well why the hell no one has climbed the line you claim a first ascent of if it is as good as you say?” Hmmmm how would one know something is good before someone can actually give a review? Blame the guidebooks for all the change!
I don’t think females play a big part in why the user has changed. Maybe in the gym it is easier to pick up a gf. But in the outdoor world females are still outnumbered. Which means lower chance of getting laid. I heard internet apps and sites like match.com are a much better way to get laid vs becoming a climber. Even though there are plenty of posers out there who treat gym climbing like an impressive activity to brag about. ANyway, I think it comes down to an individual and their drive. There were and are all sorts of people out there. Strong, weak, liars and courageous honest people. Guidebook climbers and adventure climbers. Boulderers and sp…...t cl…...rs. :) To each their own, I am happy to hang out with all sorts of people.
Times do change and there is no running away from that. Is it good or bad? I don’t know, I am not complaining personally. Have plenty of sh#t to do, for the next 20 years at least! Have been climbing so much that I don’t even have the time to post about it! So sad! (sarcasm)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 10:56am PT
|
When there were no guidebooks and people were mostly getting out climbing as a way to scramble up, or climb a peak it was more of an adventure, and attracted a different type of a user.
I think this is a phenomenon that extends way beyond climbing. The average American in 2015 is used to consuming highly curated information--information they probably perceive as being produced by some far-away expert to whom they cannot relate at all. I think this information-curation is great in many regards (the availability of so much knowledge is amazing!), but I think it can also lead to a sort of complacent helplessness.
At Shuteye a few months ago I heard someone going on and on about a climber they'd heard on a podcast. I automatically assumed it was their friend. "No--oh no. I've never met them! I'm just a fan," the stranger insisted, then continued hero-worshipping the climber in question. I was baffled--the "celebrities" of climbing are just normal people that anyone who climbs a lot is inevitably going to run into with some frequency.
It's not so much a value judgment so much as an observation that 'what climbing is' has been essentially redefined. Yeah. If it were all about athletic performance and redpointing that next harder grade...that sounds incredibly, incredibly boring. I actually rather dislike sports in general and find the idea of "climbing as sport" quite aversive. A lot of people seem to enjoy it that way, though, and I hesitate to crap on other people's joy. I don't think "climbing for the love of exploration" will ever die.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 11:36am PT
|
So be it, but if that reduction is what constituted climbing for me I'd be bored out of my skull and find the entire exercise so numbingly dreary and pointless I wouldn't bother doing it anymore.
Beautiful thing about climbing is that you as an individual get to pick what YOU want to do. If you don't want to dog up routes, you don't have to! I change what I personally do quite often. I climb in the gym, sport climb (wish I could go more often!), do first ascents that usually range from 500 to 2000+ ft, dog up single pitches and RP them later (can't really call it trad, more like sport climbing on gear), try to onsight established routes at the limit of my abilities, ice climb, at times do big walls, climb high altitude peaks, repeat obscure established routes that have slim to none description somewhere. I also climb fingercracks at the gym, scramble up to 5.9 in the mountains and like to hike up Mission Peak (Fremont). I find this variety as a very important part of why I love climbing. The diversity. Ability to meet different people with different interests from different generations and with different goals. Ability to travel and check out different crags, mountain ranges and countries. Some focus on one aspect. Some on two, three etc. The choice is yours! If most people in my circle of friends focus on climbing gnarly high boulders in Bishop, it doesn’t mean I must follow. I don’t understand why the choices of others are so bothersome to individuals who are affected in no way by those choices. You still get to pick what YOU want to do.
F*#k, that was a long post stating the obvious...
This weekend I am planning to hike over 10 miles and find a way into the canyons that look like bushwhacking hell from the elevation profile on the map and visual. No info about anyone going into those canyons or comment about what is there. Not even a close up photo of the walls that are seen in the area. Planning to climb new routes that may or may not involve over 1000 ft of new terrain, runouts, choss, cracks, slab, or maybe I won't even be able to cross the creeks or make it to the base? Can't wait to find out.
In a few weeks I plan to climb first 4 pitches of an established route so I could top rope the sh#t out of the first 4 pitches of another semi impossible for me route so I could see what is it all about and what aspects of my climbing I have to work on to redpoint it in the very distant future. I understand that there are many people who can pass judgement and call me lame for either of those things, but they can suck it, because it is my choice what to do and when to do it. Maybe I can pre place gear on that hard climb and pink point one of the easier pitches? I dunno, maybe if I feel adventurous?! :)))
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 11:39am PT
|
Echoing what's already been said, I think it's so funny that people are so quick to place moral judgement on things as pointless as climbing up rocks.
I don't place a moral judgment on it, I place a judgment around it relative to the potential for the grid-bolting of all the rock within a two-hour radius of every metropolitan area in the country.
And WTF, if the new generation of kids get used to Planet Granite's bolt spacing they'll soon be calling today's [outdoor] sport climbing 'adventure climbing' and demand the retrobolting of existing sport climbs to 'modern' standards.
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 11:41am PT
|
Right on Vitaliy! Plus one for amazement at the useless judging.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 11:58am PT
|
TL;DR: Nothing matters; do what you love.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:00pm PT
|
...just so long as what you love is climbing bolted lines.
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:04pm PT
|
I love all types of climbing .....EXCEPT, I'm not a big fan of the artificiality if gyms and I'm not in love with kicking steps in steep snow slopes.
Going to clip some bolts in a few minutes,
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:10pm PT
|
It's no more or less useful or good than suffering up mountains.
WHAT?! Of course it is inferior to what I like to do! Isn't it about passing judgement and inflating own ego by proving how inferior the other climbers are? Sport climbing is neither! Gyms are lame! Those who redpoint trad climbs are wankers! Females are not real climbers! Those who can't do 20 pull ups and 80 push ups in a row (cuz that's my limit) are totally inferior! And those who don't listen to numetal are lame too!
|
|
Rhodo-Router
Gym climber
sawatch choss
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:15pm PT
|
< I don’t understand why the choices of others are so bothersome to individuals who are affected in no way by those choices. >
Heh. Gives 'em something to yammer on about.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:36pm PT
|
Only listen to numetal when adding new metal retro bolts to 12X routes from the 80s.
Those who don't retro bolt 5.7 R from the 70s are also lame.
|
|
Bruce Morris
Social climber
Belmont, California
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 12:39pm PT
|
In today's climbing marketplace, the emphasis on baby-sitting little kids is driving the real climbers out of the gyms and back onto the real stone.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 01:03pm PT
|
I'm not in love with kicking steps in steep snow slopes My toenail-less toes could not agree with this more. Kicking into steep snow should be banished. Invalid form of activity.
@Warbler, there is no clearer demonstration that one has entirely missed the interesting & insightful part of a discussion than resorting to absurd, outdated sexism.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 02:18pm PT
|
Vitaliy,
Thanks for having the courage to sort of back me up on the truth in that statement. By the way, I've thorougly enjoyed your TRs and consider you to be the best new representative of the climbing spirit that posts here. As a result, I think your views carry a lot of weight. You pick a nice balance between all out effort and dedication to climbing and a light hearted attitude towards it.
Keep charging wildman!
Thank you for the complement. I agree that the culture has change but don’t think that women are the cause. IMO the likely cause is a combination of things. The amount of established routes, increase in number of well written guidebooks, number of climbers attracted to the sport after starting to climb in the gym and many other reasons. The ego and desire to attract the opposite sex is in human nature and it is likely a part of it too. Reproduction has been almost as important as finding food for ages. I don’t think I know a single guy or a girl that does not want to be liked by others. And if they say so, they are likely lying….
I don’t want to be critical of those I have not met. But some things I heard and saw don’t make me look at those who came before me as some masculine bad asses. Like the incident with Bachar, the idol, supposedly snitching to cops after he got punched by your friend after chopping his bolts? I was not there obviously, and don’t know the full story. Maybe even talking out of my ass. But that does not seem like a masculine thing to do. And photo of these stone masters does not make them look much different than the typical spoiled anorexic group of hipsters from the modern gyms. Yes good at climbing...like those modern hipsters good at campusing.
PS: I know some of the pictured are members here and hope you don’t take it the wrong way. Rest of the world is still gonna hero-worship you! I met Werner once and thought he was one of the nicest random encounters I ever had. Guy offered to help me fix my car in like the first 5 mins of our conversation. The point is not to question his or other people's masculinity (is that how you spell that), but to note that some guys from the 40s could look at that photo and pass a judgement on how feminine those dudes look. Not sure if my point is very clear, but for me it all comes down to - worry about yourself, give less sh#t about judging others based on their looks/sex/skill/interests/whatever, even if it will comfort your ego.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 02:33pm PT
|
I don't think you can read, man...
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 03:28pm PT
|
You guys would get along fine in real life. I think. :) Sexism does work both ways. And both sexes have egos. Got to judge each person individually. And remember, no matter what, they are inferior to us! (jk)
Attending some of the supertopo gatherings made me realize how similar and friendly majority of people out there are. Even those who are shy and don’t talk much at first. People from different generations, who take climbing very serious or not at all, different skill levels and motivations. Can gather and have a great time. Balch fest, Shuteye, Danland and one that I liked the most was the Donini’s Indian Creek gathering. Hope there is another one of those I can attend soon!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 04:49pm PT
|
A few things:
(1) What I love about ST is that everyone's so damn feisty. Warbler, I'm sure we'd get along in real life. Though not if you called me "kitten," good god.
(2) Of course there are more men climbing than women. I was being entirely facetious when I quoted V's comment about women being more adventurous--both sexes are capable of being badass; both sexes are capable too of being total limp dicks. Putting the "women are more adventurous" comment in context, though: it was from a conversation about people's willingness to put aside ego and push themselves and try things where they might fail. The observation V made was that the women he's climbed with have tended to be, on average, much more okay with messing up or being uncertain and then continuing to try hard without taking a serious hit to the ego. I have no idea if this is generalizable, sample size is too small. There's also a lot of selection bias, since anyone in the sample had to put up with Vitaliy ;)
(3) Equating "female" with "weak" or "masculine" with "superior" creates a discussion-environment where reason's left at the door. It's impossible to have any sort of rational discussion when that's an automatic assumption.
|
|
Clint Cummins
Trad climber
SF Bay area, CA
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 05:33pm PT
|
Right.
Climbing is supposed to be "human vs. nature". (nature might be loosely defined as gravity)
Not "man vs. woman", or "man vs. man".
Although sometimes the crag or gym gets crowded and people are in the way, in theory there is lots of space to get outside and climb whatever way you want.
Especially if you like doing new routes.
Personally, I don't care about what people are doing in gyms,
or at sport crags, on first ascents or not, etc., as long as I can get out and climb the way I want to.
If I was trying to make a living as a climber or as a climbing photographer, then trends of climbing styles could definitely affect me.
So I'm "keeping my day job". :-)
|
|
SteveW
Trad climber
The state of confusion
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 06:52pm PT
|
I think what Jim says is about right.
Warbler--say those things to Lynn Hill, Sybille Hechtel, Bev Johnson (rip),
and a few other really, really high caliber women climbers. . .
just ain't so. . .
|
|
crankster
Trad climber
No. Tahoe
|
|
Aug 19, 2015 - 07:50pm PT
|
There plenty of room for everyone.
|
|
crunch
Social climber
CO
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:42am PT
|
The overwhelming presence of women climbers has tamed climbing. You can't appreciate what I'm saying if you haven't seen fifty years of climbing's evolution, and haven't dirtbagged it in the late sixties and early seventies. I'm not even saying it's a bad thing. It's kinda nice having most climbers watching each other's asses in the gym or within a few minutes of the road.
I've seen 40 years of climbing's evolution, I dirtbagged plenty in the late 70s and 80s.
You're confusing cause and effect. One major thing that has worked to "tame" climbing is bolts. As bolts increase in number (and diameter!) climbing shifts from a high-stakes sport akin to motorcycle racing or bull-fighting to a mere athletic pursuit like, say, pole vaulting or mountain biking.
Bachar, for one, could see this coming, hated it and while trying to stop or slow this things even came to blows. Here in Colorado there were physical threats, vandalism to vehicles.
Another trend, associated with changes wrought by this first one, was the move to market climbing as a "safe" family-oriented sport that has brought in OFPs*, in droves, to indoor gyms and for guided days outdoors. OFPs want to enjoy an "extreme" sport without having to exercise any common sense, judgement, daring, risk-assessment. They want something like bungee-jumping, a risk-free rush.
Back in the day we all of us despised OFPs. Now we share the crags with them.
Increasing numbers of female climbers is simply a reflection of society's bigger changes since the 1950s; there's more women climbing now just as there are more females in Congress, or doing science, or in the military.
Is the Military "tamed"? Is Congress "tamed"? Is science "tamed"?
A resounding no, to all three. None are changed in any way whatsoever because of the presence of more women.
Likewise, blaming females as cause of climbing's changes is nonsense.
* OFPs. Ordinary F--king People. From Repo Man
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 09:43am PT
|
As far as congress, the military, and science go, mostly they are very tame by my definition, infested with rules There has been a huge effort to get more women involved in science. At least in the biological sciences, it's working.
I unfortunately can speak only anecdotally (and with a few vague memories from seminars on gender/science from which I do not remember original sources). I know nothing of government, but modern science is far from tame--and the fields developing most wildly and most rapidly seem much more gender-inclusive than the stagnating fields. (My information comes from working in neuroscience and observing friends in many other fields; I would prefer to supplement this with some wider data...) I would venture a guess that this development vs. stagnation is not the result of female inclusion, but rather that the fields that are innovative and interdisciplinary are NEW (and, because they are newer, there are fewer entrenched and archaic ideas, and thus a more equal gender ratio). What it ends up resulting in, though, is that the wild and untamed frontier of biological science is full of plenty of women. :)
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 10:12am PT
|
Back in the day we all of us despised OFPs. Now we share the crags with them.
Yeah, f*#k ordinary people. They don't deserve to climb on public lands, unlike us REAL climbers.
If I see this guy on my trail he is gonna get mugged!
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 10:39am PT
|
I wonder, how often and how severe does one need to get injured to claim they have pushed it hard on rock? :)
|
|
Marlow
Sport climber
OSLO
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 10:55am PT
|
It's a well known fact that many an old mountain hardman was a cheater who had a gym in his cellar or garden...
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 11:11am PT
|
'Athletic performance' and grades have risen (as they always have), but the bottom line is the skills and abilities have plummeted as a percentage of the total demographic. It's now more like gymnastics where millions are culled to produce a very small percentage of top performers. Pre-gyms and pre-sport, the overall performance spread across the entire demographic was far, far narrower.
data?
but lets assume you aren't just pulling this out of your crusty trad butt...
If this is true, why do you want it to change? Instead of 'grid bolted crags in a two hour radius of major cities', there would be a large demographic that aspired to do 5.10 R/X routes from the 70s with sparse rusted bolts... then those crags would have waiting lines.
There are more people in the last 30 years and climbing gyms have made climbing available to many who would never have the experience. The midwest has seen a lot of new gyms. Why do you want to deny people, especially kids, a part of what inspires you?
Some don't want to and stay in gyms, others would like to and will eventually leave fly over country to move to CO and do 'Trad' lines with thousands of others seeking that experience.
But why are gyms bad? They get people into the same sport you enjoy. It isn't an exclusive club.
Oh and apparently women do the climbing now too. They are even allowed to wear short pants when they do it!
|
|
Matt's
climber
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 03:22pm PT
|
warbler-- you've been arguing back and forth with "cat t."
In case you don't know-- cat is a neuroscientist, a badass climber and has done first ascents with vitaly.
I think you missed her main observation about why there are way fewer female FAs than male FAs.
She observed how many male partners belittle their female partners.
Imagine if your climbing mentors belittled you. If they never let you lead any of the runout or scary pitches because "you weren't good enough, didn't have the balls". If they always made you follow. If they never taught you how to place gear.
Would you have developed as a climber?
Would you have gone onto an enviable list of FAs?
matt
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 04:46pm PT
|
It can go in circles indefinitely:
"User Group X engages less in Activity Y because they are actively discouraged."
"No, they engage less in Activity Y because User Group X does not like Activity Y."
"They don't like Activity Y because they're met with negativity and adversity when they try it."
"Yes, because members of User Group X don't belong there."
"....it's that attitude exactly that keeps them out..."
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 05:43pm PT
|
Last contribution to the discussion before I lose reception and start a giant hike with lots of bushwhacking and maybe some interesting climbing predicted by Google Earth. ....
It is important to judge individuals as individuals. If Warbler was treated like sh#t by his mentors I don't think he would stick around him/her. As any normal female should not stick around their guy mentor or a friend who treats her like sh#t. There are plenty of other people to climb with and be friends with. And plenty of things to do in the wild by yourself if you are seeking to climb.
When I met Caitlin, she asked me for advice on climbing OWs, in the gym (LOL), and I think I was nice and encouraging. I didn't want anything from her and didn't even think we would end up climbing together. FAs with giant approaches were not even in my dreams. But anyway, we have a healthy relationship in which I don't treat her better or worse than my male partners with similar experience level. At this point I think we both learned and had some benefit from climbing with each other.
And I am sure Lynn Hill was not put down by her guy friends. One thing for sure, she was able to stick up for herself. At least the "it goes boys!" statement is classic. Seems like she was able to stick up for herself. Trying to make a point that in the past, i am sure there were also encouraging guy partners. Not as awesome as me of course. :)
There are people out there who may treat you as an inferior climber or a human, no matter if you look, smell, talk different or are of a different nationality. But f*#k those people there are others who will be excited to get out and 'send the gnar' on high altitude double corniced death traps or learn how to belay in the gym. It is important to avoid stereotyping men or women because one, two or several were not fair to you.
If mountains are calling, it has always been and will be up to an individual to make it as tame or as spicy of an experience as they want. So I don't see why anyone would feel the need to bash the current climbing culture or random individuals as tame. And I don't see the problem with bolts, as long as they are not put into established routes without the consent of a FA party. But that's a different discussion. Plenty of cliffs for those who want to sport climb, trad climb or do FAs. As Warbler pointed out earlier, you don't have to climb in a circle of those you don't want around. Personally, the only type of a climber that annoys me is the one that goes to a popular crag and complains about all the 'noobs' around....if you constantly find yourself surrounded by people you don't like and you are not guiding, maybe it is time to change the venue and quit whining on the internet. Just my 2 cents..as I said before, during the different supertopo gathering I have met all sorts of climbers. From 60 year old beginners, older legends to pathological liars, spraymasters and dirtbags. I personally love the diversity and realized that a person's skill level, list of el cap routes they have free climbed and their ability to cope with runouts is not as important as their personality. So surround yourself with positive people and don't get seriously hurt trying to impress your peers while putting up that R X test piece :)
|
|
ecflau
Gym climber
CA
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:18pm PT
|
Funny thread. I was mostly a boulderer until my wife got me into sport/trad climbing, and my crash pads have only left the garage once in the past 3 years.
My wife also has a lot more courage then me too... at least a few times, when I'm getting scared, she just goes "c'mon, you climb 5.xx ... if you don't go for it, I'll do it"
Also, just wanted to add... I still enjoy gym climbing. I know its sacrilegious to say, but I do.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
|
I think the reason I found Warbler's misogynistic statements so shockingly disagreeable, actually, is that I've been able to very effectively avoid interacting with partners like that.
Everyone I've climbed with has been supportive and pushed me really hard, and gender has never been an issue for me, in either science or in climbing. If I wanted to live my life convinced that I was being victimized, it would be easy to find men that DO think less of women. They are abundant. However, I have the great luck to have been raised by a pair of middle class engineers who taught me that women should be assertive and independent. I do not enjoy bemoaning the horrors of sexism and so I choose (a choice NOT available to many women) to surround myself with people who aren't shitty. The dudes I choose to hang out with are people like Vitaliy, Matt, and Mike, all of whom posted reasonable things in this thread, who treat me like an equal.
Not everyone has the freedom to make that choice, though, and many people--men or women--will only take so much abuse from a community before they decide it's not worth their time to keep searching for companions who don't suck. So: don't be the person that sucks.
My very first alpine climb was a weekend of following V up FAs at Flatiron Butte. Last summer, hiking out from the FA (also just following) of the Southeast Arete of Castle Domes, I exclaimed to V, "I am the luckiest newb!!!!" It marked one year of climbing (of any sort); I'd been trad climbing for about three months, and somehow I'd lucked into accompanying V on remote FAs? I know I'm lucky. You need not state it with dripping condescension. I've been very fortunate to learn in this way--but I also had to make my own luck--by being totally game to hike absurd distances, push past my physical limits, try things that I thought were impossible--
I need not defend myself to you, though, and you seem pretty damn set in your ways.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:29pm PT
|
Since you want to get nasty, would you be doing those backcountry FAs without him? Wait, how is this nasty? Would my second multipitch climb have been an FA if it weren't for Vitaliy...no! Of course not! My pride is in no way wounded by that.
After a summer of learning from V it was very important to me to do more of my own planning and organizing. Thus far that effort has been limited to routes that've been climbed before, and I'm cool with that, at this point in my development as a climber.
I do wonder about this a lot: what WILL my climbing preferences be as I become more experienced and independent? I'm not sure. My main focus at the present moment is my science. the amount of time V spends thinking about new lines honestly rivals my dedication to understanding neuronal development. It's hard to imagine splitting my focus and devoting that much time to researching new areas. The idea of exploration, though, is endlessly appealing, so I hope that in coming years I'll get the chance to at LEAST seek out obscurities and perhaps start scoping out some areas of my own. Probably not 5.12s on bubbs, though :)
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:37pm PT
|
Please kitten,
misogynistic is a strong word to be throwing at me.
how about you keep calling her kitten even though she asked you not to?
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 08:39pm PT
|
Nope! Never said you were a woman-hater, just that you made statements that were hateful. Which, indeed, is true!
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 09:34pm PT
|
The point of this article is about the state of pure athletic performance in climbing-
This incredible dude is one of my all time climbing Heroes. He was and still remains one of Climbings true & real Badasses of Badasses. I wonder what the author of this article would think about him if he was alive today. That's of course if the author and most here on this site even know who he is.
Totally amazes me how one's perceptions (or in most cases, misperceptions) can actually govern reality... to some that is. Must of course be a "Locals Only" thing.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 20, 2015 - 10:42pm PT
|
^^^^^^^^^^ Yup! Then he'd kick your ass for being a hypocrite freakoid weed smoking Cali hippy for the same issue that you wanted to be backed up on. Not joking either. He did it numerous times for less all over the world as you well know. Now that was a "sport" to him. He made many a folks cringe when they saw him coming.
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 04:23am PT
|
She calls me an arrogant misogynist, and can't explain why, gets a pass, I call her kitten twice, and you agree I'm a woman hater?
Yes, i would agree that 'woman hater' is probably overblowing it, but the word misogyny is thrown around a lot.
I was pointing out what is the blatant irony of calling her a name you know she doesn't like then wondering why she doesn't like you.
|
|
steveA
Trad climber
Wolfeboro, NH
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 04:53am PT
|
The Chief,
Sorry for the thread drift, but I want to tell you a story concerning Whillans.
In 1971, I was up in the Lakes Distict, UK, drinking a beer in a local pub.
My climbing partner was a local guy, who knew everybody.
I was young, and at that time worshiped all the "famous" climbers. I asked my buddy if any of the "famous" climbers ever came into this pub. He leaned over and whispered in my ear, Don Whillans is sitting right in front of you.
I felt like such an ass. Whillans was listening to my whole conversation,
with kind of a smug expression on his face, sipping his beer.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 05:48am PT
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Yup!! Met him briefly twice back in the mid 70's.
On the second "chance" meeting in the Misurina Hotel bar in Oct 78', I approached him, got his attention, stuck out my hand in gesture, then told him to "Piss off!" with a "smug grin" on my face. I actually startled him. He got off his stool, paused, looked me straight in the eye (as we are about equal height), then said "Aye mate!" He then stuck out his stein of piss to toast up, we clicked steins and had a very brief conversation about the Comici-Dimai on the Cima Grande that me and my buddy were preparing to do in the morning. We shook hands again and he wished me good "Cheers" on the climb.
Thought about our meeting the entire climb.
Steve A... thanks for reminding me.
PS: Clean Aid Solo'd Mordor Wall back in May of 94'. Loved it actually. Thanks for helping finishing up the route, Steve.
AND... Thanks for your Service!!!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 08:03am PT
|
I've repeatedly questioned her perspective and her use of the English language Exactly! You were never going to listen to or respond to the content of anything I said--you were just going to continue saying, "your perspective is invalid."
Granted, my initial response to your initial claim was simply laughter--I thought you were joking, actually. The discussion of gender honestly should've been ended with crunch's statement "You're confusing cause and effect." There are a lot of interesting real points in this thread, and this argument is NOT one of them, it's a pile. Actually, thinking about how/why different people are more or less excited about certain kinds of climbing could be a very interesting conversation. It's not the conversation we had.
Women aren't used to being dealt with like that. Most men mostly kiss ass to women, especially hot young ones, for reasons that are obvious, to me anyway. You can't have a discussion where any attempt at communication is met with mockery. That has nothing to do with "kissing ass." I've had plenty of philosophical discussions with V and Matt where they think I am really damn wrong, and they tell me--loudly--by talking about the issue, not about how I'm a silly kitten.
Also, you ain't special. I'm from Texas. This sort of argument style ("your argument is invalid because you are a hot young girl and I know better") is something any young woman growing up in the small town south is quite used to. I guess I've been gone long enough that I forgot it's better to just avoid those people.
Totally amazes me how one's perceptions (or in most cases, misperceptions) can actually govern reality Spot on, Chief!!
Thanks for the stories, SteveA and Chief, totally great.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:21am PT
|
And by the way, Don Whillans beat his wife. He was also a violent alcoholic. That is prime source information from a person who knew the family VERY VERY well
All in Perrin's book Tami.
BUT, several months before he died, he came/got clean and made amends for all his many past ill behaviors. He got some big time help from a bunch of his "recovering" life time friends that grew up and lived the same learned lifestyle as the entire generations from that region did. Not an excuse just a fact of life for them all.
Now that is what makes him a true Badass and as a Recovering Hardcore Alcoholic myself (Never laid a hand on my Wife/s but did on many males that crossed my path in my alcoholic stupor), I revere.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 10:49am PT
|
@fivethirty:
I think calling someone a misogynist would indeed be an ad hominem attack. You are also correct in pointing out that there's a difference between saying "you are a misogynist" and "the statement you made was misogynistic." The latter (which is what I said) does not call character into question; it specifically addresses a stated point.
Generally ad hominem arguments are fallacious, but I suppose there are cases in which they are somewhat logically reasonable. For example, "Josh Duggar's opinion on the sanctity of marriage carries little weight because he was unfaithful in his own marriage."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/character-attack/
|
|
Marlow
Sport climber
OSLO
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 10:57am PT
|
And The Wide Boyz had their cellar...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 11:31am PT
|
Let's say we define three user groups:
(1) casual gym goer, (2) average outdoor climber, and (3) total hardman/hardwoman.
Group 1 probably would not climb at all if it were not for gyms; the rise of gyms has allowed them to have an athletic hobby; they have basically no measurable effect on bold climbing.
Group 3 would probably be doing badass stuff with or without gyms, but having a training facility cultivates that further and allows them to push the boundaries even more. Perhaps gyms even allow people that might've ended up in group 2 to launch into group 3.
Group 2 is perhaps where it gets more interesting.
How have modern gyms and gym-to-crag classes altered this user group? (In a good way: more inclusive, greater style variety, etc? In a bad way: crowds, lack of understanding of the solemnity of real rock, etc?)
How about information-availability? There are many wonderful advantages, of course. On the other hand, do readily available SuperTopo pitch breakdowns negatively impact the independence and decision-making of the climbers in group 2?
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 01:39pm PT
|
I'd like to ad a bit to this Warbler/Cat thread ... Lol. Just kidding.
The OP article is not a surprise. Gyms have been a good thing, gyms have been a bad thing. My friend Cort here in San Diego opened Solid Rock Gym. My group of climbing friends we all started on rock, me in the early 70s on Woodson.
It was because of gym climbing and climbing on our "Rock Lab" in a backyard of our climbing friend's house we all got really strong and pushed our limits on real rock. The Knuth brothers excelled especially. In all that regard, gyms are great. You can get strong and good fast, but it better be heavily supplemented with real rock and equipment know how.
For those who only climb in gyms I feel sorry for. They're missing the spirit of the sport. It has always been a sport of nature and wilderness enjoyment, outdoor adventure, discovery, risk, and finding your personal limits. Climbing was always badass more so than any other sport. If you know climbing history you know this to be true. Depends on the generation in question and in context.
You know I hike a very well known mountain here San Diego several times a week and I boulder up and down the mountain for a really good all around workout. Seems I'm the only one doing so. It's not Woodson. The boulders aren't as big, but there are some great gems for sure.
Well one early morning I'm doing so and bouldering right off the trail, and a group of younger hot looking women come hiking by. The tallest prettiest one says, "Wow, I never thought about climbing here before, I've only climbed in a gym." I smiled at her and told her, "I would never admit to that if I were you." She said, "Sad huh?" "Yea. Gyms are great and get you really strong, but your're meant to use those skills outside. Look around. There are a lot of really fun good boulders here and it's free." She smiled.
It takes both, the real world and the gym together to see your best gains and abilities. But I mostly like and mostly stick to G-d's free gym. It's the best. Doesn't even feel like you're working out. Just having fun. ;))
Good article. I get it.
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:08pm PT
|
I nominate Cat for President. Or Tami. With Dingus as VP.
Oops, Tami is Canadian.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:15pm PT
|
You guys have fun in your sterile gym ......
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:40pm PT
|
WB,
Have you EVER specifically trained in Camp 4 as a "Stonemaster" doing campus board, ladder, slack line etc. for big wall training or perhaps a very hard high-ball boulder problem that has you stymied?
If so, welcome to sterile gym climbing ;)
I'm pretty sure we've all done it unless of course you're from the 1920s,1930s, or 40s and into death defying climbs in the Alps or alpine terrain. Who knows maybe they trained also and it wasn't just off the couch?
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:42pm PT
|
Training in Camp 4 is NOT sterile.
The sun, wind, clouds, smoke, birds and everything alive is all around ......
Warbler got it right off the bat.
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:47pm PT
|
True, but "training" is gym climbing none-the-less. ;)
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:49pm PT
|
That will be your job ......
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 02:52pm PT
|
Kevin
This modern internet yappin stuff is stooopid.
Why the fuk are we even here ..... :-)
|
|
Klimmer
Mountain climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 03:02pm PT
|
Nature is very sterile ... Bird poop, mouse poop, rat poop, pack rat poop, lizard poop. It all makes the rock really clean and safe to climb on. (Sarcasm)
Make sure you wash your hands before bringing them close to your mouth or nostrils.
We all roll the dice regarding this, that's for sure.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 03:10pm PT
|
Gym versus real rock....MRSA versus plague....
at least Yersinia pestis responds to antibiotics :P
|
|
StahlBro
Trad climber
San Diego, CA
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 03:12pm PT
|
Sometimes "maturing" is a pseudonym for "dumbing down".
|
|
crunch
Social climber
CO
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 04:22pm PT
|
Fecal veneer is no joke.
veneerial disease?
|
|
Matt's
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 05:06pm PT
|
the battle of the sexes is over, warbler, you lost...
|
|
Blue Mountains Orangutan
Sport climber
Sydney, Australia
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 06:40pm PT
|
It must have been amazing to be climbing in the 70s, everyone was soloing 5.12 a week after they started climbing! Maybe Kids These Days are just slow learners. There are a couple of things they have that the old climbers never had though, "jobs" and "families". Not everyone can pack it in to become a climbing bum for a few years when they're 40.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 06:50pm PT
|
Not everyone can pack it in to become a climbing bum for a few years when they're 40.
^^^^ I suggest they take up Golf and/or Cricket in your case! ^^^^
Know what I mean, Mate!
|
|
Blue Mountains Orangutan
Sport climber
Sydney, Australia
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 06:59pm PT
|
^^^^ I suggest they take up Golf and/or Cricket in your case! ^^^^
I'm too old for cricket! If it wasn't for gyms there's no way I'd be climbing though, and I wouldn't be climbing nearly as well either. You have to put the time into training and climbing to get better, gyms just make it easier to put that time in. It has made climbing a lot more accessable to people which you'd think would be a good thing!
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 07:03pm PT
|
^^^ How about Golf... ^^^^
Edit: Get yourself a Fly Rod (Single or Double Handed), Reel, some line, off to the neighborhood park and start casting.
You'd be amazed at the incredible Zen Zone you can achieve... seriously!
Gym climbing reminds me of a Bingo Hall on a Friday night.
|
|
Blue Mountains Orangutan
Sport climber
Sydney, Australia
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 07:39pm PT
|
Gym climbing reminds me of a Bingo Hall on a Friday night.
Yeah lots of hot chicks.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 08:31pm PT
|
Yeah lots of hot chicks.
Really... Oh Man! You should really consider taking up golf now.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 08:51pm PT
|
Oh cry us a river
Warbler had the hottest chicks back then too.
His girlfriend back then won the best lookin legs in in some hot leg contest.
Give it up, you're all taking him way way out of context .....
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:08pm PT
|
Oh cry us another river.
I'm takin up bingo with all those "hot chicks" in the chiefs photo above.
Climbers are stooopid and all their stoopid problems are stoopid too .....
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:18pm PT
|
And B-I-N-G-O... was his name.
Edit: "Your Girl" Jim??? If I ever said that to the Boss she'd pull out and utilize her Glock 19 and put a Cap in my a*# for sure.
Just saying...
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:22pm PT
|
Apparently Kevin, none of them "women" you associate with have nor know how to utilize a Glock. Regardless the model number/type.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:39pm PT
|
Not dead... you'd just be walking around funnee with that cap in your a*# for the rest of your life reminding you who's truly the----- BOSS!
ANYONE knows that the real BOSS in any relationship is the WIFE! She always wins, always. And please don't even try telling us they don't.
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:43pm PT
|
Trudy prefers making me help with her garden and caring for hummingbirds rather than getting her point across with a Glock.
Glock, Hummingbirds, garden, that look they give you when... what ever. Same o same o. They win. Always.
Edit: You got issues with your ladder Jim?
Get ya one of these.... I guarantee the issue is remedied very quickly.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 21, 2015 - 09:54pm PT
|
Yeah but it's all a good thing.
Spot on... and keeping that on the table of our thickass stubborn heads 24/7 helps feed the mice that spin the wheel of serenity within the relationship.
The peace part, will, without some vineger in the mix periodically, the deal would certainly be .... booooooooooooooooooooring.
[Click to View YouTube Video]
Edit: To get back to the OP, the above video can represent Traditional Climbers and the new wave Gym Rats. Ya'll pick the color that best suits the two.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 12:43pm PT
|
Warbler, if your initial comments had just been about gyms, then this thread would have never become the equivalent of jamming your hand into a crack full of bat guano. Or at least it would have been a different flavor of guano.
A lot of the actual comments you made about the rise in the number of women (holy sh!t 50/50) in gyms climbing helping to tame climbing look like this to me:
http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations
I think that in 10, 20 years you will see more women outside and more women putting up FAs/FFAs. People like Lynn Hill, Ines Papert, and Hazel Findlay aren't anomalies any more than any other climber who pushes at that level. They are a sign of what's possible and what's coming.
In the end it does seem stoopid to make moral judgments about climbing. At least the people in climbing gyms aren't sitting on a couch all weekend. I think one thing the article hints at toward the end is that since the sport is expanding so quickly even if you're a gym climber who wants to become an adventure climber, it's hard to find a good mentor to make that transition safe. More people definitely changes the dynamic, but that has to do with accessibility to gyms and training--it's not really about the ratio of men to women in the sport. If that's not what you meant initially, then maybe you should just read back what you actually wrote through the thread about women. That's why anyone would be confused about what you're trying to say:
I think an increase in female participation has all but tamed the wild beast that climbing was 50 years ago when I started climbing mountains.
There are still wild places in the Sierra for people comfortable with a map, a compass and manzaneering. Part of me thinks it's stoopid that I even responded to this thread. Why throw white gas on embers? I'm going outside now--no more computer this weekend!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 01:09pm PT
|
There are still wild places in the Sierra for people comfortable with a map, a compass and manzaneering. C'mon Viv, men are just trying to protect women by keeping them away from the rough world of manzaneering. Their hair could get stuck in the branches--can you imagine the consequences?! They might get their braids so tangled in manzanita bushes that they die out there. And those that survive--those women might get so wild and unfeminine they even cut their hair short.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 07:36pm PT
|
Hey Kevin,
I think it's clear to everyone--you included--that this is not a battle of the sexes. It's a battle of everyone else versus Kevin. It's kind of unfair, actually, and I feel a bit bad that you've been backed into this corner. I'm sorry about that. I'm sure you're an awesome guy and we all kind of suck for ganging up on you.
No one is defending ME in this thread. (Except maybe Matt. Thanks Matt; I have no idea why you still think I'm a badass, but I'll take it.) Everyone else is defending my ideas. No one is attacking you. (Well, maybe. If we were, we shouldn't've been.) They're disagreeing with your ideas.
The men of SuperTopo are not a bunch of pussy-whipped whimperers who rush to defend women because their manliness has been stripped away by shrewish wives, the feminist agenda, and closely spaced bolts. They are tough, adventurous, opinionated men, many of whom have done and still do a great deal to push climbing forward, and they listen with an open mind to the IDEAS of women. Because women are people.
The women of SuperTopo do not automatically defend someone simply because she's a woman. They listen to her ideas, and if they agree, they will stand by those ideas. And by the same token, they consider male-generated ideas with exactly the same weight. Because men are people.
If I suddenly went bat-shit crazy and started spouting sexist nonsense about how all men suck, believe me, all the men and women who'd previously defended my ideas would back away in horror. My opinion would carry no weight if it were rooted in a frenzy of emotional man-hating.
I wish you all the best, man. I'd like to discuss ideas with you, not dogmas. Happy climbing!
From lab on a Saturday night while my silly feet heal themselves up,
Caitlin
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 07:44pm PT
|
The men of SuperTopo are not a bunch of pussy-whipped whimperers
Are you sure ... :-)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 07:46pm PT
|
I dunno there Werner; I think you might be about the wimpiest man that ever tried to climb :P
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 07:48pm PT
|
So true .....
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 07:54pm PT
|
It's ok, maybe Kevin will let you TR his warmups ;)
Werner, you're the most progressive dude here...you understand that everyone sucks equally!!!
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 08:03pm PT
|
LOL
Poor Kevin took some "hits" in this thread ... :-)
Just like many years ago when I passed thru the parking lot behind the Lodge on the way back to Camp 4.
Some guy was selling "lids" for $10.
Then I got over to Camp 4 and Largo and Warbler yell over at me and ask me if I got any weed.
I hand them the mint "lid" I just bought and head back to the Lodge to hang out with Yabo.
I get back to Camp 4 hours later and they smoked 90% of that lid.
That was a lot of hits.
LOL ......
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 08:19pm PT
|
I get back to Camp 4 hours later and they smoked 90% of that lid.
That was a lot of hits. LOL!! Must've had a higher tolerance back then ;)
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 08:41pm PT
|
The men of SuperTopo are not a bunch of pussy-whipped whimperers who rush to defend women because their manliness has been stripped away by shrewish wives, the feminist agenda, and closely spaced bolts.
That's where you're wrong girlfriend. There are a few exceptions of course, but most of the so-called "men" on the Stupid Toke-O have lower T than a crate of Earl Grey in the Marianas Trench.
Metro anorexic SNAG fluff boys in skinny jeans, "ironic" hats (hint boys: they're not), creative facial hair, sipping their soy chai lattes, and getting spanked by stuff that's not even hard enough for the 9 year old girls I coach to warm up on.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 08:49pm PT
|
lower T than a crate of Earl Grey in the Marianas Trench omg such eloquent trollery hahaha +1 +1 +1
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 22, 2015 - 11:40pm PT
|
Are you old enough to drink? Oh hey, a peaceable offer to bro out over beers?? Sweet, dude. I'll take whiskey.
Man, I yell "watch me" on sport climbs so I don't know what you're talking about. Hah! What was I thinking? I've heard you whine on too many squeeze chimneys to call you a real man ;) But who am I to talk, I shamelessly ask for hugs before scary leads...
|
|
Jaybro
Social climber
Wolf City, Wyoming
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 05:11am PT
|
Some funny sh#t here! Even if it does poke around some real issues. Very much in the classic
Shittalking / baiting / trolling tradition.
But I gotta say, for a generalist like myself Виталий nailed it about width, breadth, and opportunity in climbing.
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 01:55pm PT
|
Is it just me, or is anyone else reminded of BURT BRONSON when they read Warbler's posts?
From fb:
]HELLO EVERYONE. BURT BRONSON HERE.
PLEASE - I ENCOURAGE YOU AGAIN TO LOG OFF YOUR COMPUTER SELL YOUR SHINY WHINY SPORT WEENIE GEAR. FIND SOME THREAD AND NEEDLE AND LEARN TO KNIT LIKE A LADY. LEAVE THE MAN FUN TO A REAL MAN, LIKE LYNN HILL. KEEP THE CLIMBS WILD AND FREE FOR REAL MEN TO CLIMB AS GOD INTENDED. ALL OF YOU PEOPLE OUT THERE WHO CAN'T HANDLE HIGH WINDS AND RUN OUTS SHOULD STILL TAKE UP KNITTING. AND YOU GYM BABIES SHOULD LISTEN TO YOUR MOMMIES AND NOT PLAY ON THE ROCKS OUTSIDE. GYMS TURN GOOD MEN INTO GOO. IF YOU ARE A REAL MAN, YOU WILL CUT BARK BEFORE YOU SET FOOT IN A GYM. WELL, OFF TO FREE SOLO THE NOSESTRUM. GOING TO BEAT MY RECORD. YES I PUSHED TOO HARD ON THAT CHIMNEY ON THE DOME OF HALF AND IT ALL CAME TUMBLING DOWN. OF COURSE I DID NOT FALL OFF. SORRY ABOUT THAT TO ALL YOU WEENS WHO CANNOT DO A ONE HUNDRED FOOT DYNO. IT STILL GOES FREE BOYS. IF YOU ARE MAN ENOUGH. I CAN STILL KNIT BETTER THAN YOU TOO.
BURT BRONSON
THE LAST BASTION OF THE HARD MAN AND THE LAST BASTION OF THE SERIOUS CLIMBER
|
|
jgill
Boulder climber
The high prairie of southern Colorado
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 04:02pm PT
|
I CAN STILL KNIT BETTER THAN YOU TOO.
BURT BRONSON
THAT WAS NOT ME POSTING! REPEAT, NOT ME!
BB.
(received as personal message from BB)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 05:52pm PT
|
I don't have statistics to back my observations up, admittedly, but parallel to that is the increase in female participation in "climbing" This was ALL that prompted disagreement from me: "female participation has all but tamed the wild beast." It is impossible to support this hypothesis with data. It's a correlation with no evidence of causation. Data I would accept in favor of your argument: show me women have been retrobolting bold lines, but men haven't. Show me that women are gridbolting sport crags, while men aren't. Etc.
there has been an outspoken feminist minority that has a public hissy fit any time a publication "objectifies" women or pictures them in anything resembling a sexy way Those two things simply aren't the same thing. A sensible feminist, or human, or whatever, understands that. It's hardly "objectification" to notice a sexy person. A photo of a woman climbing in a bikini? Probably not objectification. An endless stream of comments in response to the photo that ignore that she's a person and fixate on how she's there because BOOBS BOOBS BOOBS? Yeah, objectification.
(And since you are SO fond of merriam webster's definitions, let's look up feminism. "The belief that men and women should have equal rights and opportunities." Equal is the key word.)
Still hoping this is an elaborate troll and you actually don't think these things... ;)
I can't.
I wish I could. Tami, I can teach you how to knit! Engineers and climbers always seem to learn best, as they know a lot about designing things and making knots, respectively :)
|
|
ms55401
Trad climber
minneapolis, mn
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 07:07pm PT
|
You could say correctly " Don't like a thread ? Don't click on it" and yes that would be true ( I don't click on them BTW )
Demonstrably false. What a dumb thread; what dumb comments throughout.
Get lives, losers!!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 07:15pm PT
|
you will never know what climbing culture in California was like in the late sixties and early seventies like I do. No, I won't--the Yosemite I know is basically Disney World. But watching Yosemite change does not automatically mean you know why it changed. WAY more things have changed about climbing between '70 and '15 than the number of women participating. I have no idea why you existing in 1970 means you "know" that women are the cause of the change.
Goodness, we could even design a well-controlled study to test some ideas about what effect learning styles prevalent in '70 vs '15 have on the future of a climber. We could take people who have never climbed and create several groups, learning on real rock or in gyms, doing their first climbs with or without topos, etc, and do a longitudinal survey of their progress. Measurable ;)
And, since you're SO curious, I'm 25, and when I was 18 months old I sneakily climbed my way onto a chandelier and my mother walked into the room to find me swinging about on the light fixture.
(Mike, what a day. I can't hear the words "Bugaboos" or "hail" without grinning like a doofus.)
jgill, awesome link! Thanks.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 07:35pm PT
|
I'm going to do something shocking, which is agree with Warbler--in spite of the fact I think he called me vulvre:
Your opinion is based on what you predict, or hope, will happen as far as female FAs go, mine is based on what has happened.
You're absolutely right. That's why I prefaced my comment about the fact I think you will see more women throwing down with "I think." There's a pipeline and there are more women in it, as you pointed out. I'm not going to limit myself to what has happened moving forward, and frankly, neither do you. That's why you did FAs and FFAs.
If we only based what is possible on what has happened, then my outdoor activities would be based around Burt Bronson's haul bag and making my man a sandwich. Fill in blank right's movement would still be stuck in the 1850's. Without that love of exploring and pushing the boundaries, the next time we got the plague from a yosemite squirrel licking our faces, we'd die because there'd be no antibiotics. Without it that sense of possibility, then we might as well all just stick to playing B-I-N-G-O.
Tami-you rock. Not that I'm always a model of politeness, but I don't get why people confuse being rude with being honest.
http://i.imgur.com/3POyupA.gif
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 09:17pm PT
|
jgill, that link about women climbers is wonderful. So much quotable material there. Thanks.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 09:56pm PT
|
I think I'm also done with going in circles and joining the agree to disagree boat. To end on a positive/semi-thoughtful note. +1 on jgill's link. One of my favorite quotes is this one:
[Holland] had lately become a devotee of 'rubbers' (gym-shoes), even on wet ground, where most climbers - bar the latest 'tigers' - find that they slip as treacherously as on ice. The rubber shoe had just come in [1918] and divided the climbing world as sharply as later the question of oxygen or no oxygen for Everest was to do. 'Dangerous and dishonest, and quite out of the true tradition of the sport', said one party. To which the other replied, 'what about the nails in your boots, the rope and your carefully chosen ice-axe? Equally they make climbs much easier.' The same dispute arises with every technical innovation which in any way changes the standard of difficulty."
This makes me think of what started the thread (the NYT article), which in a way, is just a continuation of that same debate.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 23, 2015 - 10:46pm PT
|
I get Kevin's point, but have to respectfully disagree.
Men ran climbing into the dirt with a broad commercialization driven by climbing gyms and with sport climbing. It started out slow, but the demographic really took off as the pace of gym building cranked up and especially once the media and advertisers started incorporating the imagery with more frequency. I honestly believe climbing would have ended up in exactly this place even if no women showed up to party.
And to be honest, even back in the 70's, before sport, only a small percentage of people were either artisans with pro or such a maniac it didn't matter, say 15%. Another 35% were competent and the rest were nervous and sport climbing couldn't have come on the scene fast enough for them. Women had nothing to do with that dynamic. It was bolts, not boobs, that did in climbing.
Reduce climbing to just another risk-free, pop-suburban entertainment option and what do you expect? I always expected exactly what we got.
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:02am PT
|
it has clearly been shown, and recently reviewed that women show higher anxiety in comparison to men (Mchenry et al., 2014)From all behavioral parameters, the anxiety seems to be most sensitive to testosterone.... similar anxiolytic effects of single testosterone administration resulted in reduced fear(Van Honk et al., 2005).
Call me a misogynistic perpetrator of the patriarchy, but I would expect that higher anxiety doesn't lend itself to seeking out inherently uncertain-outcome activities like adventure climbing, FAs, etc. Those gyms sure are soothing though, nice pastels on the walls, music that makes you think you never left your car, metro SNAG boys working the desk in their subservient manner, snacks in the lobby, couches and bean bags. It's almost as good as Xanax.
|
|
Rhodo-Router
Gym climber
sawatch choss
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:22am PT
|
KEVIN
IT"S THE UNIVERSE CALLING
STOP DIGGING!
|
|
Gnome Ofthe Diabase
climber
Out Of Bed
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:29am PT
|
The draw that is, training and the lure of other like minded people working to maintain fitness, while pursuing the act of being a good YO-YO, did entice me a few times.
I was sad to see the sea-change in rock climbing that, that indoor climbing led to.
the form and function of indoor, simulated to copy the things that occur on real rock, led to people gaining skills beyond the learning curves norm.
Often, after three sessions indoors, males, with a natural upper body strength, are climbing juggy 5.11. There is no suffering. No learning curve in gear or form. No going from a rope wrapped around the waist thru tied webbing swami, to tied diaper, to harness.
No finding the amazing weight difference, between the old gear, pins and hamer, to a rack of nuts, both spiritually and physically Up-lifting.
The ability to find the rocks, and other climbers, was part of the gumby gate, if you wanted to rock climb, you had to get to the rocks, if all you did when you got there was stand around and look up, no one noticed, no one was there to stand around and stare. Going Climbing Meant something different then.
Now it is a sanitized world that leads to 'climbers' wanting clean trails, lines up the rock marked by every passage with white dots and smears, so that no dirt - environmental hazards - exist.
bring in the security of bolts, anchors or protection, and many people want to have more , not less. The thinking was that the Gunks needed bolted anchors, the thing is that the placing of bolted anchors opens the question of why not be as safe as can be, why risk at all.
Not me ... by choice, I climb in the woods on fresh dirty stone and try not to use chalk, ever. Trying is easy if you have no chalk, bring it around me and I dipp. Chalk is a white powder and every hippie used to know from caffeine to heroin, the white powder habbits are the hardest to break.
And that Is another thing about gyms they teach all the bad habits, instilling the wrong lessons and making important the things that in long run do not matter.
|
|
Rhodo-Router
Gym climber
sawatch choss
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 10:09am PT
|
just call me kitten
|
|
Bullwinkle
Boulder climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:42am PT
|
"Someone please explain to me why my belief that women have been instrumental in taming the average climbing experience translates to any negative feelings about them on my part."
1. Lynn Hill, StoneMaster, World Champion Comp Climber, 1st Free Acsent of The Nose, 1st Women to Climb 5.13, Mother and Still Climbing 5.13
2. Catherine Destivelle, World Champion Comp Climber, Free Soloist, 1st Ascents World Wide
3. Mari Gingery, StoneMaster, 1st Ascents, in the Needels. Joshua Tree and tall over California.
4. Silvia Vida, Big Wall Soloist on EL Cap and Walls all over the World.
5. JO Whitford, Yosemite Rock Climber extraordinaire.
6. Steph Davis, Free Climbed EL Cap, Free Soloist, B.A.S.E. Jumper
7 Beth Rodden, 1st Free Ascento of Lurking Fear, 2nd Free Ascent of the Nose.
8. Katie Lambert, Top Level Yosemite Trad Climber.
9. Kate Rutherford, 1st Ascents World Wide, Alpine Climber.
10. Emily Harrington. Top Sport Climber, Free Climbed EL Cap, Remote 1st Ascents Wold Wide.
Does this Help? These are just a very very few of the Women that have "Tamed" Climbing. .Im not even going to mention the Women that invented Cams or Sticky Rubber, Portaledges, Grid Bolting, Sport Climbing, Books and Books of Topos and Hot Climbing Tops, yes they've for sure Tamed Climbing. df
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:43am PT
|
Again, bolts - not boobs, and women by and large didn't do the drilling.
If the bolts evaporated overnight the demographic would be 15% of what it is today and legions of 'hot' women climbers wouldn't do squat to lure them back.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
|
I would expect that higher anxiety doesn't lend itself to seeking out inherently uncertain-outcome activities like adventure climbing, FAs, etc. I think based on your previous posts that you're being facetious, but in all seriousness, I don't think you can draw that conclusion.
(1) Anxiety change from baseline (during activity such as climbing) would be the relevant measure here. I don't think baseline anxiety is a great predictor of that.
(2) I've heard a lot of people throw around the idea that climbers are a bit nuts, or that they're drawn to the wilderness because they have trouble settling down like a "normal" person. Climbing....calms us down. I suspect many of us are afflicted with that existential anxiety that can't seem to be assuaged by a paycheck, and learning to deal with uncertainty and fear while adventure climbing does a lot to help diffuse the anxiety about life :)
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:17pm PT
|
My initial observation, which lit the fuse on the fembomb, was simply that gyms had made climbing more tame, and more comfortable, and that appealed to a broad range of broads who would probably never have ventured out to a real crag.
broads? are we using 1950s era language for 'promiscuous women' now?
btw, Im not that PC, just that my Crusty Trad BS meter is twitching.
Why haven't gyms made 'climbing more tame' for guys too?
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:18pm PT
|
how would anyone else's approach to climbing, whether male or female, affect what is entirely a personal choice like boldness?
all due respect to mr. Worrall you sir are a huge stud
Edit:
not much of a reply though
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:21pm PT
|
Why haven't gyms made 'climbing more tame' for guys too? they were just followin' the boobs
it's all because of the boobs
;)
But wait!! Climbing hard totally shrinks boobs. The marketing scheme should fail.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:27pm PT
|
They have
So your thesis is the bolts allowed more women to climb and then they ruined climbing? Hardly. Again, half of climbers before sport climbing and gyms were nervous and jonesing to ditch their racks for the comfort of bolted lines and women had nothing to do with that pent up demand. And that doesn't even touch on the 1..2..3..out! aspect of climbing bitd where the vast majority of people who gave climbing a whirl were in and out in a heart beat - the cull and attrition rate was enormous. That just isn't the case anymore and bolts are the reason for the precipitous decline in boldness and the inability of most climbers to assume and manage the level of risk involved in onsight, ground-up FAs..
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:32pm PT
|
How could anyone here forget this Hardcore and true BADASS! She's got a heart of gold and climbs/bikes for the exact same reasons I did for over 40+ years. And now I have transferred all that zest, focus and intensity she speaks of and have applied it to my Fly Fishing.
Hoooooooooooooya Bobbi!
[Click to View YouTube Video]
If you look closely old Jeff "Medusa" Constine (@ 1:30) is spotting her... HA!
Edit: Hey Kevin (Warbler), she can/could out climb your ass yesterday and today then get down and then kick your ass ragged.
|
|
rbord
Boulder climber
atlanta
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 12:43pm PT
|
My 8 yr old daughter plays youth soccer. She likes it. She's a good athlete, so I encourage her to play sports, because it's potentially a good way for her to get approval and admiration. But I think that her ADHD brain holds her back. Mostly she plays because she wants to have fun with her friends - it's hard for me to get her to be motivated to do the things she needs to do to get better. That's what I want her to do, not what she wants to do. I tried to get her to like climbing, but she doesn't.
I coached her soccer teams for her first 8 seasons, but now she's moved on to a competitive team with a real coach who knows what he's doing. He's making her play keeper, her least favorite position, because (I agree) she could be good at it, if she wanted to. But she doesn't. She's a natural motivated fierce center back - in goal she looks like she'd rather be somewhere else. The coach is not impressed by her coachability. I worry that what he's teaching her is that she doesn't like soccer.
She likes basketball. She just did a weeklong camp where she won a trophy for most improved in her group of 40 kids. Her team won the 3 v 3 tournament against mostly boys. The (mostly black) coaches graded her highest in Character (which was described as attitude, coachability, and mental toughness).
She has a soccer teammate, a little 8 yr old white girl, who is awesome! OMFG that kid is a warrior on the field - smart, skilled, fast, persistent, tireless, tough. Love to watch her play - she's got it all working together. Sweetheart of a kid - fun, goofy, friendly - I've never seen her foul anyone - she doesn't need to - she's just that good. Her parents say that she's bossy. Good for her.
She's not like my daughter. Once I turned around at practice to see a parent running onto our practice field yelling at my daughter "no you can't do that!" after she purposefully knocked one of her teammates (scrimmaging on the opposite team) down (I hadn't seen it). The girl had (accidentally?) knocked one of my daughter's friends down, and my daughter was pissed about it, and was retaliating to defend her friend. As much as I admire her, not something that I am allowed to admire about her.
We have a friend who plays on a premier league youth soccer team. At a recent soccer tournament an opposing player said to her "shut up black girl, you f*#king nigger." Coaches refs parents players heard her say it - she admitted saying it at the time - there was no dispute about what she had said. But the site manager and tournament director from our friend"s club that organized the tournament allowed the offending player to continue playing in the tournament with no repercussions (in FIFA it would be a minimum 5 game suspension). The offending girl's coach said "this is not how we behave" even though he had just witnessed his team behaving that way. Our friend's club added a new "zero tolerance for racism" policy, even though they had just tolerated this racism. Nike lists the club as one of the 60 best soccer clubs in the U.S. Our friend withdrew from the club because she just didn't feel like the club had her back.
I think a lot of times how we choose to see other people really says more about ourselves and who we are than it says about those other people and who they are. If we acknowledge that we judge climbers by their "balls", then sure, we're going to blame women for the dumbing down of climbing - they don't have balls. But I don't think that's about them, it's about us and how we choose to see our balls and ourselves.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:03pm PT
|
I’m coming back (whhhhhhhhhy I do!!!??!!) only because one of my pet peeves is when people cherry-pick sentences from science articles to make broad generalizations. I can’t tell whether he be trollin’, be serious, or be seriously trollin’…but here’s a fact check:
clearly been shown, and recently reviewed that women show higher anxiety in comparison to men (Mchenry et al., 2014)
I skimmed the McHenry article over lunch, along with the other ones, and the continuing lolfest that is this thread (again, why I do!!?). As far as I could tell, it was referring to the incidence of clinical anxiety, not the average anxiety of women.
Men are 9Xs more likely to commit homicide then women, but that doesn't mean that I'm about to stop climbing with men because I think they're going to kill me when no one is looking.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:09pm PT
|
What is it about the first ascent that makes it (seem) more important an issue to men as opposed to women?
It's an interesting question, DMT. I'm struggling to come up with an answer that doesn't rely on generalizations that I don't actually believe in. There's the nonsensical "men just want to claim their conquest!!" but that statement's just as absurd as "women like comfort!" (And we have plenty of counterexamples right in front of us: the masters of spray on this website are also the people who seem to love the mountains most earnestly and without pretense.) Maybe it only seems more important to men because of a very vocal internet minority?
I'm a bit amused by the question, too: you also emphasized up-thread that you were part of a very different generation from mine, but having read how you talk about climbing, I'm pretty sure we're motivated by very similar things. :) Which, I think, are the same reasons The Chief likes fly fishing.
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:20pm PT
|
Cherry-pick this my friend (from the same study you claim to "fact-check" Hint for you: Calling something a "fact check" and presenting no actual facts or dispute of facts, only a misunderstanding of how study methodology is chosen, does not, in FACT, constitute a "fact check". FACT).
approximately 18% of the adult American population suffers from an anxiety-related disorder and another 7% from major depressive disorder each year (Kessler et al., 2005b). Further, females are more than twice as likely as males to be afflicted by mood disorders (Kessler et al., 2005a, Bekker and van Mens-Verhulst, 2007). These sex differences are observed, not only in the U.S., but are also documented worldwide (Seedat et al., 2009). This sex disparity indicates a potential role for gonadal hormones in the etiology of anxiety and depressive disorders. In fact, studies have revealed that women are more likely to experience mood disturbances, anxiety, and depression during times of hormonal flux, such as puberty, menopause, perimenstrual and post-partum periods (Ahokas et al., 2001, Parker and Brotchie, 2004, Douma et al., 2005, Solomon and Herman, 2009). While hormonal flux in females appears to increase the likelihood of experiencing mood disturbances, clinical and preclinical studies in males suggest that testosterone yields protective benefits against anxiety and depression.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:26pm PT
|
Elcapinyoazz (lol), I'm just gonna quote myself, because I don't know if you saw it the first time, and I really don't think depression or anxiety is what's stopping someone from climbing--more likely it motivates them--
(2) I've heard a lot of people throw around the idea that climbers are a bit nuts, or that they're drawn to the wilderness because they have trouble settling down like a "normal" person. Climbing....calms us down. I suspect many of us are afflicted with that existential anxiety that can't seem to be assuaged by a paycheck, and learning to deal with uncertainty and fear while adventure climbing does a lot to help diffuse the anxiety about life :)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:32pm PT
|
Exactly, "likely" means incidence of a disorder, not average level of mood or anxiety--although the incidence would impact the average.
Men are also 1.5X's more likely to suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder besides being 9Xs more likely to commit homicide ;P
The same article showed that testosterone had little effect on men's depression/anxiety, and also stated that:
The high number of relevant publications also indicates that it is a hot topic of interest. However, quantity is not quality and currently, despite numerous publications it is very difficult to conclude how testosterone affects cognitions and emotions...But based on our humble experience, the negative results will probably be more common than the published positive ones. And if the contradictory published findings are added, the picture gets even more confusing.
Also, if climbers are 1-2% of the population (about 500,000 in the US) and we can probably all agree it's a self-selecting population, then discussing averages might not even be that relevant.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:43pm PT
|
I think there is a very complex social interaction / recognition / ego component to it.
No doubt, but I suspect you think it's a larger component then is suggested by this statement. And you may be right for a lot of folks, particularly these days where you have to a 'developer' and 'community service' into the mix.
take away the reporting aspect of first ascents. Let's pretend for a moment that we can't report, or there is no means of reporting or recording any first ascents at all. Who would still be out there establishing them?
I would, and I can honestly say not a single FA of mine was driven by a thirst for recognition - they have all been a result of seeing something that caught my eye and getting entirely obsessed about it. And I've never put up a route with any regard to the possibility anyone else may be interested in climbing it. Some we never even reported and were bolted, uprated, and claimed as an FA and renamed as a result. Happens and someone else got to have an FA experience on it. For that matter I asked that my more recent FAs be left out of a new guidebook (the author declined).
Not really a driver for me though I'm sure the drivers and impetus for FAs vary widely across the board.
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:45pm PT
|
Ladies, there is no shortage of scientific backing on the idea that men are more "adventurous". You try, in vain, to poke holes in the research, but we could play this game all day.
Harris et al 2006:
The existence of gender differences in propensity to take
risks has been documented in a large number of questionnaire
and experimental studies. For example, a metaanalysis
by Byrnes, Miller, and Schafer (1999) reviewed
over 150 papers on gender differences in risk perception.
They concluded that the literature “clearly” indicated that
“male participants are more likely to take risks than female
participants” (p. 377).
Rahmani 2012:
Male students showed significantly higher scores on subscales of thrill and adventure seeking, disinhibition and boredom susceptibility than female students.
Cross et al 2013:
Men score higher than women on measures of sensation-seeking, defined as a willingness to engage in novel or intense activities.
Then again, them Black Friday and after-xmas sales at Neiman Marcus DO seem a riotous adventure and nary a man to be seen (aside from a few of our aforementioned metro snags and sad-sack married shopping bag caddies).
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 01:56pm PT
|
I like these questions. I think there are extremely varied answers for different people.
Happens and someone else got to have an FA experience on it. The phrase "FA experience" is a great one. Healyje, I don't know you beyond this thread, but from what you're saying I bet you would be utterly unconcerned if someone told you they did one of your unreported FAs before you. Trying to own the rock isn't really the point. Exploring the rock is the point.
It's almost like we've gone full circle in terms of climbing style over the generations: from "conquer-siege the mountain (in the name of your country) by any means necessary!!" to "climb quickly with grace and clean gear" to "beat that sport climb into submission (in the name of your sponsor) by any means necessary!!"
I've noticed a lot of my female friends are motivated by "proving someone wrong." I love these women, and I understand where that idea comes from, but I also think it's a toxic sort of motivation.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:01pm PT
|
How would we climb if no one was watching, ever. If we'd never even heard of climbing: we'd all be scrambling around on fourth class having picnics, probably? (And without noticing, considering scarier and scarier things fourth class?)
But I'm glad there are people bragging about doing more than that, or I may not've imagined it was possible.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:10pm PT
|
a lot do what we do in climbing comes from the ego's need for recognition
I'm certainly not going to sit here and argue that there isn't a component of that in my climbing. But on the other hand my parents said raising me as an infant before I could walk was a constant chore of getting me down from things and that continued on through out my childhood in suburban Boston and Chicago, I was constantly up trees and climbing on buildings before I was ever exposed to 'climbing' or even thought of it.
As a teen my bedroom had a deck off it with tree alongside of it that went two stories up and then a branch hovered over the roof. I was always taking it up to the roof and never thought twice about it. I did it again on a visit home after climbing for a year and ended up backing off the traverse to the roof thinking I must have been either a lot lighter or just stupid. Never did it again.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:16pm PT
|
I did it again on a visit home after climbing for a year and ended up backing off the traverse to the roof thinking I must have been either a lot lighter or just stupid.
Hahaha I totally identify with this. The solid-seeming things I confidently climbed when I was a gangly teenager did not seem so solid when I returned to the ranch as an adult...
My father, recently: "I never wanted to chastise Caitlin when she was balance-beaming across the top of the swing set because I was afraid if I yelled at her she'd fall off." (That thing was literally rotting. I don't know how I'm alive.)
Competition and ego, are the fuel that fires the advancement of climbing. I think this is true--but I also think that awareness of those things makes them a positive influence. "Competition" has a bit of a nasty connotation in my mind, but it needn't. Friendly competition is great. We advance society, knowledge, climbing, etc. by challenging each other--what we think, what we think is possible--
At least for me, the desire to suck less is not because I want to be better than anyone. It's because what the better people are doing looks really fun...
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:17pm PT
|
I worked on a photo shoot with her years ago in Red Rocks, and the DP wanted her on a particular route for the shot. The first bolt was about twenty feet off the deck, she balked at clipping it and asked me to do it for her. So I soloed up to it in my tennies and clipped her rope through it for her. Only time I ever climbed with her, if you wanna call it that.
True story.
Route and year or it never happened. I call bullshet. Seriously. I seen Bobbi highball stuff onsight that would make any grown modern day boulderer walk away shaking their heads.
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:23pm PT
|
Healyj,
Good thing there weren't any climbing gyms when you grew up or you would have instantly turned into a sport climbing pu$$y the moment your hands touched the plastic.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:36pm PT
|
Metro snags and shopping bag caddies...HA! nice one pumpinleadintoyurdumper
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 02:39pm PT
|
I would really like to have that pint with you sometime, too.
Ditto, work ever bring you to PDX?
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 03:16pm PT
|
maybe you're not competing to be the most strong, but perhaps the most 'pure' or whatever? be honest now.
Nooo I was gonna say this and you beat me to it ;)
|
|
The Chief
climber
Lurkerville east of Goldenville
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 04:16pm PT
|
Thus is never happened. Got it. Thanks Kevin.
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 04:27pm PT
|
Chick's a buffed out sport climber. In case you haven't noticed it takes more than that to climb with no pro and ground fall potential.
wait, lemme guess what that more is...
...is it balls aka sac?
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 04:30pm PT
|
yeah a big old ball sack with Harry prickly chicken skin stretched thin from the enormity.
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 05:27pm PT
|
or was it 'the time of the month' that made her scared?
or are you butthurt cuz she had better abs than you and can climb 5.14? or maybe your man boobs are bigger than hers before she got a boob job?
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 07:11pm PT
|
Ladies, don’t worry—it’s been scientifically proven if you chop enough bolts you will drop a pair of testicles and your chest hair will finally come in…
Now that I got that out of my system…there’s no doubt that women are different from men. I don’t think that’s a bad thing. However, the variance between different women is huge, as is the variance between different men. That’s why the fact we’re talking about 1-2% of the population matters.
You can look at the papers on risk-adversity, but at the same time, that doesn’t really get to the why of the question. I really doubt we’re going to solve the centuries old problem of nature versus nurture in a ST thread.
There was a really interesting study about competiveness by an economics professor—another allegedly “masculine” trait (John List). He looked at two tribes, the Maassai, a hyper patriarchal society that would make BB look progressive, and the Khasi, a matriarchal society where women make all major business decisions. Not only were the women more competitive than the men in the Khasi culture, they were actually more competitive than the men of the Maassai.
People used to use phrenology to make “scientific” claims that women and people of color were inferior. Context matters, and is incredibly hard to study. So, really, all I’m try to say is be thoughtful about how you use science to make broad generalizations about groups of people.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 07:17pm PT
|
The "discussion" seems to have settled on first ascents as defining climbing, which is interesting in the context of the OP title:
"maturing of climbing as a sport & the rise of gyms"
where I have emphasized the qualification. Climbing as a sport is not so much about first ascents, or adventure, or boldness or seeking risks. For the most part "sports" are about athletic performance, and usually sporting competition minimizes the risk of injury for the athletes who are participating.
The issue of managing risk and minimizing it has a lot of publicity lately in the concussion injuries that many sports are coming to terms with, football and soccer to name two. One could claim a lack of "boldness" in the participants, but then what does that mean? playing football without a helmet? Probably not at the level the game is played now, and probably with many more career ending injuries... can football players who wear helmets be accused of being "wimps"? They are undeniably athletes.
The Voge guide 1954 guide described 75 routes in the Valley, Roper 1964 has 273, and Roper's 1971 guide had 479, which is about the time Kevin was hitting the Valley. Meyers' 1982 guide was a "Select" and had 808 routes... and was about the time that Kevin was moving on. By 1994 the Reid guide had 1538 routes, and in 2015 we are looking at about 3000 routes.
It is possible that route production will taper off, but it remains a major activity for a relatively few climbers. First Ascents are not an "athletic endeavor" per se, and FA teams have many, diverse reasons for seeking out and producing new routes. During Kevin's time in the Valley it probably defined what "climbing" was: putting up new routes. And many of those routes also broke through to new heights of athletic performance.
FA's are probably the aspect of climbing most prone to objective dangers in rock climbing. Exploring new places subjects the FA team to physical risk, loose rock, dirty, vegetated cracks and ledges, unstable formations incapable of providing secure anchors, exposure to storms, and all that. On top of that, there is the real possibility that the intended line may not be possible once the FA team arrives on the route, the risk of expending time and energy and resources to a lost cause.
Many new route possibilities require a great deal of "research," as is the case in Yosemite Valley today. This means familiarizing yourself with all the areas in the Valley and assessing the route possibilities. This takes time out of "climbing."
Then there are the real risks of injury in falls, situations which are difficult to assess because the route is unknown, and the risks difficult (or impossible) to guess.
This describes the activity of "climbing" in very different terms than "a sport," it is an adventure activity with the very real risk of injury or death for the participants. This activity is incomparable to the "sport" that gym climbers participate in... while many of the athletic aspects are similar, a gym climber has a lot more to learn going outside and participating in the adventure aspects of climbing. A gym climber may concentrate on perfecting their athletic performance to a higher degree than an outdoor adventure climber.
This has nothing to do with gender, at least in my experience. I know a lot of women who lead FA teams, who do seek out the adventure and who accept the risks that are inherent in putting up new routes. They may have started out as gym climbers, or they may have found a mentor and/or learned more like what Kevin described as his climbing education.
A lot of climbs, even reported, are not repeated, there are still climbs in the 1994 Reid's guide that have seen few or no repeats. There are climbs that have become classics (and Kevin has many in the Valley). The bar is raised as an area is developed, the technical difficulties increase, and the comparison to other "classics" define a type of climb for the area that may be a limited resource.
I think that the gender issue is probably a diversion from the actual issue of the difference between climbing as a sport and climbing as an adventure (as I have narrowly defined it here as an activity with inherent risk of failing to have a successful outcome, including the possibility of injury or death).
What we recognize as "climbing" today is larger than climbing as defined by Kevin circa 1970s in Yosemite Valley.
There are still legitimate issues regarding gender specificity in risk taking, and in motivations, and in tendencies to "spray" about accomplishments. What is a bit refreshing in this thread is the participation of both men and women, as opposed to Kevin's youth when men made up the definitions and judged worthiness on their terms.
why am I posting to this thread? because my name showed up in a post that was also quoted...
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 07:21pm PT
|
|
|
Todd Eastman
climber
Bellingham, WA
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 08:17pm PT
|
It is OK for climbing to be fun...
... and not always some deep character building near dance with death!
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 08:20pm PT
|
Yeah ^^^^
Warbler .... WTF are you doing in that garage?
:-)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 08:28pm PT
|
@Jim, it was a super simple measure of competitiveness. I didn't go detailed with it, because I wasn't sure anyone would really be that interested. Pretty much what they did was they had a bucket and ping pong balls. You could either get $1 dollor per ball you got into the bucket playing by yourself or you could go $3 per ball if you competed against another person and won. If you lost while competing with someone, then you got no money.
A lot of the studies that are cited are super simplistic, including John List's, but what you're trying study isn't and it's also hard to define. That's part and parcel of the point I was trying to make, which is that context matters and it's dangerous to use research to make generalizations about people. Just look at the entire sh!t show that was the field of eugenics.
My grandmother decided in her 40's that she was going to learn how to climb, so she took her entire family to the Dolomites. That's where my mom learned to hammer pitons--she was the only one of her four brothers/sisters who took to leading and stuck with it.
It's really clear from the thread and any number of articles that climbing is changing, but it's always been changing. Just picture Norman Clyde posting on super topo...
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 08:38pm PT
|
Didn't you know that US surveillance satellites can read license plates from way up there.
I just pointed the lens onto your property and eureka !!! saw everything ......
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:49pm PT
|
thank you for the work you've done and the time and money you have put in over the years to give us climbs to do. I appreciate it.
Edit:
Agree about Mr. Hartouni, as always
|
|
rgold
Trad climber
Poughkeepsie, NY
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 09:57pm PT
|
I find Ed's comments to be the most insightful so far. Climbing is becoming more and more of a conventional sport, with performance emphasized and risk avoided. Surely bolted sport climbs are the primary ingredient in this change, and pre-teens may be the primary beneficiaries.
One peculiar thing about the argument here is that if Kevin were right about women being in some way more risk-averse, then it would follow that the new lower-risk sporting aspect of climbing would attract women in greater numbers, which would then make him wrong about women as a taming influence; their increased numbers would simply testify to the appeal of an already-established new genre.
Anyway, I'm from the East Coast where women have been kicking ass since before WWII. Here's a quote I'm guessing Kevin would like, from an accomplished leader of the prewar years:
"Where there is a genuine penalty for failure, you have to be a real man to play at all. You must have experience, skill, strength, courage and, above all, those moral qualities of self-knowledge and self-control."
The leader: Miriam Underhill, who was perhaps better at coping with small holds than the proper deployment of pronouns.
Those prewar climbers, men and women, were up to some pretty damn raw adventures too. Hassler Whitney and Bradley Gillman climbed the still-impressive Whitney-Gillman without placing anything for protection or anchors. Looping the rope over flakes was their only method of "safeguarding" the leader. Whitney subsequently climbed down the route that way as well. With floppy rope-soled shoes (sticky manila-yeah!) and short hemp ropes that would break in a leader fall, they needed 11 pitches for a route now graded 5.7. (It might have been 5.6 when they did it; some holds have broken.)
In addition to Miriam Underhill ("When I began climbing, we knew about pitons but didn't think nice people used them"), we got Betty Woolsey, Krist Raubenhiemer, Bonnie Prudden, Gerd Thuestad, Cherry Merrit, Barbara Devine, Rosie Andrews, Alison Osius, and Lynne Hill for a while, showin' over and over again, that "it goes, boys." I've climbed a bit with Rosie, as well as a number of famous persons from the Golden Age of Testosterone, and I'm here to testify (testicle-ify?) that no one had it together on hard scary runouts more than than Rosie.
Getting back to first ascents, I think that perhaps an item missed in the kerfluffle over women's role is that a major tenet of trad climbing, in the sixties especially, was the preservation of the first-ascent experience. For example, Chouinard, having no idea what the popularity of climbing would wreak, trumpeted the development of chrome-molly pitons, which, being removable and reusable, would enable every big-wall party to have the same experience as the first ascenders.
The combination of that preservation ethic, low climber density, little if any chalk on free pitches, and far less detailed information in general made many repeats of routes much more like first ascents than is the case now. And so, both men and women making subsequent ascents, especially early ones, were arguably involved in a more adventurous endeavor, one much closer to the first-ascent experience, than is the case today, and women's apparent low participation in first ascents ought to be viewed in that context.
|
|
tripmind
Boulder climber
San Diego
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:02pm PT
|
I don't think the NYT article is accurate in that gyms are maturing the sport. All gyms are doing in my view is opening up a different sport that many people would never take up in favor of hard granite. There is nothing wrong with that to be honest.
However this argument is surprisingly similar to the argument of "people that play shovelware games on their smartphones are gamers and should be considered in the overall headcount of people who play video games" when anyone who is passionate about that hobby will tell you its just a clickbait headline. Passionate gamers are not going to trade good videogames for shitty iphone apps.
In my town there are like 5 gyms, all within a 20-30 minute drive from one another, 2 of which have been opened in the past 2 years. It is a growing place for gyms, and the competition is definitely appreciated because for the few people like me who climb outside as much as possible, cheap daypasses is what I'm hounding for.
For the most part, everyone I've talked to in the gym has either had no experience climbing at the local spots, or have only sampled them, where gyms have provided the majority of their practice to that point. The part that scares me is that most of these people are kids from universities, not very different from my age, but they seem to have a mindset somewhere along the lines of "gym climbing is it, that's the best that climbing has to offer", or at the very least they come to gyms because it relieves them from committing to any form of time or money investment that is involved with doing a weekend trip which requires gas, time, food, and gear.
What I'm predicting here is that very few gym regulars are ever going to make a serious effort outside because it doesn't fit their lifestyle or they just aren't interested in adventure to begin with. It just seems like what gyms are doing for land preservation and access is totally marginal compared to what they're doing for gear companies and their own pockets. I could be wildly wrong, but I'm a pessimist by nature.
I appreciate gyms for what they've given me, but honestly gyms do not deliver even a single ounce of what real rock does without even trying. If I could trade every hour I've spent in a gym for a single awesome weekend trip with some buddies I'd do it in a heartbeat, but my friends are all growing up, getting married and getting tied down, that sort of crap.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:14pm PT
|
so you're saying Gym climbers are big pussies that will never go outdoors because they don't have enough time money gear and gas?
Just kidding thanks for playing
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:25pm PT
|
Jim, when I read your post I laughed so hard, and I think you would be laughing with me if you realized I was actually just being too sincere for supertopo (probably why I've always been a lurker, not a poster)--except for the obvious troll about chopping bolts to grow testicles and few other comments that were meant playful/serious earlier in the thread.
I'm not even sure who is trolling who at this point. All I know is that Ed Hartouni is an adult in the room--his posts have a way of tying people and things together.
Here is a link to where I first heard about the study I mentioned, even though I know that it sounds like a drinking game and not research, but that's why it's good to question behavioral scientists:
http://freakonomics.com/2013/02/24/women-are-not-men-a-new-freakonomics-radio-podcast/
The story about my grandmother and my mother both climbing is also true. I just love mountains, dislike the misuse of research and don't have any hard feelings to anyone on this thread. (That includes you Kevin!)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:35pm PT
|
The combination of that preservation ethic, low climber density, little if any chalk on free pitches, and far less detailed information in general made many repeats of routes much more like first ascents than is the case now. And so, both men and women making subsequent ascents, especially early ones, were arguably involved in a more adventurous endeavor, one much closer to the first-ascent experience, than is the case today, and women's apparent low participation in first ascents ought to be viewed in that context.
What a wonderfully articulated summary of the change! Thanks for a couple thoughtful posts, Ed & rgold.
It seems the availability of more information and technology development can both push forward the discipline and and also seriously constrain one's thinking about it. Once an activity becomes large enough, with a lot of readily available information, I think the idea of adding to that knowledge base becomes much more formidable to the average participant.
I have always found the notion that women are equal to men to be preposterous. Not trying to harp endlessly on you, man, I promise! Just wanted to say that, at least from the perspective of this female human, the goal is to achieve equal treatment and equal opportunities for men and women, not to assert that they are exactly the same.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 24, 2015 - 11:48pm PT
|
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 12:02am PT
|
|
|
Srbphoto
climber
Kennewick wa
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 07:42am PT
|
It is OK for climbing to be fun...
... and not always some deep character building near dance with death!
+1
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 08:11am PT
|
Woah. What a gem. Arguments, trolls, name droppings, chest pounding, graphs and scientific studies. I love it.
For those who only climb in gyms I feel sorry for. They're missing the spirit of the sport. It has always been a sport of nature and wilderness enjoyment, outdoor adventure, discovery, risk, and finding your personal limits. Climbing was always badass more so than any other sport. If you know climbing history you know this to be true. Depends on the generation in question and in context.
You know I hike a very well known mountain here San Diego several times a week and I boulder up and down the mountain for a really good all around workout. Seems I'm the only one doing so. It's not Woodson. The boulders aren't as big, but there are some great gems for sure.
Well one early morning I'm doing so and bouldering right off the trail, and a group of younger hot looking women come hiking by. The tallest prettiest one says, "Wow, I never thought about climbing here before, I've only climbed in a gym." I smiled at her and told her, "I would never admit to that if I were you." She said, "Sad huh?" "Yea. Gyms are great and get you really strong, but your're meant to use those skills outside. Look around. There are a lot of really fun good boulders here and it's free." She smiled.
I always thought climbing on boulders, scrambling around local hills and cragging in Yosemite was training for climbing real mountains. Like those with double cornices and altitude above 19,000ft. If you never climbed a real mountain like that, I feel sorry for you. The time you spent bouldering around is a complete waste if you don't apply those skills on faces that can kill you. Objective danger has to be high and protection shitty. If you never rapped from a snow picket in powder snow or a one inch deep v thread in rotten ice, you must be a complete dipsh#t.
Attempt at satire through tongue in cheek humor...
Seems like everyone has a different drive. Different idea of what is too scary or fun. It is a personal satisfaction that each individual seeks from climbing. Different people have different motivations and different interpretation of what is it that they as individual want to achieve in climbing. Any sort of climbing can keep one healthy and mentally a bit more stable. Some could do it because it is something better than being preoccupied with thoughts of suicide and some could do it because it could be, well, damn fun!
By the way, many would benefit from reading The Warrior's Way. It has helped me to recognize when my own ego is getting in the way and be more honest with myself and others. Some good stories and tips to decrease the fear of falling or failing. Helps one grow a sack and be a real man, unlike those leg humping latte sipping transvestites found in your local gym, usually preoccupied with pleasing women. :)
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 08:28am PT
|
So I'm interested in your data Ed - the simple number of first ascents in Yosemite which included female names, compared to the number of first ascents.
ugh, I'll try, but teasing out gender from names is an exercise fraught with problems... tried it once in a thread somewhere around here and was utterly discouraged... thought lots of corrections...
Kevin, what has changed and what has not changed?... I'm not sure the numbers of FA seeking climbers, in absolute terms, has changed that much over the decades, but the vast majority of climbers now do not participate in FAs.... as the fraction of women climbers has increased, so has their participation in FAs... but let me see if I can quantify that.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 08:30am PT
|
(I thought we were completely trolling each other with our first two posts about gender, and I hoped this thread was going to about climbing as "sport" versus "discipline." My first post is mostly about that, actually...)
During the early climbing days that rgold described, women were not expected to or encouraged to participate in "sport" as we know it. As Ed H pointed out more eloquently than I, climbing was not really a sport then. I think the fact that ANY women participated in adventure climbing speaks not to the adventurousness or athleticism of women (or of men), but to the appeal of climbing itself. No matter what generalizations one believes about men and women, something about that style of climbing clearly appeals to a small subset of both genders, even if it seems to run contrary to societal expectations of athleticism and independence.
It is not at all surprising that the demographic drawn to climbing-as-sport and climbing-as-adventure is very different, but I don't think gender is the interesting dividing line.
Gender actually might be an interesting divide in high-risk sport in general, but I don't know the numbers, I'm not familiar with those sports, and even then the debate will still flounder when it reaches the "nature v nurture" question.'
Ed: yikes, I could see that analysis being a total bear with names like "Chris," "Jan," Lauren"...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:08am PT
|
Hey DMT,
If you and your climbing girlfriends were sitting talking shop about climbing, no men around, do you or would you encourage or be encouraged to do risky climbs, first ascents, and possibly be overtly competitive with one another? I am sure that the conversation sounds a bit different when it's just a bunch of women. I think we do less aggressive sh#t-talking; we certainly do some, but it's very obviously facetious.
The rest, though, seems about the same. There's a lot of celebration of those who "get after it," we regale each other with adventure-tales, and we dream up crazy adventures. Perhaps the competition is stated less explicitly, but I think we're doing the same thing y'all are: bragging about our accomplishments and, in the process, lighting a competitive fire for our companions. We just like to pretend we're not competitive and use the word "inspiration" instead.
We discuss motivation and the mental aspect of climbing a fair bit too. I don't have any idea if men do that.
EDIT:
I think instead of sh#t-talking we do more of the "stern no-nonsense encouragement." If someone reports they've been feeling off, climbing poorly, or feeling unmotivated (all things we do talk about openly), the typical response is lovingly aggressive. "Why? How are we going to fix it? You love this activity and you are not allowed to stop trying hard, no debate."
Hope that answers your question.
Cheers,
Cat
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:22am PT
|
You guys would get along fine in real life.
My guess is that Kevin and Caitlin have more in common with each other than some person walking down the street in a suit of their same respective gender (unless that person is a climber).
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:23am PT
|
That's what climbers with balls talk about.
not all climbers with balls have balls... apparently (in my experience)
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:25am PT
|
we regale each other with adventure-tales, and we dream up crazy adventures
Obviously implicit in this statement is the fact that we talk about rock character, pitch quality, sketchy pro, location of cliffs and lines, etc. That's an essential part of the "adventure-tale."
Also no mention of trying to come up with route names that have sexual connotations that haven't already been used by some other guy. We also (gasp, who would think) make crude jokes about crack climbing, route names, and the unique challenges of wilderness sex and wilderness periods.
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:35am PT
|
Helps one grow a sack and be a real man, unlike those leg humping latte sipping transvestites found in your local gym, usually preoccupied with pleasing women. :)
agreed. Those sac-less 5% body fat gym climbers obsessed with plastic grades should aspire to be pudgy, beer swilling, 5.8, 10 on a good day, gear obsessed, crusty steep hikers, preoccupied with sharing a sleeping bag and toothbrush with men, ready to spoon for survival ... aka entry level alpinists
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:41am PT
|
I agree that climbing has become a sport......1% doing it and 99% talking about it is proof for me.
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:46am PT
|
I don't know if this goes for all women, but I notice that women support and encourage each other to find their limits and push past them, and celebrate and find inspiration in each success.
There is a kind of competition there, but it's definitely different than the competition I've seen and heard around men.
"You can do it!" as opposed to, "you're lacking balls if you don't"
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 10:11am PT
|
Wow, my comment was certainly not meant to trigger anyone's issues. Sorry!
But I remember hanging out waiting for a climb in Indian Creek, where a more seasoned guy had put his noob partner on his first crack ever, which was 5.9+, and included wide sections, and his approach was to allow him to sink or swim and the poor guy was getting the sh** kicked out of him.
I just can't remember ever seeing two women do that to each other. Not saying it doesn't ever happen though.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 10:15am PT
|
"You can do it!" as opposed to, "you're lacking balls if you don't" Daphne, I agree that women usually phrase their encouragement in terms of inspiration versus competition, but do you think the two are fundamentally any different? I think men are just as supportive of their friends' successes, they're just using a different set of words to say the same thing. And we're just as competitive, we're just using friendlier words.
his approach was to allow him to sink or swim My female friends and I do a decent amount of this, but with encouragement. But also heckling. Heckling of love.
I am curious if there's a difference in the way men and women talk about what their limits are and how to push past them. I think we're dealing with the same challenges though.
What an interesting application of the word "gushing" to an extremely matter-of-fact sentence...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 10:55am PT
|
You'd make an excellent bawdy bard, dear frenemy.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:24am PT
|
the SuperTopo guide to the Taming of the Shrew?
eh, doubt it would sell well.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:38am PT
|
agreed. Those sac-less 5% body fat gym climbers obsessed with plastic grades should aspire to be pudgy, beer swilling, 5.8, 10 on a good day, gear obsessed, crusty steep hikers, preoccupied with sharing a sleeping bag and toothbrush with men, ready to spoon for survival ... aka entry level alpinists
You almost get it bro. Now let's bring it down a notch and be honest. We don't actually climb 5.8 unless it is in the gym or our 'strong' buddy leads it. The 10 is a mythical rating we have seen Bridwell climb, in a photo. But we can still offer our expert opinion on the internet, so it is all good.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:54am PT
|
Vitaliy, the emperor should be downgraded to 5.8+, since trad climbers can't do anything harder than that :)
|
|
patrick compton
Trad climber
van
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 12:46pm PT
|
But we can still offer our expert opinion on the internet, so it is all good.
seriously though, I have a lot of respect for alpinism. I just personally don't like to suffer that much.
I don't really understand why so many gym rats don't want to be outdoors either. I primarily boulder and sport climb, but even that level seems to be too much of an effort for many gym minions.
I think that's great though. People like the climbing gym as an alternative to other sorts of fitness activities. Fine with me if they don't go outside, more line-free routes for me, and I don't have to cringe watching bad belaying.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 01:25pm PT
|
I have no idea why 99% of you craggers don't climb real mountains like real men should. Yes it is nice and sunny in Yosemite. Where you feel comfortable 10 minutes from your car in your bikini. Glad I can have those high mountains and unclimbed faces to myself, without the presence of you Generator crack top roping and aid climbing as#@&%es. Be happy Bonatti is not here to witness this sh#t show....crag on boys.
:)
|
|
Splater
climber
Grey Matter
|
|
Topic Author's Reply - Aug 25, 2015 - 02:19pm PT
|
"For the most part, everyone I've talked to in the gym has either had no experience climbing at the local spots, or have only sampled them, where gyms have provided the majority of their practice to that point. The part that scares me is that most of these people are kids from universities, not very different from my age, but they seem to have a mindset somewhere along the lines of "gym climbing is it, that's the best that climbing has to offer", or at the very least they come to gyms because it relieves them from committing to any form of time or money investment that is involved with doing a weekend trip which requires gas, time, food, and gear.
... very few gym regulars are ever going to make a serious effort outside because it doesn't fit their lifestyle or they just aren't interested in adventure to begin with. It just seems like what gyms are doing for land preservation and access is totally marginal compared to what they're doing for gear companies and their own pockets. I could be wildly wrong, but I'm a pessimist by nature."
In the first place, it is a VERY good thing that all these people are not crowding the crags. Gyms are very low environmental impact compared to what happens outdoors, which can get attention from those who want to restrict access, especially in California.
In the second place, frequent roadtrips are very time-consuming and not necessarily a wise use of time for someone who likes climbing as a recreational sport and not an entire lifestyle. There's nothing scary about this. In fact I'd say that it's the norm and that climbing as a lifestyle is outside the norm. It is a given that only a small percent of people are really going to get involved in anything beyond their own immediate interest.
That said, in the third place, gyms do a lot to help with outdoor issues and education. Maybe you should check out the board of directors of the SDRPF before assuming so much. At recent trail & cleanup days, many attended as a result of publicity by gyms. Usually gyms are happy to promote and help with events, but that does require someone (yourself?) to get involved, such as to make plans with the land managers. Local issues are an opportunity where someone can actually make a difference (not the same as big national issues).
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 02:34pm PT
|
Trad ladies swoon. Mike, that's actually fainting, and it's caused by the smell of your manky TC pros
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 02:53pm PT
|
I guess sirens, being of the sea, lack olfaction.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 03:24pm PT
|
I deserve to get kicked out of the van so many times over for cyberbullying you...
long pants rolled short, long sleeves rolled short, and then that argyle sock + trad shoe combo? Girls go cray.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 03:33pm PT
|
His sock/sweater combos were on a whole other level, man! I bet he appreciated the effort that goes into knitting.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 03:48pm PT
|
Saving myself for a nice pair of sculpted calves. Fulfilling your mother's secondary wish, then, eh? ;)
The rolled pants are even better when comically asymmetrical. So authentic.
|
|
Matt's
climber
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 03:50pm PT
|
YOU two need to bang already and get it over with. +1
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 03:52pm PT
|
MATT, UGH.
I'm gonna start belaying you like you belay me.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 04:04pm PT
|
Yes Vitaliy, there's nothing like training on the stunning shunts down at the Cookie before going off to Mount Sir Donald.
Sir Donald? You'd have to do it in winter with a sled and a box of whiskey on your back to consider it a real mountain climb, Jim. Real men climb peaks that see more deaths than recorded summits, Jim. Climb one of those than maybe you could compare the experience to the bad assery of your local car camping cragstars.
When you go to sleep to a sight of one of these summit ridges you have to accept that your close ones may get your body, if you can call it a body, in a month, if they are exceptionally lucky. Pre climb coffee has to taste a bit like death before the 1am summit push and you should enjoy it, if you are a real man, Jim. It is easy to un-tame the personal climbing experience, if you want it. So do you want to be a real man or would it be easier to wrap your paw around a warm coffee mug and yap about the boring aspects of modern-day gym climbing?
If any of you trad warriors feel like the climbing has became somewhat of a dull experience, move the iphone away from your mug and ask yourself when was the last time you personally have faced a real challenge? There are healthier ways to deal with insecurity than projecting the blame towards gym climbers. Gym climbing is what it is, gym climbing. Nothing more nothing less. Like weight-lifting or doing cardio in the gym, to some it is training, to some it is a way to keep yourself occupied with some sort of an activity, to some it is fun way to keep your body fit. Remember, there is always someone out there able to one up your perceived hard-man image. Maybe that someone climbed in the gym last night and had a soy latte...it doesn't actually matter...
To summarize my post and the thread I don't need to do anything but to quote the duck!
This modern internet yappin stuff is stooopid.
YAP YUP!
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 04:13pm PT
|
When you go to sleep to a sight of one of these summit ridges you have to accept that your close ones may get your body, if you can call it a body, in a month, if they are exceptionally lucky.
I love challenges and managing risk, but when the proposition turns the subjective/objective risk ratio upside down, then success becomes as much a matter of luck and gambling as skill. Cool and works for a lot of people, but not really anything which interests me.
|
|
Matt's
climber
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 04:27pm PT
|
MATT, UGH.
I'm gonna start belaying you like you belay me.
PENALTY SLACK!
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 06:02pm PT
|
A guy who's climbed with Kauk will always have an inferiority complex about his calves, Kathy
Not sure about what Kauk is packing, but I got 20$ Pellucid Wombat's calves are bigger.
This actually MAY be my photo with his caption. Not 100% sure. But damn! If anyone has a fetish for mountaineer's calves, he is your guy!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 06:06pm PT
|
Obviously the maturing of climbing has only reached the prepubescent point Finally we agree about something ;)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:08pm PT
|
I doubt anyone is going to disagree with you that more men have put up FAs, but it still doesn't get at whether it's because of the general culture of the times those routes were put up.
But really, there's only one way to solve this...
SHOW US YOUR CALVES. Both of you. It's the only way we can judge.
|
|
Gary
Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 09:29pm PT
|
Seems there's more to climbing than Yosemite Valley. How do Wilts, Mendenhall and Lilley figure in your counting?
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 10:42pm PT
|
I was surprised to see one first credited to an all female team of three - Lower Arches Traverse, grade 1, 5.3, Krehe Ritter, Mara Unterman, and Judy Byers, August 1957.
They were allowed to do what??!! Obviously the real men were not around in August 1957. Why weren't those broads washing dishes and changing diapers?! What would Burt Bronson do if he found out...unfkingreal.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:02pm PT
|
Kevin, really no hard feelings, apology accepted. I think we can agree on a large number of things actually, but I also feel like the thread has been going in circles on this one. Here are some things I think we can agree on:
1) Women are not men, but are equal. Not all men are the same. Not all women are the same. There's some fraction in both populations that wants freedom/adventure/wildness.
2) Many FAs were put up in times when cultural norms for women did not encourage them to be adventurous. (To me this makes the women who pushed the limits even more bad @ss--they were counter counter culture.)
3) There's no scientific control for life, so we're never going to know nurture versus nature for women in climbing in the time period we're discussing...anything we say here is going to be speculation, but just the fact you're observing more adventurous women probably suggests to me that some part of it was cultural.
4) A lot of the low hanging FA/FFA fruit has been picked.
5) Climber humor is prepubescent. It looks like Vitaliy is trolling you again while I'm writing this overly long reply. This culture is probably why I feel comfortable with climbers :)
I'd still say that there are adventures to be had for the people who want it, as others pointed out, so many of those truly backcountry routes rarely get repeated. Some of them only have a paragraph description in an alpine club journal from the 70's, no pics.
That will take a long time, if ever, to change. I think it has to do with the distance to reach them, the length of a weekend, and how many people secretly enjoy or at least tolerate manzaneering/talus.
I'd be curious to see the rough number of people doing FA, FFAs, or alpine climbing with little beta. As a percent of the number of total climbers it's probably dropping just because of the increase in the total number of climbers, but it'd be interesting to see if the actual number of those people has changed. This post is now well into the obvious generalization territory that's been beaten many times in this thread and others...but climbing has always been changing, and people will always engage with it at different levels. I think that's ok. We get "cheats" people before us didn't, but then the things climbers as a whole can accomplish is also pushed forward. Sometimes I wonder what that limit is when I think of Uli Steck going up the South Face of Annapurna, or the Fitz Roy Traverse--it's kind of mind blowing.
The real question in my mind is how does a discipline that was largely based on mentorship handle a huge increase in the numbers of people who want to participate in it. There are a lot more climbers in gyms who would love to go outside then there are people who can or are willing to mentor them.
This is really longer than I meant it to be.
Kevin, peace--can we make this a virtual handshake/shot of whiskey?
P.S. Hopefully, I'll soon to be back to my life as a thread lurker....more calves
|
|
Ghost
climber
A long way from where I started
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:18pm PT
|
2) Many FAs were put up in times when cultural norms for women did not encourage them to be adventurous. (To me this makes the women who pushed the limits even more bad @ss--they were counter counter culture.)
No sh#t.
I've had the great good fortune of climbing with several women who pushed the limits, and agree that, given the times, they were indeed far more badass than the men who climbed a few grades harder and got their names in the magazines.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 25, 2015 - 11:57pm PT
|
5) Climber humor is prepubescent. It looks like Vitaliy is trolling you again while I'm writing this overly long reply. This culture is probably why I feel comfortable with climbers :)
I was not actually trolling Kevin in particular in my last post. He is right that women don't do as many first ascents as guys. That is a fact, obviously. WHY not, is the question that you guys can argue about.
Personally I would disagree with the claim that women made the modern climbers more tame. Guys wanted to get laid for a long time and I don't think they try to cater to women more than they did in the past, on average. Maybe they do, who knows, maybe one of you Stanford people could post some graph that could prove him right/wrong.
I'd be curious to see the rough number of people doing FA, FFAs, or alpine climbing with little beta.
AAJ is the annual source for that. You should get the current issue and see how many different FA teams are mentioned and calculate the number of women. If you are curious.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 12:42am PT
|
The real question in my mind is how does a discipline that was largely based on mentorship handle a huge increase in the numbers of people who want to participate in it
Quite poorly. Particularly in trad climbing where it can be real scary to watch sport crossovers giving it their first goes.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 01:21am PT
|
I decided Ed will probably succumb to the charms of Cat like so many others here have, give her a pass on her naïveté, and passively support her in the form of a lack of statistics to prove my point.
got tied up in work... sorry...
but I have met Cat (at the gym) and I've seen her outside (I believe)....
and I've met you too Kevin...
certainly true that the two of you have unequal charms...
no pass on stats... but wait until tomorrow (at the earliest)
|
|
Gary
Social climber
Hell is empty and all the devils are here
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:25am PT
|
Of course, Gary, there are more areas than Yosemite, I just happened to get stuck there for a few years, and had an old guidebook to reference. I did see Ellen Wilts' name on one or two routes in the Green Roper Guide.
I don't think its a whole lot different elsewhere,
Well, you might see Ellen Wilts and Barbara Lilley mentioned on some first ascents in the Canadian Rockies. That's adventure climbing, no? More adventurous than roadside climbing in Yosemite Valley.
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 07:06am PT
|
Just wanted to take a break to salute the awesome climbing work of Jan Conn. She's badass and her badassery started a LONG time ago!!
And don't forget Joanne Urioste. She's still killing it and has passed it on to her daughter.
|
|
Crimpergirl
Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 07:07am PT
|
^ Indeed! She was just in town too and still crushing!
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 07:19am PT
|
Why is that?
You're completely and absolutely wrong and have been 0wned by your own run a way mind.
Women are the only First Ascentionists period.
Men can't do sh!t without them.
They give birth, ..... so that you can spout your illusions here ........
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 08:37am PT
|
was not actually trolling Kevin in particular in my last post. He is right that women don't do as many first ascents as guys. That is a fact, obviously. WHY not, is the question that you guys can argue about. Personally I would disagree with the claim that women made the modern climbers more tame.
You're right, trolling is the wrong word, sorry about that V. It's more like you were calling him out for being "surprised," which I appreciated :)
WHY, is a question that's been beaten to death. I guess besides the list of things I can agree on with Kevin, there's also the list of things Kevin and I could agree to disagree on, but this is also in the rehash territory:
1.I'm always going to think that culture had a much larger influence on the number of women climbers pushing the edge in that period than innate biology.
2. I'm never going to agree with the original thesis that pulled me into this thread. Women making climbing more tame is still like claiming per capita cheese consumption is causing more deaths due to getting tangled up in bedsheets. Also, the reason I was curious about the first FA/FFA number, was to get at the question of is climbing getting more tame? If that number is steady, then maybe not. Also, going back to Ed's earlier post--if people are doing less FA/FFAs, it's probably more to do with amount of easily accessible FA/FFAs, not the number of women in climbing.
Also, does having women around make guys more or less likely to do stoopid sh!T?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifptOxN3gdI
WHEN BURT BRONSON SAYS SORRY YOU GRATEFUL REST OF LIFE. WHY WOMAN NO BRING COFFEE YET?????
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 08:38am PT
|
Guys (at least of the teenage variety) apparently want to get laid less than their parents, probably because they are all too busy dogging up their bedwetter gym bolted sport projects to care. Here is a graph.
I liked el cap ' s post on low testosterone levels. A logical explanation.
Seriously though, what has changed over time is the gender roles in society. United States at least. Especially when it comes down to choice of a career and priority. Women, on average, are a lot more independent and a lot more goal oriented than 30-50 years ago. While dropping out of college to raise kids, modern day women are way more likely to stick around work/career. Equality and independence go hand in hand IMO. Modern day women are a lot more independent than before.
As far as climbing and FAs...Rock climbing and alpinism, were looked as dangerous activities. On average it was just socially uncommon for females to participate in risky activities and many people today believe it is not a lady like activity to risk death riding bulls, joining the army or...climbing big mountains. I am fairly sure less women received the medal of honor too. Not because they can't or are inferior in some way, but because we are different physiologically, have hormonal differences and for the most part we are raised differently and value different things.
Gym climbing removed the risk out of climbing. It allowed the general public to step in the door. Some realize they could go outdoors and climb. Some move on to bouldering, sport or trad. The risk involved in doing long FAs deep in the backcountry is still there and we will continue to see less women than men participating in that sort of climbing, even though the number of women who find this sort of thing did rise and will rise in the future. Maybe they will have no low hanging fruit to cherry pick like 40 years ago, but there will always be sh#t to climb for those who are willing to think outside the box. The number will still lower in comparison due to the hormonal, physiological and social norms, not because women are inferior or less independent. Nature and nurture...
|
|
healyje
Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 09:09am PT
|
It's a spurious correlation.
Not quite sure how someone cannot see that it's the bolts which emasculated 'climbing'.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 09:36am PT
|
But burchey...nothing matters...
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 09:45am PT
|
Kevin, I don't have a Ten Sleep guidebook to check how many, but the obvious exception to the trend of women not developing routes/doing FAs is Alli Raney. Not sure if it's come up in this thread already or not.
Is a sport crag. Doesn’t really relate to adventure climbing, which was what Kevin touched on, in his initial statement. Putting up sport routes could be as easy and simple as putting up climbs at the gym. Of course it depends on the style and the character...but for the most part, it is not as risky as climbing a 2000 ft new route 15 miles from the closest road, out of cell reception and without any humans in sight for miles. BTW, how many female route setters are there in Planet Granite? 0? Why are there so many females operating the front desk but not setting routes?
|
|
Mike Friedrichs
Sport climber
City of Salt
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 09:51am PT
|
But if they want to show that female climbers are as adventurous as men, ON AVERAGE, or more so, then show me something, anything that proves that.
You aren't going to provide evidence to support that or refute that from a list of first ascents. You've got a denominator problem. Most first ascents were done by White people because most of the climbers at the time were White people. It doesn't prove or disprove one's proclivity for adventure.
It was, and still is a sexist world. Women still make .70 on the dollar. There were fewer women climbers in the 1970's because they were expected to have babies, raise families, take care of the men, all without compensation. No time for recreation. It's patently unfair to judge their "adventurousness" based on an activity they didn't even have much time to do.
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:25am PT
|
^^^Wait, you've been in the gym?
I keep trying to leave this thread and it just keeps sucking me back in! Going climbing this weekend though. But no first ascents planned.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:29am PT
|
The girls I've seen in the gym the last five years don't seem to fit your oppressed stereotype, especially the no time for recreation baby making part.
Let's say we agree about the cultural expectations and limitations that applied to the previous generation. Then--do you really think it's possible to have a complete cultural turnaround in one generation??
|
|
Mike Friedrichs
Sport climber
City of Salt
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:34am PT
|
Since the ratio of men to women climbers seems much more equitable now than in the 1970's, 1980's that seems like a more fair comparison.
Interestingly, the people I see in my gym are the same people I see every weekend at the crags and many are like me...not exactly young.
It may be that younger people are more "adventurous." I've observed that older climbers seem to take less risks once they have had a few serious injuries, or at least realize that they are not indestructible.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:34am PT
|
Also have you been to Wyoming man? Ten Sleep is like more in the middle no nowhere than SEKI :)
Yes. The approaches are shorter and the runouts are usually no longer than 3 ft.
|
|
Matt's
climber
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:47am PT
|
http://alpinist.com/doc/web15x/wfeature-smith-kadatz-free-climbing-in-baffin-island
gender equality is such a difficult subject. I think that everyone agrees men and woman are different (biologically), and that men and women should have the same opportunities.
The problem is that it is very hard to disambiguate between innate differences between the sexes and discrimination.
As a society, we have essentially given up trying to do this-- we just assume deviations from equal gender participation (etc...) are the result of (or a legacy of) discrimination.
Vitaliy-- yes, planet granite has almost no female route-setters. It is pretty much all young white dudes. Also notably absent are older people, non-white people, etc...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 10:56am PT
|
No, I'm saying that sort of shift takes longer than one generation, so the gap likely will not be entirely made up in this generation. I would expect an increase in the the number of women doing FAs or adventure climbing, but not an increase so large that it makes up the gap.
Taking part in an activity where your group (gender, race, age, whatever) is underrepresented presents an interesting set of challenges and pressures. Whether it's actually the case or not, it's easy to feel that you're some sort of ambassador responsible for the reputation of your group. That's a lot of pressure, a pressure that the majority group does not feel. It somehow doesn't feel acceptable to be in the minority and be just middling at the activity--if you're going to be breaking boundaries, you better be exceptional, or no one will ever take you seriously, instead you'll just be another example of how whatever minority you're part of "can't" do the activity in question. (When in reality, you're just about the same as the average member of the majority...) I think this pressure can drive even very motivated people away from activities that they would really love.
Some examples: a dude who wants to be a tap dancer, a person from a racial minority trying to break into STEM fields, a white teenager trying to rap, an overweight person training to run marathons, the list is endless.
To elaborate on what I mean, I'll take one of the more benign scenarios:
There are countless teenagers that think they can rap. Most of them are terrible. If it's a black teenager that's terrible at rapping, he's just a bad rapper. If it's a white teenager, it's because "white people can't rap."
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:01am PT
|
Great article Matt has posted. If genders were treated equally it would not have been noted in the Alpinist that guys repeated a route of that length/difficulty. Routes that had a first and a first free ascent in the past. First Female Ascent would be an interesting independent topic...
|
|
Daphne
Trad climber
Northern California
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:07am PT
|
Cool, Warbler. To each their own. I will always disagree that women are to blame for initiating the changes you see in climbing.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:12am PT
|
There were plenty of societal taboos I had to break to drop out of school and live in a campground to climb full time, and I was surrounded by like minded climbers, virtually all male.
Why do women let societal expectations limit them more than men in this regard
The societal expectations that you're bucking were very different. Yes, you had to break a societal taboo to drop out of school to live and climb, but the idea of a man who ran free and wild was definitely glorified. Parents and school advisors would prefer a different path--but society valued this poetic idea of rebellious men. Rebellious, independent women? No one glorified that.
Making a big deal out of first female ascents is sexist, and assumes that they are less able by gender than men. Yeah, I actually kinda agree with this...at the very beginning of female inclusion in a sport I think it makes sense to celebrate female participation, but now it seems more patronizing than anything.
I think noting second ascents (as in, second ever, not second by a gender) is kinda neat though, as it brings attention to a cool area and makes me think about how many awesome obscurities are out there, waiting to be climbed again.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:12am PT
|
I didn't have much time this morning, and my internet was inaccessible to me due to a newly added member of our cat herd... but...
of the 1300 names for Yosemite Valley FA teams:
1072 are guy names
111 are gal names
114 are ambiguous (I didn't have time or the means to resolve them)
that is a breakdown of 82% guys, 9% gals and 9% unidentified
assuming the ambiguous names are in the same proportion, we could say that 91% of the FA personnel are guys and 9% are gals...
that's over the entire history of Yosemite Valley climbs.
It will be possible to see how that has changed with year of FA, but perhaps that would be tonight...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:36am PT
|
I actually think reporting first female ascents of sport routes is important. Due to differences in biology and body, competitively, it's a different sport. Ah, yeah, good point. I guess this gets back to the "sport" vs "adventure" distinction, though. Certainly when talking about pure sport/athleticism this makes sense.
Do we care who makes our stairs?
.....
I NEEDZ TO KNOW!!!! Did a man design this staircase!?!? ALL MEN BAD
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/06/29/watch-everybody-trips-on-this-one-subway-stair/
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 11:54am PT
|
All .5 inch of it!
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 12:28pm PT
|
First Female Ascent would be an interesting independent topic...
+1 Also, thanks for taking the time to put together the stats Ed!
I found a solution to the LowT problem, more women climbers:
The authors report a field experiment with skateboarders that demonstrates that physical risk taking by young men increases in the presence of an attractive female. This increased risk taking leads to more successes but also more crash landings in front of a female observer. Mediational analyses suggest that this increase in risk taking is caused in part by elevated testosterone levels of men who performed in front of the attractive female.
http://spp.sagepub.com/content/1/1/57.abstract
Elevated T in the presence of women, lower T in the presence of guys. So maybe more women climbers will make the sport less tame ;P
@Daphne-This thread is like a black hole, once you go past the event horizon there's no escaping.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 01:38pm PT
|
Hung like a button on a fur coat
|
|
Mike Friedrichs
Sport climber
City of Salt
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 01:49pm PT
|
I suppose when we start having fundraisers for aging female climbers who dedicated their lives to climbing and didn't bother having insurance or putting any money in the bank, then we will have achieved equality.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 03:23pm PT
|
it's a graph so it must be true.
we excluded warren harding from analysis.
|
|
LuckyPink
climber
the last bivy
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 04:25pm PT
|
Nita sent me an email to let me know there was high entertainment value on this thread. so I read most of it.
since its more than obvious in every sport there is .. auto racing, bull fighting and rock climbing... not to mention surfing, bmx, motocross, skiing, running, wingsuit flying etc.. that women are just as accomplished and adventurous as men, (see Ed's statistical breakdown above)...there's no apparent reason to post anything.. BUT hahaha.. I do see that Warbler mistook the increase in the number of female climbers as a dumbing down of climbing in general, when it merely reflects the response to marketing the "climbing identity and experience" that all the merchandisers conjure.
Women make money and are great targets along with men for the capturing of those dollars. All corporations try to sell an identity and/or an experience, so you have your mags, gyms, clothing lines, celebrity climbers, films, social clubs/events etc.. women bought in just like men.
so don't take it hard.. climbing is intact, as it has been since 1799 when Ms Parminter climbed in the Alps..(forgive me, Warbler, if your memory predates that)
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:01pm PT
|
This thread has sparked some interest to do more thinking regarding own motivations for FAs. Interesting stuff. Turned out that I started a thread here in Feb of 2012 (http://www.supertopo.com/climbers-forum/1753585/Castle-Domes-Kings-Canon-info);. Back than I was almost a solid 5.9 leader, on cracks. Had no friends or acquaintances that did that sort of thing yet. But that's what I wanted to do, even with the limited skills that I had.
But that's not all. Turned out PRIOR to joining a climbing gym, before I did ANY SORT of rock climbing, but after I got into hiking and general mountaineering in the January of 2010, I started a thread on summitpost.org asking if there were unclimbed peaks in CA (March 2010 - about 10 days after I summited my first peak in the Sierra, Mt. Whitney).
Here it is:
http://www.summitpost.org/phpBB3/unclimbed-ca-peaks-t52403.html
Nooooobbbb HAHA. My screen name was dynamokiev9899. The user has been deleted, so the original post is not visible. But you could see some of my posts quoted in the thread. I guess what attracted me to climbing in general is the opportunity to figure sh#t out on my own and explore places. Exploring classic routes is interesting, but there is something special about the ability to go to a place and not know what to expect. Bust ass, try hard, not know the outcome, possibly be the first human to see some aspects of the range from different view points. There are many reasons I like this sort of thing. If it was about ego and pride, I would make sure to write multiple submissions into all sort of climbing magazines. I never do. Even though majority of ST members are much older than me, I post the content on this site because it seems I share a lot of the same values with the generation that was into this sort of climbing. Even though there are other factors that influence me and we don't see everything in the same light...
|
|
nita
Social climber
chica de chico, I don't claim to be a daisy.
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:12pm PT
|
*
Kevin, I don't want to argue with you.. you are doing a good enough job of digging your own hole .. (-;
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:16pm PT
|
I'm still at work...
I was trying to establish the fraction of all FA people who were guys and gals, given that this is a well defined group of people. That roughly 10% of all those people who have done FA's are gals is a pretty high number, higher than I thought it would be. Go gals!
The large majority of the people on that list have done one or two FAs. I think Breedlove looked at this, I have the most recent compilation and can make a table (or a plot)... but what is the point? More routes = more hardass? Maybe...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:27pm PT
|
This thread has sparked some interest to do more thinking regarding own motivations for FAs. Interesting stuff. This thread has made me want to go out by myself and fourth-class it up amongst the flowers and marmots.
Nooooobbbb HAHA. But since we're laughing at our newb-selves for their earnest excitement, I just went back and found the embarrassingly sincere introductory "Hi I don't know you but can you teach me to mountain?" emails I sent to V last year (last year! I'm still a newb, guys.) after I saw him give a talk.
SO EARNEST, why this woman climbs:
I want to give you a well-thought-out answer about what my goals are, so I spent an absurd amount of time trying to flesh out what exactly it is that I want from the mountains--my apologies if I ramble too excessively! I don't have a list of classic routes that I want to climb or a set of mountains I've been eyeing (though I am sure that I will start to accrue such a list eventually). I think the fundamental motivation behind my interest in these outdoorsy pursuits is the desire to explore the environment I'm in as fully as possible. I've always been eager to explore, but until last year I lived in north and central Texas. Almost every weekend was filled with a low-key adventure; I loved camping and hiking and exploring the huge range of terrain that exists across Texas. I never encountered any climbers (though now that I've left Texas, I've become aware that there is fun climbing there!) and didn't even realize it was a "thing." Then I moved to California, and suddenly my environment was filled with places that were impossible to explore without a lot of technical knowledge. The features of the west are just so magnificent, and I want to learn whatever it is I need to be able to fully immerse myself in the Californian wild.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 05:27pm PT
|
B-I-N-G-O. Nice thing is it should be re-useable from thread to thread.
Imagi-spray: To spray on a trip that is being planned and has not yet taken place. May also be applied to sarcastic posts on trips that do not exist outside the poster's head.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 06:45pm PT
|
Ed, hope you don't get busy with this sh#t instead of tonight's vinyasa at the gym!
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 06:55pm PT
|
actually I had to work late, compounded with a left shoulder that needs a break this week...
fuzzy math?
from the positively identified:
1072 guys
112 gals
1184 guys & gals (had to get that one in)
90.5% guys
9.5% gals
116 unidentified
105 = 118 * 0.905 estimated guys in unid'd list
11 = 116 * 0.095 estimated gals in unid'd list
1072+105 = 1177 estimated guys total
112+11 = 123 estimated gals total
90.5% estimated guys (called it 91%)
9.5% estimated gals (called it 9%)
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 07:46pm PT
|
how about mentions?
guys are mentioned 5744 times
gals 255
unid'd 199
so of the id'd: guys are 96% of the mentioned and gals 4%
This isn't routes because there are multiple people on an FA and they all get mentioned...
the total number of routes in this list is 3118 which includes routes that we know exist but have no associated information...
Just as an aside, for gals the top three are Sue McDevitt, Lynnea Anderson and Linda Jarit.
Sue would be in the top 20 for guys and gals combined
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 08:42pm PT
|
After many years warblering the Warbler comes to a conclusion .......
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 26, 2015 - 08:54pm PT
|
Now if we do this every 5-10 years based on the AAC journal, then we might get a better sense of the trends and we could make a graph.
@Jim, you're right, I"m having too much fun. Even though this has been a questionable use of time, my only regret is not including "noob," "yer gonna die," and some reference Wbraun and/or The Chief in my bingo sheet.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 09:34am PT
|
Too bad you couldn't join last night, Ed. Caitlin and i did yoga. We were surrounded by a bunch of gym climbers and females. Sooo lame. I guess I'll just boulder at PGSF today, maybe there will be other real men there..
|
|
dhayan
climber
los angeles, ca
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 09:40am PT
|
I can't believe I keep reading this thread.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 11:31am PT
|
There are no real men in San Francisco, so how could there be any at the gym? :)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 11:52am PT
|
Gym climbing is like masterbation, it's a perfectly acceptable substitute if you don't have access to something better.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 11:57am PT
|
Viv is a serial masturbator! :)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 12:03pm PT
|
Baseless unproven accusation. I demand 10 peer reviewed articles showing this before you make such claims.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
|
Post deleted so as to not kill the vibe of this incredible thread. What can I say I am giver.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 12:25pm PT
|
Post deleted since overwatch is a giver.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 12:40pm PT
|
story of my life
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 02:02pm PT
|
Gym climbing is like masterbation, it's a perfectly acceptable substitute if you don't have access to something better. Eh, isn't it more like showing a porn in the cinema?
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 02:21pm PT
|
I only gym climb for the yoga pants.
I only gym climb so I could see your pink zebra lycra. When lucky...
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 02:23pm PT
|
My mother, who I'm proud to say I've taught to troll, said in response to this thread:
"Your friends only support your opinion because they like looking at your butt when you climb"
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 03:17pm PT
|
I only gym climb so I could see your pink zebra lycra. When lucky... sweater AND lycra. killin' it.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 03:18pm PT
|
Call her Kitten, she secretly likes it. Be her furry monster.
Dream man, but wtf is that a seahawk hat?!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 04:23pm PT
|
Also, locals in Potrero Chico can't handle pink zebra tights and will freak out. That's the only day I wore them.
rampant sexism, that's what that is. unfair female advantage; they liked my unicorn and kitten tights just fine. keep fighting the good fight for lycra equality, mike!!!!
|
|
Tom
Big Wall climber
San Luis Obispo CA
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 05:45pm PT
|
A climbing gym's relationship to real rock is similar to the relationship between a skatepark to an empty swimming pool. Rock and pools have a visceral, very real and honest character that is missing from their contrived, manufactured counterparts. The best skateparks are the ones that actually have real-deal swimming pools - kinda rare. I don't know if there is such thing as a best climbing gym. All the ones I've seen (never climbed in one) seemed kinda dorky. The one is San Luis Obispo is about three driving miles from an absolutely great crag, right in the middle of town.
Similarly, I live right on the coast, and there is a wooden boardwalk right at the edge of the coastal bluffs, a few yards from the surf. But, I see people three miles away, inside a smelly gym, walking on treadmills. WTF????
Maybe gyms are for people who get poison oak, and are terrified when small, burrowing mammals challenge them for a snack.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 06:04pm PT
|
Eh, isn't it more like showing a porn in the cinema?
Unless you're just sitting watching people boulder in the gym, I think what you're describing would be more like going to see Reel Rock or the Banff film fest...mountain porn... sounds like a fetish.
Single pitch is a quickie.
FAs/FFAs are BDSM.
Not sure about sport climbing and multipitch trad though.
P.S. Going back to an earlier comment in thread...this is a good sample of what a conversation between two women climbers can be.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 06:28pm PT
|
The gym = using tinder in the bay
Sh#t crag = using tinder in bishop
|
|
rbord
Boulder climber
atlanta
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 08:21pm PT
|
Like posting to a thread compared to a real human interaction. Oh the humanity! :-)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 09:17pm PT
|
fivethirty, if this is true:
I'm not sure I buy the analogies.
Then why does this sound so similar to my original analogy for gym climbing:
I'd much rather climb in Yosemite every day than the gym, but that's not an option for me... [Gym Climbing is] a fun end in and of itself.
If the rock is your partner, then there are many types of rock. Some of them you may want to avoid. Some people like to climb on many different kinds of rock, but others specialize in just one. You might get bored with a rock that seemed ok at the beginning (it was the closest thing and you hadn't touched real rock in awhile...aka Castle Rock for you...but eventually you went back to gym climbing/masturbation because it's better than disappointment). There are even individuals that like choss because they think this adds to the spiciness.
When I was interacting with humans at a climbing gym (I think this is called the socializing that has ruined climbing as a discipline) some more came to me:
Bouldering is really intense, but only lasts 2-5 minutes.
Multipitch trad is hours on end.
Alpine climbing is all night long with your soulmate.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 10:05pm PT
|
Now if we do this every 5-10 years based on the AAC journal, then we might get a better sense of the trends and we could make a graph.
actually, you don't have to wait for that... from my list here is the trend for guys and gals...
If you look at the Yosemite FAs by decade, for guys and gals separately, you see that most of the gal FAs have happened recently...
the guys peaked out in the 1980s... as did the gals but the gals are doing better lately then the guys...
in terms of the total fraction of FA mentions per decade, the gals are increasing
if you project that into the future it's quite possible that gals will make up 20-30% of the FA mentions in a decade or so
the times are changing
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 10:46pm PT
|
life is short, but dancing with the devil up there is on the list of things to do... hopefully this year...
when I went up for a recon I was recovering from injuries, but now I'm climbing strong so no excuses...
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 10:48pm PT
|
no no no
the gals haven't put up as many routes, but the fraction of FA's they have participated on (just the gals) is higher in the recent past decades
I separated the guys and the gals to get an idea of the trends...
the gal's still have a ways to go to catch up
|
|
ecflau
Gym climber
CA
|
|
Aug 27, 2015 - 11:03pm PT
|
Sh#t I really wanted the half millennium post but I was out gym climbing.
Sucks. Keep going though , maybe I can get the millennium post instead
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 08:18am PT
|
Thanks for taking the time to put this together Ed. As a thought experiment (I’m not suggesting someone actually do this), I wonder if different areas have different ratios. It’s definitely true for other fields. Case and point: CA, 26% of the state legislators are women, but in CO it’s around 42%. For other fields people also think there’s a tipping point where having a certain percentage of women increases the likelihood of more women doing a thing. Also, it’d be handy to know the spread on how it long it takes for someone who has the FA/FFA personality to develop the skills to put up new route. Those to things would influence the rate of the increase, so it might end up being non-linear.
Kevin, based on your reaction to Ed’s data, does this mean we have another thing we could agree on?
I think that in 10, 20 years you will see more women outside and more women putting up FAs/FFAs. People like Lynn Hill, Ines Papert, and Hazel Findlay aren't anomalies any more than any other climber who pushes at that level. They are a sign of what's possible and what's coming
Who knows what the ratio is going to be in 5, 10, 15, 20, 50 years, or what innate biology has to do with it. I think if you don't know what is innate biology versus environment, assume environment in terms of how you act, then try to be positive force in the environments you’re part of creating. #metaobviousgeneralization
To quote (more or less) one of Chris Kalous’s lady’s nights at the enormocast:
“Just be yourself, don’t be a jerk. Unless you're a jerk, then don’t be yourself.”
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 09:24am PT
|
the data backs me up on my challenge to Cat's opinion that women are more adventurous than men in climbing You are trying to prove wrong an opinion that I do not hold, nor have I stated to hold... I don't think women are more adventurous than men. I think women are entirely capable of being every bit as adventurous as men, and woman-ness is not synonymous with "lack of adventure."
BOf course, Viv, more women climbing means more women doing FAs. I've stated numerous times in this thread that that's a logical progression. Does this not indicate that women are capable of the same adventurousness as men? We are not trying to prove that women have historically been more adventurous, or that the average woman is exactly like the average man. We're just trying to say that being a woman does not mean one is incapable of adventurousness. What in the world is there still left to disagree about??
Perhaps this is non-obvious. A broad statement such as "women are not adventurous" will be interpreted by most readers as "women are inherently incapable of being adventurous." Whatever the intent, the way it reads lumps all women as one homogeneous (inferior!) group. If more nuance is intended, as I hope it was, that sort of phrasing occludes it.
Then a male should do the same study. Add Male Author Gate!!!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/05/01/sexist-peer-review_n_7190656.html
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 09:40am PT
|
just to make a point, once the participation is 50-50 we've gotten to that equilibrium point... and being at 87-13 is a bit more than 20% there...
one can delve into the fine points, but the willingness to participate on an FA is already a major commitment to adventure, and to that part of climbing not describable as a "sport".
|
|
wstmrnclmr
Trad climber
Bolinas, CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 10:04am PT
|
This has been a great thread to read. Somehow it didn't get destroyed by the end of the first page and still interesting after said page where so many repeat endlessly. Warbler, your use and context of the word 'primal' struck a chord. I would tend to go more with 'cultural' or 'social' as to causation of where climbings been and is going.
I would still tend more towards the argument that climbing, like much of everything we do as a 'tribe', is a direct reflection of the times. I would say that women's and men's roles were quite different in the 70's and continue to evolve as they may. And so it is with climbing. Cat's generation and yours Warbler are very different from what I can see and Cat's generation and those of other women's as well and comments about gyms reflect this. Most on here are of an older generation and see gyms much differently then today's generation. I consider myself to be an adventure climber in the mold of the 70's but I hope that I am open and non-judgemental enough to see the benefits of all the different forms of the game we play. And as far as gyms go, at least they are getting more people in the game and exponentially more coming to all forms of climbing from that.
Gyms and especially bouldering bring more and more women to the game and is that a bad thing? One of my best and favorite partners is a young women (Cat, you'd love to meet her and if your around camp four, go to the SAR site and ask for Josie. Tell her Tony sent you)who is a bad-ass first class. Switching leads on some of the most adventurous climbs (she told me the other day that other women have told her she should "work projects" because it would make her stronger. She told me that she would rather on-site to her abilities because there is more "adventure") I've been on. She has more sack then most men she climbs with and she's done FA's you'll never hear of miles from the nearest hospital. When you hand her the rope to climb some unknown horror onsite, she doesn't hesitate. And there are more and more like her out there. But this place doesn't represent that age group (so it's good to see some-one like cat going toe to toe with the previous generation). And Josie worked at the gym when she started out.
So, although I think men and women are wired differently, I think they can (and do) meet on common ground. And I think gyms, bouldering etc. reflect societal and cultural changes bringing about equality, at least in the climbing realm.
Edit: When climbing with Josie, I don't think of it as a novelty nor that she's a woman. Simply that she's more than an equal who's up for the adventure.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 10:05am PT
|
It's SuperTopo, land of trolls, where it seems accepted to respond to an entirely outlandish statement that no one could possibly believe with another outlandish one :)
Should we move on to the part about how gyms and the resulting increase in female participation have all but tamed the wild beast that climbing once was? I think we solved this one with the adorable catchphrase "Bolts not boobs!!"
|
|
wstmrnclmr
Trad climber
Bolinas, CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:18am PT
|
"Cat and Viv readily admit that women do less FAs than men, but contend that societal issues affect this number far more than how genetically predisposed to adventure women are." Spot on.
I would dare say that if Cat ( I don't know Viv's age?) were arguing amongst her generation about adventure that gender would be far less of an issue and societal much more the discussion but you chose to argue with the generation before on a site dominated by that generation. There are hardly any FA's being put up in the style of Worral et. al. back in the day being put up today by man or woman and, as a matter of fact, there were very few back in the day (men) who had the sack to repeat those routes back then. In Kevin you are debating amongst one of the few. What would be more interesting is to know how many (a much smaller climbing pop.) climbing men repeated "space babble" back in the day when "men were men" amongst the given population of climbers then. I think climbing may be less adventurous in general, do to societal issues, not gender issues.
Edit: To Kevin's argument: Show me exceptionally adventurous men from this generation! Single examples likewise don't apply. I would contend that in your style of climbing back in the day that you were an exception. But that was then......
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:19am PT
|
(1) If we do accept FAs as a measure of adventurousness:
Female climbers do fewer FAs, but the number is on the rise. This indicates that adventurousness is NOT strictly a function of gender. Women haven't switched gender since 1980. With FAs as our metric, we'd conclude that there has been increase in female adventurousness, which seems to be at least correlated with a societal increase in female independence/equality.
(2) If we do not accept FAs as a measure of adventurousness:
No points are proven by looking at FA numbers, and saying women are less adventurous still has no data to back it up.
I would dare say that if Cat ( I don't know Viv's age?) were arguing amongst her generation about adventure that gender would be far less of an issue and societal much more the discussion wstmrnclmr,
Indeed! My generation (Viv is in the same age bracket) does talk about adventure, and gender isn't even considered as a determining factor. Amongst the 20s-30s crowd, we have plenty of discussions about on-sighting heady routes v. projecting sport routes v. soloing easy routes in the mountains, and what we're talking about is personal motivation, risk management, society's definition of "adventure," etc.
Occasionally gender comes up in conversation (perhaps when we see someone dragging a frightened significant other up a climb?), but even that discussion usually trends more toward, "Why are climbers so obsessed with their hobby that they can't understand when their significant other doesn't want to live and breathe it too?"
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:34am PT
|
If it's not true, prove me wrong. Are you under the impression that this statement carries some power? As an argumentative strategy it's laughable.
So sure, maybe by the second definition women are less adventurous than men. But then you haven't really said anything about women. You've mostly said something about how men treat them. Yesssss perfect.
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:37am PT
|
Regarding the ongoing discussion here about the percentage of climbers who are women I heard some interesting stats yesterday.
The Ouray Ice Park keeps track of participants and they do it by gender. 46% of all climbers in the Ice Park last season were women.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:41am PT
|
This is like having sex in the same position with the same person for eternity.
Not that I know what that's like...
Ha!
While the rest of us experiment with our words, clarify definitions, flesh out ideas and adjust our opinions, and learn a lot about each other in the process...
you keep repeating the same phrase like a broken record, and no matter WHAT feedback you get, you keep doing the same thing.
By your analogy, everyone in this thread is a way more adventurous and considerate lover than you.
|
|
wstmrnclmr
Trad climber
Bolinas, CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:52am PT
|
Burch took the paraphrased words right out of my mouth (good job lad). Gender has been the at forefront but what of adventure and how to define? Talk about a thread killer! The dabate has been endless. How did Ed measure or decide what climbs are 'adventure' climbs? And then how to apply the discussion? Go there and you've got a true mess on your hands......
|
|
donini
Trad climber
Ouray, Colorado
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:57am PT
|
"Adventure only begins when things start going wrong".......Yvon Chouinard. Given that definition it would seem that men have more adventure....they're certainly better than women at screwing things up.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:57am PT
|
Burch is saying you are right by definition 2, which means.....next to nothing.
mike defined the distinction well:
I think there's a lot of talking past each other with regards to what we mean by "adventurousness" in this thread. I see two definitions:
Def. 1: Adventurousness as synonymous with "innate adventurousness". By this definition, when one says "women are less adventurousness than men" one really means "women are genetically wired as less adventurous than men".
Def. 2: Adventurousness simply meaning "willing to go on adventures".
It's completely possible that women, on average, could be less "willing to go on adventures" without being "genetically wired as less adventurous than men" due to societal influence, gender roles, etc.
So sure, maybe by the second definition women are less adventurous than men. But then you haven't really said anything about women. You've mostly said something about how men treat them.
The first definition is really hard to say anything about. FA count is nowhere sufficient data.
"Adventure only begins when things start going wrong".....,,Yvon Chouinard. Given that definition it would seem that men have more adventure....they're certainly better than women at screwing things up. Hahaha
Does this thread count as an adventure? It's a total mess :)
This argument is amazing. Even if one could say something that definitively proved Kevin wrong, he could find a way to invert logic and still insist it proved his point.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:12pm PT
|
Regarding the ongoing discussion here about the percentage of climbers who are women I heard some interesting stats yesterday.
The Ouray Ice Park keeps track of participants and they do it by gender. 46% of all climbers in the Ice Park last season were women.
Ouray Ice Park is an outdoor ice climbing gym. BUT that means there will be a better selection of ice climbing chicks that are competent enough to follow.
NAYCE!
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:13pm PT
|
BURCHEY, VOICE OF REASON?!
Never thought I'd say that ;)
BUT that means there will be a better selection of ice climbing chicks that are competent enough to follow. But they'll probably all just cry when they try to follow you, and all those salty tears will f up the ice. Keep them OUT.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:16pm PT
|
Ah, the subtleties of the d-bag hierarchy! It's a thing my feeble female mind can't quite comprehend.
|
|
crankster
Trad climber
No. Tahoe
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:19pm PT
|
I was visiting my daughter in Sac last night and stopped into the Pipeworks. Crowded as hell on a hot night, a lot of the focus on Alex Honnold quietly doing laps. Great way to stay in shape for outdoor adventures.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
|
There are more male nurses now than in 1970s. Totally proves that the modern day males are sissies and are way less adventurous than women. This is the proof that we needed to support the "Modern women are more adventurous" quote, for which I am responsible. WINNING!
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:20pm PT
|
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 12:28pm PT
|
I am still half-wondering if Kevin believes none of what he's said, and I'm just too earnest a person to understand that he is the most dedicated troll of all time.
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 01:05pm PT
|
Interesting to think about males and females as far as both the nature vs nurture. I believe both factors play a major role. While social gender roles and their influence on risk taking in both genders could be well understood, I think the nature role is a lot more intriguing.
It is a fact that females on average live longer than males. It is likely favorable for a female to live longer and produce more offsprings, from evolutionary point of view. It is not as important for a male to live longer because it does not take that long for conception. So I would thing evolutionary the hormonal differences of sexes would also play a role on risk taking. I am sure the nature did not design us this way because it knew it would matter how well we would deal with some stupid runout. First world entertainment.
This battle of wits with unarmed opponents is getting boring.
You guys should bang instead.. :)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 01:08pm PT
|
TO THE LADY LURKERS: I know you are out there. I was one of you recently. Come and play—the water is nice and it’s fun (if pointless) to splash around.
@ Cat T, speaking of equality, ladies is trolls too, go and brush your shoulders off
Lol, Kev. Cue overly earnest and lengthy post to feed your inner troll.
I think if you scroll back to where I made the original statement hundreds of posts ago about the fact there would be more women doing FFAs/FAs you will see that your response then was very different. You apologized for what you said, and I’m not going to throw your words in your face. Having said that though, in return, please don’t put words in my mouth that I never said.
I’m never going to impress you with my climbing resume (probably a perma-noob), but I don’t think being able to do a one-armed pull-up off my pinky is a requirement to have a valid opinion. As one of my co-workers likes to say, opinions are like a$$holes, everyone has one.
The women who would impress you aren’t even on this thread because they are out sending, which, I think we can also agree, neither of us is doing at the moment since there is good evidence we have been at computers, not climbing.
Last fall, I got to spend close to a month in the Sierra. I’m going talk about my woman feelz, not what the hell I was doing. There were times I was scared and pushed myself to my physical limit, and there were also days I spent half my time looking at wildflowers and skinny dipping. Through all of it though, I felt wild and untamed—free. Being in the mountains feels true.
I used to volunteer to bring people outside, and occasionally set up top-ropes for co-workers. There is something special about seeing someone backpack or climb outdoors for the first time (I guess this would be cherry poppin’ if I keep with the inappropriate analogies). People are capable of so much more than they realize. I’m always going to assume that a person, regardless of gender or background, is capable and has that wildness in them waiting. Even if they tell me they like lattes.
At least I got you to agree in a non-trolly moment that women will continue to trend upwards FAs/FFAs. I consider that progress.
Whelp, there goes my lunch break.
To put it in climbing terms, he's pumped and just grabbed a green camalot when he should have grabbed purple.
+1 Just grab the god-damn purple cam. You might as well put the green cam up your butt for the amount of good it is doing you right now.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 01:29pm PT
|
No way Kev, my mother warned me about stranger danger. We still don't know what the fuq you were doing in your garage the other night. Troll you later.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 04:35pm PT
|
Now this thread is getting somewhere.
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 04:44pm PT
|
Flaccid at a 0
Run-off-at-the-Lippia, please refrain from posting your medical test results here. Pics with your troll-like stature, disturbingly wide head, and varicose vein laden lower legs were bad enough (the muscle shirt was particularly nausea inducing).
A lot of fukin strawmen being built and burned in this thread. Well done on that count Crusher, is that gluten-free fair-trade, shade grown, organically sourced SNAG straw you spun them from?
And Jeebs, I thought you were off the booze? Your prior mutterings were far from clear, closer to what I hear from the schitzo case on the city bus. Expecting someone to decipher that gibberish is a bridge too far.
Kevin asserted that women are less adventurous in climbing, and the rise of gyms bringing a rise of women has made the climbing community in general less adventurous. Now you may argue that his metric - first ascents, isn't the right measure of adventurous...but you sad sack man-purse swinging clowns aren't doing that. You may argue whether the root cause is biological or societal, but you haven't hiked up your man-pris, put down your chamomile tea and done that either.
Instead you are off on some Prince Valiant wannabe routine of embracing your inner moon goddess and pretending everyone is equal, flinging accusations with no evidence, or building monumental strawmen (or strawwomen as the case may be).
So maybe ya'll should just toddle back to your drum circle, and hope that Lillith Hairylegs over there will swoon at your sensitive nature. And take those fukin Luna bars with you.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 04:46pm PT
|
Hahaha good troll Kevin :-)
LOL that cheapus bonehead is way way too stupid serious.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:02pm PT
|
Now you may argue that his metric - first ascents, isn't the right measure of adventurous...but you sad sack man-purse swinging clowns aren't doing that. You may argue whether the root cause is biological or societal, but you haven't hiked up your man-pris, put down your chamomile tea and done that either.
Read again: I think the chamomile tea wasn't just set down gently, it was aggressively tossed.
Those were exactly the things discussed, while Kevin did this:
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:12pm PT
|
Holy crap, leadumper that was great.
|
|
rbord
Boulder climber
atlanta
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:18pm PT
|
Lol! We used to have slavery but now we have man-purse swinging clowns. Oh well, I guess our 50 years of personal observations will have to substitute for intelligence :-)
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:36pm PT
|
Damn good bump of this thread (by me) before it died! WINNING! Again. Now I have sh#t to do on the way to climbing. See some incredibly entertaining posts already. By the time I return, this thread may either get deleted or grow into 1000s of posts, so please, save it for me someone!
Through all of it though, I felt wild and untamed—free. Being in the mountains feels true.
YES! THIS!!!
For a 'perma-noob' you know too well that the only thing that is real, is the PERSONAL experience that YOU get when you are running around the hills, cragging or whatever the f### you want to do out there. The climbing community, this forum, your best friends etc don't have any effect unless they are there. At times i enjoy the community, but honestly I am more of an antisocial animal that likes the feeling of exposure and solitude. To a degree. And its easy to find that, even now. Unless you want to have the nutcracker to yourself on the weekend. Blaming women for lame climbing is like blaming them for lame sex when your junk doesn't point upwards. Things change, mountains will stay the same...aside from that whole glacier melting thing and rock fall, but that's not the point...sky is the limit.
|
|
Ed Hartouni
Trad climber
Livermore, CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:53pm PT
|
And take those fukin Luna bars with you.
ooops, I eat Lara bars... didn't know it mattered what bars you ate... it's all about the calories, right?
|
|
rbord
Boulder climber
atlanta
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 05:54pm PT
|
This battle of wits with unarmed opponents is getting boring. The relentless attacks, ad hominem and otherwise ... show(s) that my opinion carries weight
Sure if we've been believing it for 50 years why stop now? Thanks for the fun :-)
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
Sacramento
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 06:44pm PT
|
http://www.arleneblum.com/t_shirts.html
Could you wear this t-shirt?
Cheers to all of you. I'm going to the mountains.
If this thread hasn't died by the time I get back, then I hope that there are more pics of women throwing down and men's calves. It's probably unlikely, but I can keep dreamin'...
Edit: post modified because it violated the principles of KISS.
|
|
Elcapinyoazz
Social climber
Joshua Tree
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 06:47pm PT
|
Here's a no sh#t story of an adventurous girl climber.
This young lady that I coach, a tweener at this point, goes up on a well-known SoCal 5.11 highball slab. A lot of people put a toprope on this thing, but she isn't messing with any rope bs, she's going to boulder it. And the second crux is the very last move, looking at about a 20' airball to the deck. That last move,for her height, is an all out slap/huck for the top.
So she sails through the tech crux at the bottom, walks the rest, and is staring at the last move. She tries a bunch of things hoping to find a way to make the move statically and can't, is getting pumped, and starts to downclimb. And she pitches, a spectacular windmilling, screaming, 15' ripper to the pads.
Now that would have been enough for most people for the day, and I have to admit on my onsight burn I climbed to the last move, wasn't 100% sure, and downclimbed back to the ground before going back up and sending it.
She walks around a few minutes to gather herself and announces "That was reaaaallly scary, but I'm going back up there!". And went back up, got to the last move, no hesitation, no second thoughts, full commitment huck for the top. Of course she stuck it, and it was one of the proudest things I saw that year.
But one little lady with a whole lotta go-for-it doesn't change the fact that Burchy and his modern day murse toting ilk are wearing their Hermes and Yves St Laurent neckerchiefs while toproping 15' 5.9 pebbles that we bouldered in tennis shoes in the 80s, and preening between burns so their creative facial hair will look just-so in the endless selfies. #Hardcore #they're-manpris-not-poofterpants, #shreddintha5.7gnarBrah
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 08:11pm PT
|
Of course she stuck it, and it was one of the proudest things I saw that year.
Maybe one day I can make you a Chai latte and take you climbing, so you could see what the word proud really means. When you see the rope going up a 100ft to the next anchor without a single piece of pro clipped in, maybe you will get a hint. But till than keep those stories to yourself so I don't choke on my beer - the chaser.
The Man
|
|
drljefe
climber
El Presidio San Augustin del Tucson
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 10:06pm PT
|
I hike Woodson hill with the lady for exercise with my pack on, full of ropes, and boulder the 5.9s in tennies along the way.
And with T to burn, I'm sure.
You've come a long way Burch.
Keep reaching for the stars.
|
|
limpingcrab
Trad climber
the middle of CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:00pm PT
|
Awesome! Vitaliy said this thread was entertaining and I hadn't followed it until now. Too much to read it all but what I've scanned has helped me pass a few minutes.
It's funny when people talk about men compared to women and get all angry. Ability and tendencies towards nurturing, risk, "adventure" or whatever are biological/genetic and there's nothing wrong with that. Study human evolution and imagine how well groups would have survived and reproduced if the only ones able to create and feed infants were also the ones out hunting food and fighting off competing groups. Male and female bodies and brains are physiologically and functionally different. No need to get all emotional about it or assume that's a bad thing.
|
|
limpingcrab
Trad climber
the middle of CA
|
|
Aug 28, 2015 - 11:43pm PT
|
^^^^ Fair enough.
But I was talking to both men and women, to assume otherwise make you totally sexist! Such a pig, jeez :)
|
|
quartzmonzonite
climber
|
|
Aug 29, 2015 - 12:04pm PT
|
Yeah men do 99% of fas, but the second a women goes out to do it they free something badass like the nose. I think women are more built for climbing than men, very light, small fingers more flexible. Men for the most part feel obligated to prove their physical strength and thats why you see more men athletes. Saw Daniel woods climb a vert crimp line less than smooth and then this chick came up and did it effortlessly.
|
|
rbord
Boulder climber
atlanta
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 01:21pm PT
|
Oh well if the wife of a cultural anthropologist thinks so then that must say something, I guess. Let's just say that it confirms what we already believe, if that's what we like to say.
Mostly I think that is what we like to say. With our massive intelligence, we convince ourselves that we've been spending 50 years doing double blind research in a gender neutral cultural environment, while really we've been convincing ourselves that what we believe is really true, really! How else could we convince ourselves to believe our advantagous beliefs (praise Jesus!) in order to create and perpetuate the (kind of, locally) advantageous cultural gender dimorphism that we create? Sure there's probably some intelligence in being able to convince ourselves to believe that, just maybe not the kind of intelligence that we think it is.
But you know, some of us are working on other advantageous beliefs. Go figure ... We like to do research on the relative intelligence of blacks vs whites too :-) We don't mind if, in your manliness, you need to call us names.
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 01:27pm PT
|
I love this place, a lot of good writers and smart people. Nice post
|
|
DanaB
climber
CT
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 02:26pm PT
|
A bit peripheral to the discussion - but why should I be different?
Someone is interviewing world class competitive Scrabble players. The topic is:
Why, if there are so many women involved in the game at a competitive level, have there been only 1 (?2) women who have won major events?
Best answer, from a world-ranked male competitor: "Probably because the women have lives outside of this sh#t."
|
|
DanaB
climber
CT
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 03:22pm PT
|
Male
44 years climbing - still at it, not just talking.
About a dozen FAs, all very minor, one as a solo.
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 03:38pm PT
|
Warbler said -- "I know some pretty dim witted men ..."
Damn it, I knew it .... he's talkin about me again ..... lol
|
|
DanaB
climber
CT
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 04:11pm PT
|
Your comment shows that women are in fact different than men, or certainly implies it from one second hand hearsay anecdote with no link to back it up.
The anecdote is from the book Word Freak.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 05:16pm PT
|
Born to and raised by a guy who was stoked that his second kid was on the way and didn't care if I was a boy or a girl and he made damned sure I was given enough rope with which to hang myself.
I never gave a second's thought to whether or not girls were allowed to be adventurous; I just was. Granted, I ran with the Big Dogs way more than I played with the little girls
Hey eKat:
Do you think those two things are related? The way you were raised, and the way you turned out?
I had similar parents, and it never occurred to me that I wasn't supposed to just keep up with the boys; I thought "wimpy" women should just HTFU. As an adult I met many women whose parents and communities were very overtly biased, though, and I started to think that perhaps I was extremely lucky, and that the expectation put on me--that girls were supposed to be strong and good at math--was out of the ordinary.
|
|
DanaB
climber
CT
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 05:43pm PT
|
No, no offense taken at all.
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 06:04pm PT
|
There were just open doors and lots of cheering! This is a beautiful thing to give to your kid!
|
|
SC seagoat
Trad climber
Santa Cruz, Moab or In What Time Zone Am I?
|
|
Aug 30, 2015 - 07:18pm PT
|
Interesting discussion on the male/female thing.
I think a lot has to do with the culture and community in which you grew up.
Growing up in Western Pa in a hunting, fishing, (hunting) gun culture there was little daylight between what girls and boys did. Hunting and Fishing was a family activity primarily a hold over from the necessity of it to put food on the table. By the late 50s it mainly sport for most families with the added benefit of incredible fresh game and fowl to eat. Granted there were more boys than girls bagging kills but moms and daughters were taught field dressing as they would accompany the "hunt". My Dad taught me small game and fowl field dressing when I was 10. Large game (buck) dressing when I was 14. I fished from the time I was six and hunted from 12. My mom would have been there but she died when I was five. There were many girls doing the same. I bagged my first deer when I was 16 with my 30.06 but it was my first and last. Didn't have the heart for it. I still did small game and cleaned and dressed what my dad and brothers got. My fav pic of my Mom and some other female friends in oversize hunting jacket. Now I walk into a Cabelas and the women's camo section (for real gear, not fashion) takes a substantial floor space.
My high school had a robust archery and rifle team composed of about 40% girls. We won many state championships. It was because of rifle club I found out I needed glasses.
Most of what has been talked about here has been recreational activities where the disparity between boys and girls has typically been perceived as greater. Until Title XI in organized male vs female sports we were at a terrible disadvantage. Field Hockey and a strange game of basketball as well as track and field were available to us. Forget competitive swimming...couldn't get pool time because of the boys. So regardless of just go do it Title XI helped a lot.
We used to look at Califofnia as Beach Barbies ala Gidget and Annette. Hollywood versions were the only glimpse we had of California life. We were repelled at the same time fascinated by it. Were girls really that vapid?
So if you were brought up in a culture or community that focused on recreation activities rather than engaging in tough activities as a way of life and necessity I can how the sex difference was perceived. Bravo to those that over came it. After emigrating to Northern Cal in the mid 70s I was so glad to see Gidget was not the norm any more.
Susan
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
a marmot hole
|
|
Aug 31, 2015 - 06:11pm PT
|
She agreed with my assessment that women by nature or genetics were less adventurous than men on the average
Fundamentally, this is the wrong question to discuss. I think it’s more important to think about distribution, not averages.
For sh!ts and giggles let’s pretend that the bell curve is the distribution of “climber spirit” instead of IQ. “Climber spirit” is the ability not only to put up with uncertainty, but to embrace it. It is resilience, being willing to fail and also probably having a high tolerance for pain/discomfort. Maybe it’s other things too (we’re talking about a very specific genre of climbing right now). Let’s now say that:
150 = free solos barefoot up the nose in 2 hrs 10 min before it was cool (shoes are aid)
0 = never leaves the house because they are afraid life might happen and kill them
The people who are doing adventure climbing are the people with 125 and above. This is the group we should be discussing. Rather than worrying about whether the average man or woman is more or less adventurous, it would be more informative to know what the spread is for women versus men.
There may be differences in this spread. Going a step further even if you knew both spreads perfectly (unlikely), then you still are left with wondering how much of that spread is genetics/nature or environment/nurture. I think we can agree that both contribute.
Now go back to seeing the curve as intelligence. Throwing random numbers out, let’s say intelligence is 70% genetics and 30% environment. That’s the difference between someone being normal and very bright, or normal and very dull. (Also for a refresher on the crappy history of IQ tests and eugenics, click here: http://crackingthelearningcode.com/bonus1.html or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_race_and_intelligence_controversy);
There is no doubt that the environment for women has changed. If Arlene Blum had been trying to raise money for the first American expedition to Annapurna these days she would have gotten a sponsor rather than having to sell the “a woman’s place is on top" t-shirts. This is pushing the spread out for women.
Both eKat’s and Cat T’s comments say something about the environments they grew up with—essentially lots of freedom to try, push and fail. My mom still has my boulder shoes from when I was 6, and she would let me wander around unsupervised in Indians Rocks, Berkeley. Same when we hiked in the Sierra.
I think gender isn’t a bad thing to discuss here, because there are more women climbing. This thread would look different if more women participated in it or if a similar topic (muhahahaha) took place in the TGR forum. Climbing probably has and will change in similar ways…but to say women are taming it…meh. Don’t buy it, never will.
Kids might be given less rope to hang themselves these days due to the rise of helicopter parents. Gym climbing is allowing a greater part of the spread to participate, which in turn is somehow changing the spread itself. The ease of being able to find uncertainty is changing due to the amount of information on routes that is available to all of us whether it’s through guidebooks or online trip reports (as was discussed way up thread by Ed, rgould and others).
-permanoob
|
|
overwatch
climber
|
|
Aug 31, 2015 - 06:20pm PT
|
good post ,well written.
it would be pretty sketchy these days to let your 6 year old kid roam around by themselves
Edit:
Duh, your right, I don't know how old you are. When I was a kid you could get away with it.
We ran amok, neighborhood girls included. Sh#t still happened but not with the frequency seen today.
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
a marmot hole
|
|
Aug 31, 2015 - 06:22pm PT
|
Trust me, it was sketchy then too. My parents got a lot of sh!t from people. They just didn't care.
Edit: +1 ekat, that's a better way to put it ^^^^^^^
|
|
SC seagoat
Trad climber
Santa Cruz, Moab or In What Time Zone Am I?
|
|
"There is no force equal to a woman determined to rise." - W.E.B. Du Bois
Susan
|
|
Turok
Trad climber
Colorado
|
|
Hi Kev, Here is an interesting theory that I present somewhat "tongue in cheek" that may be applicable (from the perspective of gender) to a climbers williness toward risks in adventure/trad climbing (relative to gym climbing) and could also explain some of the gender gap previous studies have found in risk-seeking behaviors, emergency department visits and mortality.
Men are more likely than women to be admitted to an emergency department after accidental injuries or with a sport injury, and they are more likely to die in traffic accidents.
Men may be more likely to play riskier sports or have dangerous occupations, but they might also do more stupid things.
Men tend to take more risks than women do, and they also seem to be ahead of women in engaging in risky behavior that is extremely "idiotic," according to researchers who revealed in a new study that the majority of the receivers of a Darwin Award are men.
The researchers reviewed the stories of all nominees for the Darwin Award from 1995 to 2014, noting the gender of the winner.
To win a Darwin Award, the story of how the death happened must be verifiable, and the person must have been capable of sound judgment, while showing "an astonishing misapplication of common sense."
The researchers looked at 332 cases confirmed by the Darwin Awards Committee to be true incidents. There were 318 cases not involving mixed gender couples.
Of those, just 36 were women. The other 282 winners, or 88.7 percent, were men, the researchers found.
The findings support the researchers' theory that most women are more circumspect in their risk assesment than men and "a higher percentage of men than women are idiots, and idiots do stupid things."
Cheers!
KD
|
|
Turok
Trad climber
Colorado
|
|
Hi Kev,
I got such a kick out of your good natured repartee with Cat t. that I just had to add my 2 cents.
By the way, after climbing some real throat dryers with you and others in Eldorado and having climbed with Katherine Freer in the desert and numerous other women in various areas, I will offer this observation that I know you share. There are brilliant and bold climbers of both sexes scattered throughout the unskilled (from a trad climbing perspective) masses, that for reasons unknow to me, now embrace this somewhat perverse discipline called climbing. Regardless, the song remains the same. Ground-up trad climbing is as dangerous as it gets. Gravity is a junk yard dog at dusk, turn your back, make a mistake and it will bite the sh#t out of you. The transition from gym to trad is rife with danger regardless of your gender.
Always great to hear from you my friend!
KD
|
|
Crimpergirl
Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
|
|
Hi Turok! We hope you are well. Where are you these days in CO?
|
|
Turok
Trad climber
Colorado
|
|
Hi Crimpergirl, Maureen and I are raising our family in Hood River Oregon.
We still have our little cottage in Eldorado so I get to climb a couple times a year.
Cheers!
KD
|
|
Crimpergirl
Sport climber
Boulder, Colorado!
|
|
Great to know. Let BrassNuts (Dave Vaughan) and I know when you are in town. Be fun to connect!
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
Viv, why did you put me into the 'Very Dull' category? That's kind of messed up! ;) haha
|
|
cat t.
climber
california
|
|
She put herself in that category too :p
(She signs with the lowercase v. Maybe even duller??)
|
|
WBraun
climber
|
|
LOL ...
Warblers's trollin with a big hook .....
|
|
Vitaliy M.
Mountain climber
San Francisco
|
|
She put herself in that category too :p
No, there is also an "I" category in that clever post of hers.
No women at this campfire!
No women in this Valley with previously unclimbed 600-2000 ft faces!
No woman on this summit!
No women at this lake!
maybe someone can take me sport climbing next weekend!?
|
|
viv.r.e
climber
a marmot hole
|
|
Viv, why did you put me into the 'Very Dull' category? That's kind of messed up! ;) haha
Lol V, why would I do that? Especially now that I hear you're going to downgrade the harding slot to 5.3+ after your last trip. If you're really worried about where you are on the distribution, then you might be able to get in a few more FAs by not taking so many soulful pics of flowers in the soft morning light...
Warblers's trollin with a big hook .....
Big hook involves some skill. Last post I saw was more like throwing dynamite into a fishing pond.
|
|
Messages 1 - 328 of total 328 in this topic |
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|