Wilderness Management Coming to Park Near You

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 1 - 10 of total 10 in this topic
Mungeclimber

Trad climber
Nothing creative to say
Topic Author's Original Post - Apr 15, 2015 - 09:09pm PT
http://www.accessfund.org/site/apps/nlnet/content2.aspx?c=tmL5KhNWLrH&b=5000939&ct=14575569

Last month, two National Park Service (NPS) units—Lake Mead National Recreation Area and Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks—issued Wilderness Management Plans that provide detailed guidelines for managing climbing in designated Wilderness, including fixed anchors, crowding, safety and environmental impact. These are some of the first examples of parks putting the 2013 NPS national-level guidelines for climbing in wilderness into action, and are critically important because they will set a precedent for how other National Parks develop strategies for Wilderness climbing management. The Access Fund has been working with both Parks, advocating for climbers’ interests and a balanced approach to resource management. Overall, the latest plans are generally acceptable, but there is still room for improvement.

The Lake Mead NRA final plan (known to climbers as Christmas Tree Pass) is greatly improved from the draft plan, which originally recommended the wholesale removal of bolted climbing routes. The Access Fund provided NPS planners with detailed, critical comments that prompted them to remove excessive regulations, some of which discriminated against climbers, were poorly substantiated and did not support best climbing practices. This new final plan outlines a process for evaluating bolted routes for environmental and cultural impacts, which includes stakeholders from the NPS, Native American tribes, and the climbing community. This nuance is substantial to the climbing community because it recognizes the need for the NPS to include climbers in decisions about fixed anchor management instead of making a unilateral decision.

The Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks final plan is also much better for the climbing community relative to the draft plan. The draft plan proposed that climbers apply for a $20 special use permit, which could take up to 3 months to acquire, in order to add or replace any fixed anchor—including webbing slings. The Access Fund strongly opposed this proposed regulation on the grounds that it is neither realistic nor safe. Park officials worked with this feedback, and the final plan’s preferred alternative now states that climbers can judiciously place non-permanent fixed anchors (e.g. slings and nuts), when necessary, without the need for permits. Climbers will, however, need special use permits to place, and replace, bolts in wilderness. The Access Fund will continue to remind the NPS that bolt replacement is essential to Wilderness management, and that the NPS should not obstruct climbers from replacing bolts due to safety and visitor experience concerns.

Wilderness climbing management is one of Access Fund’s highest priority policy issues, and we are working with Parks all across the country to advocate for climbers’ interests. The work that happens over the next couple of years will set the stage for the next decade, making this a critical time to define best practices for climbing management on our public lands.Date: 4/10/2015
healyje

Trad climber
Portland, Oregon
Apr 15, 2015 - 10:11pm PT
It totally eludes me how these outlandish ideas get into land managers' heads or that such initiatives could possibly ever see the light of day in the Federal Register...


[ In response I strongly urge you to contact your congressman and demand all computers, email and internet access be immediately removed from all Interior Department agencies and offices in order to stop their employees from spreading all these vicious rumors and damn lies about climbers among each other. ]
limpingcrab

Trad climber
the middle of CA
Apr 15, 2015 - 10:21pm PT
Click on appendix J - climbing management strategy, to see the PDF

http://parkplanning.nps.gov/document.cfm?parkID=342&projectID=33225&documentID=65018

Looks like sport climbing is illegal in SEKI! LOL
New, bolt-intensive climbing routes (i.e., “sport climbs”) are not appropriate in wilderness and are expressly prohibited.
Bad Climber

climber
Apr 16, 2015 - 05:57am PT
Hey, guys and gals:

This is more evidence as to why we should support the Access Fund. I recently re-upped after letting my contribution slide.

Re. some of those "drafts": Heh, like I'd get a permit to leave a sling or a nut while backing off some high peak in a storm! Are these people really such idiots? I guess so.

BAd
clinker

Trad climber
Santa Cruz, California
Apr 16, 2015 - 06:17am PT
Wearing prAna instead of wool knickers may soon lead to profiling.
jonnyrig

climber
Apr 16, 2015 - 08:04am PT
Legislative oversight coming to climbing? Noooo....
Told you so. Only that was in another thread where you actually wanted some oversight applied. Only thing is, over there, the majority don't really seem to care that such legislation tends to be overly restrictive and... well... stupid. Comes around goes around. Get used to it.
Mungeclimber

Trad climber
Nothing creative to say
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 16, 2015 - 09:30am PT
Now will be finding funky colorful sling anchors all over the place in wilderness instead of a camouflaged set of rings.

I suspect we'll lose history too. Anyone that has to leave a bolt anchor behind because they weren't sure (adventure?) about a descent, will now be doing it illegally. Predetermining via permit where anchors should go will be a community after thought and not integral to the process of ascending in any legal sense under those rules.

well, leaving nuts behind as a fixed anchor is feasible in some cases. it's not a sustainable descent mechanism unless we all start carrying and leaving steel carabiners or quick links behind too. The cables will wear out and at some point someone will lean back on a shitty wire, and then we will get to blame the management policy.

I'd prefer to avoid someone's death. But that's just me.


limpingcrab

Trad climber
the middle of CA
Apr 16, 2015 - 09:34am PT
If I'm not mistake, SEKI and possibly Yosemite has had a permit system in the books for years but nobody has ever actually applied for one and nobody has bothered to enforce it.

I think this will continue unless there is a flagrant foul and someone is drilling within sight of a parking lot or popular lookout or something.
JEleazarian

Trad climber
Fresno CA
Apr 16, 2015 - 10:35am PT
The only "permit" system in Yosemite, of which I am aware, was the old "sign out/ sign in" system that disappeared from disuse in the early 1970's. Before doing a climb, we singed out at the ranger station in the Visitor's Center, stating where we were climbing and when we expected to return. When we got down, we signed in so no one would try to rescue us.

I last used it sometime around 1973, when I signed out for my first, unsuccessful, try of the North Buttress of Lower Cathedral Rock. We had to fill out a registration card, one of whose blanks was "D.O.B." One of our party was unfamiliar with the term. Dennis Oakeschott told him it stood for "dead on buttress." Maybe that's why we failed on that attempt.

John
dave729

Trad climber
Western America
Apr 16, 2015 - 11:17am PT
A simple glance at the 'news' shows that if the social media rumor mill
gets started on 'Wilderness Regs Discriminate Against Gay Bolt Hole Drillers'
mountains will be moved to appease their vindictive rage.


Messages 1 - 10 of total 10 in this topic
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta