Climate Change skeptics? [ot]

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 6161 - 6180 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Jul 24, 2013 - 09:29am PT
Easy on the nail pounders please.

wilbeer

Mountain climber
honeoye falls,ny.greeneck alleghenys
Jul 24, 2013 - 11:40am PT
Yep.

Probably pretty good on a steep roof also.
rick sumner

Trad climber
reno, nevada/ wasilla alaska
Jul 24, 2013 - 12:06pm PT
Yeah, Ed is a good man with a keen analytical mind and a gift for writing in a clear concise manner. He could teach us lowly nail pounders many things we could never understand about the natural world around us on our own. Unfortunately though, he's hitched his horse to the wrong wagon here. The wheels are coming off and the new natural world models are passing him by. Thanks a lot Bruce for your good cheer. Time to go back to slumber till their is something more substantial to argue.
dirtbag

climber
Jul 24, 2013 - 12:20pm PT
^^^^^ Christ, what an idiot. ^^^^^
Paul Martzen

Trad climber
Fresno
Jul 24, 2013 - 12:30pm PT
Funny analogy Dingus.

Riley posted the following link on another thread.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kpigok-lVK4

It has a very good explanation of changes in the jet stream that account for both unusually cold weather as well as unusually hot weather. As the arctic warms there is less temperature difference between the arctic and the tropics so the air flow between slows down a bit. This results in a slower jet stream. Like on a slower river, the bends and loops of the jet stream become larger and slower. The air in the jet stream flows from west to east, but the waves, bends and loops of the jet stream also gradually move from west to east. As the air slows down, the bends get larger and move slower.

The jet stream forms a dividing line between hot tropical air on the south side and cold air on the north side. With larger bends in the jet stream, hot air gets to move much further north where the jet stream bends further north and cold air gets to move much further south where the jet stream bends much further south. Since the bends of the jet stream are moving slower, the unusual weather remains for much longer in each location.

This explains how rather large changes in local weather can result from fairly small changes in average temperature.
bobinc

Trad climber
Portland, Or
Jul 24, 2013 - 01:20pm PT
To continue Rick Sumner's analogy: he himself is hitched to a Hot Wheel.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Jul 24, 2013 - 01:34pm PT
Rick's ideology makes him science-proof, no need for him to read, understand or engage a single word that Ed wrote. Or Tricouni wrote, for that matter. But Ed does a brilliant job day after day, helped by others, showing and telling how science works for the benefit of readers with minds less tightly nailed shut.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Jul 24, 2013 - 01:55pm PT
On a more positive note, just looked through the latest issue of Eos and found this:

Tropical storm Sandy was a 1-in-700-year event
...
Using information of tropical cyclone tracks for the whole North Atlantic from 1950 to 2010, Hall and Sobel calculated the odds that a similar storm—a category 1 or higher hurricane with an approach angle to New Jersey at least as close to perpendicular as Sandy—could happen again. According to the authors’ statistical model, the occurrence rate of a Sandy- style storm is 0.0014 per year, meaning that if future hurricane activity matches the recent past, a storm like Sandy could be expected on average about once every 700 years.

The fact that Sandy happened, the authors say, means either that New York and New Jersey were very unlucky or that climate change has increased the probability of a Sandy- like storm beyond what they found with their steady- climate statistical model.

(Geophysical Research Letters, doi:10.1002/grl.50395, 2013)


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EO300011/abstract
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Jul 24, 2013 - 02:03pm PT
And from last week's Eos (I'm just catching up), this note:

Decade of climate extremes

The first decade of the 21st century was the warmest decade recorded since modern measurements began around 1850, according to a 3 July report by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO). In addition, a pronounced increase in the global temperature occurred over the 4 decades between 1971 and 2010.

The report, The Global Climate 2001–2010: A Decade of Climate Extremes, also noted that the decade of 2001–2010 was marked by dramatic climate and weather extremes, including the European heat wave of 2003; floods in Pakistan in 2010; Hurricane Katrina, which hit the U.S. Gulf Coast in 2005; and long-term droughts in the Amazon Basin, Australia, and East Africa. “Many of these events and trends can be explained by the natural variability of the climate system. Rising atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases, however, are also affecting the climate. Detecting the respective roles being played by climate variability and humanity- induced climate change is one of the key challenges facing researchers today,” the report states.

“WMO’s report shows that global warming was significant from 1971 to 2010 and that the decadal rate of increase between 1991–2000 and 2001–2010 was unprecedented,” said WMO secretary- general Michel Jarraud. “Rising concentrations of heat-trapping greenhouse gases are changing our climate, with far- reaching implications for our environment and our oceans, which are absorbing both carbon dioxide and heat.”


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EO290003/abstract
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 24, 2013 - 02:29pm PT
This is just too darn funny to not repost:

Unfortunately though, he's hitched his horse to the wrong wagon here. The wheels are coming off and the new natural world models are passing him by.


Hahahaha, the wheels are coming off... What a joke. But what do you expect from a person who can only put value into their preset beliefs.

Rick, time to take a good look at why you believe what you do, because it doesn't seem to be based in the reality as we folks on Earth experience it.

But do carry on, it provides my day with some good chuckles.
Chiloe

Trad climber
Lee, NH
Jul 24, 2013 - 04:48pm PT
Ron, what exactly did you say about the jet stream, that earned you accusations of silliness?

Here's something on the general topic that I (and a coauthor) said recently:

"Recent studies explore links between Arctic warming and mid-latitude winters or weather extremes (Screen and Simon 2013), including the dramatic experience of Superstorm Sandy (Greene et al. 2013). Decreased summer Arctic sea-ice extent has been linked to the development of high-amplitude wave patterns during winter, increasing the frequency cold weather outbreaks across the mid-latitudes (Overland and Wang 2010; Francis and Vavrus 2012; Tang et al. 2013). Observations also indicate a connection between amplified wave patterns driven by changes in Arctic climate and increased early winter snowfall, early snow melt, extreme summer heat and drought (Francis and Vavrus 2012; Greene and Monger 2012; Greene et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2012; Petoukhov et al. 2012)."
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Jul 24, 2013 - 05:05pm PT
you found someone with respected credentials that agrees, Chief!

but even a blind squirrel finds an acorn from time to time....

how does presenting this Judith person magically negate the consensus of the majority of Climate Scientist?

I wanna go to the Island for race week before I croak, Chief..
monolith

climber
SF bay area
Jul 24, 2013 - 05:52pm PT
Not much of a pause, once you remove some of the natural variability.


http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/6/4/044022
lostinshanghai

Social climber
someplace
Jul 24, 2013 - 06:41pm PT
“Words of warning wisdom from Real Climate Scientist and not some ST fanatic left wing zealot "Nailers".”

Judith A. Curry is the chairman of the School of Earth and Atmospheric
Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology

She gets her funding from the Koch brothers: Stupid. Spreads disinformation just like you.

Then again maybe they are paying you to spread the disinformation.

Which is it? Stupid or for the Koch brothers.
lostinshanghai

Social climber
someplace
Jul 24, 2013 - 09:30pm PT
Just like where you have to chase the money the same with who or whom is behind all the crap that comes out in election time or anything: is it left leaning or right leaning there is nothing in-between; use to be something years ago “the middle” but not the case anymore.

Just punch her name and put the Brotheeeeers next to it a few things will come up.

You can start here:

http://www.alhea.com/ego5/search/web?fcoid=417&fcop=topnav&fpid=27&q=who%20are%20the%20koch%20brothers&ql=&gclid=CLmuu8-oybgCFcU5QgodeisAug

Ok! I will give you a break:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/koch-brothers-climate-change_n_3530397.html?utm_hp_ref=koch-brothers

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/21/free-market-economics-science_n_3128472.html?utm_hp_ref=koch-brothers

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/07/koch-brothers-database-2012-election

Wonder if NSA kept the files as well, no they have their own secret Data system for watching.

Whole section devoted for just these two guys, their daddy who helped create the John Birch Society should be in there somewhere but everyone knows that already:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/koch-brothers/

But if you need; I think I just found it:

Richard Muller, Charles Koch, Judith Curry and the implosion of the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study
By Joe Romm on Feb 14, 2011 at 3:45 pm ClimateProgress

http://thinkprogress.org/

How to kill a potentially not-bad idea in 5 easy steps

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2011/02/14/207519/exclusive-richard-muller-charles-koch-judith-curry-and-the-implosion-of-the-berkeley-earth-surface-temperature-study/?mobile=nc

Who in hell is Berkeley Earth

http://berkeleyearth.org

Opps still does not show the donors:

http://berkeleyearth.org/donors/

They go by Anonymous donors as well

Gates name there as well he has all his products made in China why pollute the US. He wants or is creating new tech for cleaner nuclear reactors.
k-man

Gym climber
SCruz
Topic Author's Reply - Jul 24, 2013 - 10:18pm PT
The House of Climate Science Cards are a crumbling.


Wait for the next IPCC report to come out around Sept., and you won't be singing that song, The Chief.


But then again, you'll toss out the whole lot from real climate scientists because what do they know, right?


Good thing the Koch brothers are funding some real research, everybody else is just in it for the money.
Norton

Social climber
the Wastelands
Jul 24, 2013 - 10:29pm PT
Guys, the Chief knows all this

he is just having fun jerking your chains

he agrees with all the findings, he just doesn't agree that humans can or should be doing anything about it, especially given that any resources be better put to use to immediately mitigate human misery

he is trolling for his own entertainment, he has said so

kunlun_shan

Mountain climber
SF, CA
Jul 25, 2013 - 12:24am PT
The Chief - study up, dude!

[Click to View YouTube Video]

edit - The Chief (down arrow) - I knew you'd appreciate this :) you do have a sense of humour!

btw. Brutus represented for the E Bay !!! EBMUD, baby!
rottingjohnny

Sport climber
mammoth lakes ca
Jul 25, 2013 - 12:29am PT
Kunlan..Chief smokes his own home grown...?
Tricouni

Mountain climber
Vancouver
Jul 25, 2013 - 12:40am PT
Bruce, don't waste your time with this guy. Not worth it.

Sorry you didn't make it to the Squam festival on the weekend.

Glenn
Messages 6161 - 6180 of total 17219 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta