Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
Big
climber
|
|
|
Dec 15, 2006 - 03:07pm PT
|
CG, how does it feel to be a p0rn star now? The other half of team boob grab will be so proud of you.
|
|
Crimpergirl
Social climber
St. Louis
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 09:15am PT
|
Well Big, that's why God gave us two boobs. haha.
|
|
dirtineye
Trad climber
the south
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 10:06am PT
|
This does bring up a question.
IF you password protect your photobucket account, then you link to a pic, can the pic be saved or linked to by someone else without your password?
|
|
Blowboarder
Boulder climber
Back in the mix
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 12:11pm PT
|
By anyone with minimal knowledge of HTML or even someone who knows how to use the img tags.
Save yourself the grief ladies and just email me all your nekkid pics directly.
|
|
dirtineye
Trad climber
the south
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 04:22pm PT
|
Well then, blowmeharder, I'll just take down the pics of you in the clown suit.
I don't think even the porn sites are ready for those.
|
|
Blowboarder
Boulder climber
Back in the mix
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 07:48pm PT
|
Feck, fess up and admit you're Ghotse already.
|
|
quartziteflight
climber
|
|
|
Dec 16, 2006 - 11:29pm PT
|
crimpergirl, you're probably running a p0rn empire... hee hee
Dirtystalkerguy,
When you're setting up your picture hosting accounts I think you can prevent peeps from being able to link and view your photos w/in the dimensions of your account. I could be wrong though,,,
|
|
dirtineye
Trad climber
the south
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 12:05am PT
|
Thaks quartzcrammedupA$$guy.
|
|
John Moosie
climber
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 12:26am PT
|
Hi Locker,
Imagine if you had a sister who climbed. You take a picture of her and post it here.
Someone takes that picture and puts it on a porno site along with a picture of a women who looks remarkably like her in a pornographic pose, suggesting that your sister liked to climb and liked, oh, say gangbangs.
How would you feel?
|
|
Blowboarder
Boulder climber
Back in the mix
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 01:10am PT
|
please, think about the donkeys!
err, children.
yeah, that's it.
|
|
LuckyPink
climber
the last bivy
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 01:14am PT
|
trouble is porn is not just pics of a bunch of happy people having sex.. pornography is about violence, intimidation and disrespect, not about sex. Open that magazine , or click that site.. you see women mostly, men on the gay sites, and children all posing in provacative , demeaning stances for what? For you to feel like a BIG powerful horny man..instead of.. ? Those people are there for all the many reasons that people become victimized. The face of that woman (if there is a face) says "here .. you don't have to know me, appreciate me, respect me, or even have any feeling for me at all.. just use me." That's why finding pictures of loved ones on porn sites is so horrific.
|
|
oldtopangalizard
Social climber
ca
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 08:22am PT
|
I agree with pink. I like sex as much as the next guy, but you don't have to be a sick f*ck about it.
|
|
dirtineye
Trad climber
the south
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 09:09am PT
|
Actually. pornography does not have to be disgusting or demeaning.
Unfortunately, some people really like their sex that way though. I don't understand that, and I don't want to understand it.
I've usually not too comfortable with what amounts to watching other people have sex, whether it be loving and mutually wonderful, or the vile sort of stuff described above.
I studied art for a number of years and did loads of live model nude figure drawing, and I believe it is fairly simple to seperate eroticism from the naked body, and the beauty of the human form from sexual attraction.
Anyway, porn includes erotic art, as well as a lot of really gross stuff.
And don't forget, two girls plus crappy music is a BAD combination!!
|
|
Crimpergirl
Social climber
St. Louis
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 06:52pm PT
|
Pornography by definition is disgusting and demeaning and that is why it is illegal. The difficulty of course is coming to any agreement about what is disgusting and demeaning.
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 07:00pm PT
|
Does this qualify?
|
|
Ouch!
climber
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 07:04pm PT
|
How about this?
|
|
Crimpergirl
Social climber
St. Louis
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 07:35pm PT
|
OUCH! you have absolutely outdone yourself! I new era in OUCH! art has begun. Fantastic!
|
|
Crimpergirl
Social climber
St. Louis
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 09:30pm PT
|
Well Locker, if porn is not illegal, I suggest you contact the Supreme Court. Their opinions seems to differ on what constitutes obscene materials/porn. We are discussing semantics though. I'm done with this thread.
|
|
Curt
Boulder climber
Gilbert, AZ
|
|
|
Dec 17, 2006 - 09:36pm PT
|
"...Pornography by definition is disgusting and demeaning and that is why it is illegal. The difficulty of course is coming to any agreement about what is disgusting and demeaning..."
CG has it right, of course. It was actually one of our past Supreme Court Justices who said "I can't tell you exactly what pornography is, but I know it when I see it."
Curt
|
|
LuckyPink
climber
the last bivy
|
|
|
Dec 18, 2006 - 12:11am PT
|
Not all things sexual are pornographic.. sexuality is something that can be celebrated, sensual, voluptuous, revered and native to our most spiritual selves. Pornography is exhibitionism, based in a power gradient, hurts people who use and are used. It does not improve the human spirit. It brings degradation to those caught in the industry on any level. Pornography separates sexual arousal from the feeling of deep regard or love. Often it connects sexual arousal to violence and objectification of human beings.
Ouch's pics , on the other hand, tend to improve the human spirit, unless, of course , Woody is being exploited?
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!