ThirdPartyGuiltTrip — November 12, 2010 — China {97% chance} test fired an ICBM 35 miles off the coast of Los Angeles as a show of strength, direct repudiation of the U.S. meddling in the South China Sea, on the heels of The Feds announcement of devaluing the USD, all while our fearless 'leader' 'obama' and Hitler-y Clinton were overseas, &, it was just a beautiful sunset, perfect for launching missiles. I saw the smoke column my self while walking - It was not 'an illusion'. So, let's compare these 2 contradicting viewpoints - A.) Ret. General Tom Micinerney "It was a missile" B.) Michio Kaku "It was an optical illusion" Just thought I'd compare these two clips, too not only point out that it was completely obvious a missile 35 miles off the Coast of Los Angeles, but that Michi Kaku, a theoretical physicist has lost all credibility. So, we have a credible Ret. General and former fighter pilot, Ret. General Tom Micinerney vs. the idiotic, Zero credibility junk science Big Bang/String Theory/Dark Matter/Energy pusher Michio Kaku. CONTRADICTIONS & LIES ------------------------------<wbr>------------- Michio Kaku contradicts himself 3 times in this clip. 1.) 1:54 He refers to the object as a rocket. An ICBM is guided rocket yes, but he knows full well that ICBM's don't have 'booster rockets' attached to the side. No one was claiming that this was a space shuttle launch. Moreover, you can clearly see the single, burning halo on that back of this object, indicating a single engine. 2.) 2:10 "It's going in the wrong direction" We NEVER fire missiles headed towards the West!?!?! Yet, this completely absolves his own argument - If this object is coming towards us, {East to West} is Kaku claiming that this 'plane' took off from the surface of the Pacific Ocean, based on the path of this so-called 'contrail' ??? {Maybe they were skimming the water to do some fly fishing before NEVER LANDING at LAX} If it was traveling east to West, why didn't it land at LAX? What flight was it? What airline? 3.) 3:17 "We see no evidence of a fast moving object" Really Michio? What's that on the f*#kin screen behind you??? Do we not ALL "see a fast moving object" right nex to Kaku's head? Is this not "video evidence"? Besides, if it had stealth capability or was being covered-up by the military, how accurate would those radar records be? Also, if this were a commercial flight, it has yet to be ID'd, flight number, airline, ect. Other blatant and obvious f*#k-ups from Kaku... 2:00 He keeps calling it a 'contrail' when it has a clear and obvious 'corkscrew' pattern indicating a rocket or... a missile. 'Contrails', as opposed to 'chemtrails' linger for 15-20 minutes maximum, this one was there for over an hour. Sorry pal, wrong again! 1:54 "The object is no accelerating" Really Michio? The how the FOCK is it rocketing into the stratosphere? 2:07 "Ballistic missiles never change course" uhh... yeah they do retard. Please see the ret. General @ 0:44 "meaning that the guidance system has now kicked in" ICBM's are 'guided missiles' dumbass!

The video of what looks for all the world like the contrail of a missile was shot Monday evening by KCBS cameraman Gil Leyvas from a news helicopter over Los Angeles.

"I saw a big plume coming up, rising from looked like beyond the horizon and it continued to grow," Leyvas said.

He zoomed his camera in and stayed on it for about 10 minutes. To him it looked like an incoming missile.

"It was unique. It was moving," he said. "It was growing in the sky."

I swore off this dumb thread, but I can't help myself I guess.

And the cameraman never said it was coming toward the coast.

I like PhD Michio Kaku, but here he is really wrong.
I hope he comes around to the truth and admits he is wrong when it is overwhelming proved. That will not be good for his reputation.

1. ICBMs are by definition intercontinental - they aren't launched from submarines.