Kill Team photos care of Rolling Stone - OT

Search
Go

Discussion Topic

Return to Forum List
This thread has been locked
Messages 41 - 60 of total 66 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
FeelioBabar

Trad climber
One drink ahead of my past.
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:09pm PT
Golsen's spot on as usual.

if we ever have to go to war, with anyone...it should be SO F*#KING BRUTAL that no one ever wants to get into it with us again. Period.

anything less is bullsh#t, and disservice to those put in harms way.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:09pm PT
I'm glad that in this changing world some things remain constant. You, bluering, can always be counted on as being the most ignorant idiot on Supertopo.

You cannot read an article and make up your own mind, you need someone liek Breitbart or Rush Limbraugh to tell you what to think. Breitbart is not reporting on this, they are mouthing off. If you read the article you can see that they bullshit is on them.

Dude, when I saw this story break, I called BS on it. It's common sense if you watch the videos. Ooooh, somebody got shot in a war zone!!!! OMG!!!

Mason, they found the mineral deposits AFTER we got there and the development teams started to do some 'digging'.

No war for minerals!!! Is that the new mantra? I thought it was an ultra-classified war by the CIA to grab all the opium, or some sh#t...

I mean, heaven forbid, we bomb the muther f*#kers who were harboring OBL in the wake of 9/11, admitted to it, and refused to hand his ass over!!!

No, it was a war for mineral deposits. Yeah.

You guys are really reaching now.


EDIT:

Golsen's spot on as usual.

if we ever have to go to war, with anyone...it should be SO F*#KING BRUTAL that no one ever wants to get into it with us again. Period.

anything less is bullsh#t, and disservice to those put in harms way.

Yep.

graniteclimber

Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:13pm PT
The motivation is for money. Appeal to peoples sense of injustice and capitalize on it.

That's Fox News, Breitbart, Limbaugh, Glenn Beck.

No integrity. They just play to their audience. It's easy. You to Bluering someone he doesn't like is a "communist" and he'll get down on his knees for you.
Mtnmun

Trad climber
Top of the Mountain Mun
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:16pm PT
War makes huge profits for a very few. Humanitarian help would get us much farther than bullets. A majority of casualities in war are civilians. WE make way more enemies with bombs than with aid and diplomacy.

If we had not invaded Iraq, we would not be in the financial mess we are in today. That money could have gone to our schools, infrastructure and communities.

War is a lose lose situation.
graniteclimber

Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:17pm PT
if we ever have to go to war, with anyone...it should be SO F*#KING BRUTAL that no one ever wants to get into it with us again. Period.

That was the approach that the Nazis took. How did it work out for them?

It was the approach the Soviets took. How did that work for them?

It's also the approach that Gaddafi took and is still taking. How is it working out for him?

You make enough people hate you enough and they will take you down.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:19pm PT
War makes huge profits for a very few. Humanitarian help would get us much farther than bullets. A majority of casualities in war are civilians. WE make way more enemies with bombs than with aid and diplomacy.

Explain that to the families of the dead UN 'aid' workers who were killed, including 2 who were beheaded.

Can you?

EDIT:

That was the approach that the Nazis took. How did it work out for them?

It was the approach the Soviets took. How did that work for them?

It's also the approach that Gaddafi took and is still taking. How is it working out for him?

You make enough people hate you enough and they will take you down.


You're either crazy or drunk. We're Nazi's now? Stalinists?
Mason

Trad climber
Yay Area
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 1, 2011 - 06:20pm PT
Again Bluering with the ignorant comments.

The Russians have known about these minerals for 40 years. China is developing and mining in Afghanistan right now.

Wake up, man.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:23pm PT
So, Mason, we just decided to wait till after 9/11 to bomb the Talibunnies? Why not carpet-bomb them sooner?

If China is harvesting, how do we get any? You're right. I must be stupid.
Mason

Trad climber
Yay Area
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 1, 2011 - 06:28pm PT
I'm not arguing with you, Blue. It's impossible to argue with neocons even when you present concrete facts.

It's like trying to tell a bible beater that dinosaurs existed more than 3000 years ago.
bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:33pm PT
I'm not arguing with you, Blue. It's impossible to argue with neocons even when you present concrete facts.


Yeah, a war for minerals is a 'concrete fact'. How stupid of me....I should have seen that!!!
Mason

Trad climber
Yay Area
Topic Author's Reply - Apr 1, 2011 - 06:35pm PT
You sure know how to twist stuff around, Blue.

I'll say it again.

The Soviets have known that there are minerals in Afghanistan for 40 years now.

The Chinese have been mining these minerals long before the story was released.

You said that we didn't know about the minerals before 9/11.

Well, if that's the case, our "intelligence" sucks.

Edit: And god forbid we go to war over resources. How silly would that be?
TGT

Social climber
So Cal
Apr 1, 2011 - 06:38pm PT
Calling BULLSH#T on Rolling Stone
29 March 2011

Seldom do I waste time with rebutting articles, and especially not from publications like Rolling Stone. Today, numerous people sent links to the latest Rolling Stone tripe. The story is titled “THE KILL TEAM, THE FULL STORY.” It should be titled: “BULLSH#T, from Rolling Stone.”

The story—not really an “article”—covers Soldiers from 5/2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) in Afghanistan. A handful of Soldiers were accused of murder. It does in fact appear that a tiny group of rogues committed premeditated murder. I was embedded with the 5/2 SBCT and was afforded incredible access to the brigade by the Commander, Colonel Harry Tunnell, and the brigade Command Sergeant Major, Robb Prosser. I know Robb from Iraq. Colonel Tunnell had been shot in Iraq.

The brigade gave me open access. I could go anywhere, anytime, so long as I could find a ride, which never was a problem beyond normal combat problems. If they had something to hide, it was limited and I didn’t find it. I was not with the Soldiers accused of murder and had no knowledge of this. It is important to note that the murder allegations were not discovered by media vigilance, but by, for instance, at least one Soldier in that tiny unit who was appalled by the behavior. A brigade is a big place with thousands of Soldiers, and in Afghanistan they were spread thinly across several provinces because we decided to wage war with too few troops. Those Soldiers accused of being involved in (or who should have been knowledgeable of) the murders could fit into a minivan. You would need ten 747s for the rest of the Brigade who did their duty. I was with many other Soldiers from 5/2 SBCT. My overall impression was very positive. After scratching my memory for negative impressions from 5/2 Soldiers, I can’t think of any, actually, other than the tiny Kill Team who, to my knowledge, I never set eyes upon.

The online edition of the Rolling Stone story contains a section with a video called “Motorcycle Kill,” which includes our Soldiers gunning down Taliban who were speeding on a motorcycle toward our guys. These Soldiers were also with 5/2 SBCT, far away from the “Kill Team” later accused of the murders. Rolling Stone commits a literary “crime” by deceptively entwining this normal combat video with the Kill Team story. The Taliban on the motorcycle were killed during an intense operation in the Arghandab near Kandahar City. People who have been to the Arghandab realize the extreme danger there. The Soviets got beaten horribly in the Arghandab, despite throwing everything including the Soviet kitchen sink into the battle that lasted over a month. Others fared little better. To my knowledge, 5/2 and supporting units were the first ever to take Arghandab, and these two dead Taliban were part of that process.

The killing of the armed Taliban on the motorcycle was legal and within the rules of engagement. Law and ROE are related but separate matters. In any case, the killing was well within both the law and ROE. The Taliban on the back of the motorcycle raised his rifle to fire at our Soldiers but the rifle did not fire. I talked at length with several of the Soldiers who were there and they gave me the video. There was nothing to hide. I didn’t even know about the story until they told me. It can be good for Soldiers to shoot and share videos because it provides instant replay and lessons learned. When they gave me the video and further explained what happened, I found the combat so normal that I didn’t even bother publishing it, though I should have because that little shooting of the two Taliban was the least of the accomplishments of these Soldiers, and it rid the Arghandab of two Taliban.

Some people commented that our Soldiers used excessive force by firing too many bullets. Hogwash. And besides, they were trying to kill each other. Anyone who has seen much combat with our weak M-4 rifles realizes that one shot is generally not enough, and the Taliban were speeding at them on a motorbike, which very often are prepared as suicide bombs. If that motorcycle had been a bomb, as they often are, and got inside the group of Soldiers and exploded, they could all have been killed. Just yesterday, in Paktika, three suicide attackers came in, guns blazing, and detonated a huge truck bomb. Depending on which reports you read, about twenty workers were killed and about another fifty wounded.

In the video, our guys would have been justified in firing twice that many bullets, but at some point you are wasting ammo and that is a combat sin. The Soldiers involved in that shooting told me that the Taliban on the back may have pulled the AK trigger, but the loaded AK did not fire because the Taliban didn’t have a round in the chamber. Attention to detail. At least one also had an ammunition rack strapped across his chest.


This could go on for pages, but Rolling Stone is not worth it, and thrashing them might only build their readership. I’ve found in the past that boycotts work. I led a boycott against one magazine and it went bankrupt. It’s doubtful that Rolling Stone will go bankrupt for its sins, but you can cost them money not by boycotting their magazine, but by boycotting their advertisers. That hurts. Just pick an advertiser whose products you already buy, boycott it, and tell the advertiser why you are not buying their product.

Now I’ve got to get back to work.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Miachel Yon


bluering

Trad climber
Santa Clara, CA
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:13pm PT
Mason, so you're saying we went to war for minerals??
golsen

Social climber
kennewick, wa
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:37pm PT
TGT there is a point there.

Just because we have murderers and rapists in our society at large does not mean that we all are. The "kill team" is simply a microcosm of our society and yet we expect better from our military. But we let them down upon their return and turn on them when there is a bad one in the bunch.
graniteclimber

Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:39pm PT
TGT, the Breitbart article calls "bullshit" but the bullshit is on them. The point of the article is: "Rolling Stone commits a literary “crime” by deceptively entwining this normal combat video with the Kill Team story."

I read the RS story--there is no "deceptive entwining" -- only an idiot who can't read would confuse the video as being the work of the kill team. The video was part of the kill team's extensive collection of "war porn."


http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/photos/motorcyle-kill-20110327/0692075

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-kill-team-20110327?page=1
graniteclimber

Trad climber
The Illuminati -- S.P.E.C.T.R.E. Division
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:40pm PT
Now we know where Bluering gets his "news" from

Beck Vastly Overstates Criticism In Order To Attack Rolling Stone Exposé

March 30, 2011 5:23 pm ET by Sean Easter

Today on his radio show, Glenn Beck took issue with a recent Rolling Stone exposé of military misconduct in Afghanistan, claiming that the article was evidence of "radicals making our troops look like baby killers to everyone else on planet Earth."

For those who haven't read the rather lengthy Rolling Stone article, it documents a small group of American soldiers in Afghanistan who allegedly staged attacks in order to arbitrarily murder Afghan civilians. Some are still facing charges, others are already convicted. In addition, some in the group reportedly took part in rather ghastly instances of battlefield misconduct: posing for photographs with enemy dead and collecting body parts as war trophies, for example. Beck supported his claim by citing an article by independent war journalist Michael Yon. Naturally, the article was also highlighted on Beck's website, The Blaze. Beck said that Yon had been embedded with the brigade in the Rolling Stone story, going on to assert that Yon "was there the whole time," "said none of that ever happened," and had called the story "completely a hack job." (Full transcript after the jump.)

Only Yon never wrote anything of the kind.

Far from suggesting that the entire Rolling Stone article is "completely a hack job," Yon wrote that "It does in fact appear that a tiny group of rogues committed premeditated murder." Yon further noted that while he was embedded with the brigade the soldiers were in, he "was not with the Soldiers accused of murder." Yon's major criticism of the article is that the brigade to which the accused were assigned largely conducted themselves professionally and ethically. Yon does take issue with the online version of the Rolling Stone story, specifically its inclusion of a video circulated by, but not featuring, members of the so-called "kill team." In Yon's view, it is unjust to associate soldiers conducting themselves lawfully and within rules of engagement with a mixed group of alleged or convicted murderers who, reportedly, committed a number gruesome acts that are, if not prosecutable war crimes, at least within the realm of what the common mind considers war atrocities. From Yon's article (emphasis added):

The story -- not really an "article" -- covers Soldiers from 5/2 Stryker Brigade Combat Team (SBCT) in Afghanistan. A handful of Soldiers were accused of murder. It does in fact appear that a tiny group of rogues committed premeditated murder. I was embedded with the 5/2 SBCT and was afforded incredible access to the brigade by the Commander, Colonel Harry Tunnell, and the brigade Command Sergeant Major, Robb Prosser. I know Robb from Iraq. Colonel Tunnell had been shot in Iraq.

The brigade gave me open access. I could go anywhere, anytime, so long as I could find a ride, which never was a problem beyond normal combat problems. If they had something to hide, it was limited and I didn't find it. I was not with the Soldiers accused of murder and had no knowledge of this. It is important to note that the murder allegations were not discovered by media vigilance, but by, for instance, at least one Soldier in that tiny unit who was appalled by the behavior. A brigade is a big place with thousands of Soldiers, and in Afghanistan they were spread thinly across several provinces because we decided to wage war with too few troops. Those Soldiers accused of being involved in (or who should have been knowledgeable of) the murders could fit into a minivan. You would need ten 747s for the rest of the Brigade who did their duty. I was with many other Soldiers from 5/2 SBCT. My overall impression was very positive. After scratching my memory for negative impressions from 5/2 Soldiers, I can't think of any, actually, other than the tiny Kill Team who, to my knowledge, I never set eyes upon.

The online edition of the Rolling Stone story contains a section with a video called "Motorcycle Kill," which includes our Soldiers gunning down Taliban who were speeding on a motorcycle toward our guys. These Soldiers were also with 5/2 SBCT, far away from the "Kill Team" later accused of the murders. Rolling Stone commits a literary "crime" by deceptively entwining this normal combat video with the Kill Team story.

It's worth noting that Yon's feigned outrage over the video is not really merited: text that accompanies the Rolling Stone video clearly states that though the video was circulated by the "kill team," those featured therein are from "another battalion" in the brigade than those soldiers accused of atrocities. From Rolling Stone:

The clip presented here is excerpted from 'Motorcycle Kill,' a video collected and shared by members of the "kill team" of U.S. soldiers who murdered civilians in Afghanistan and mutilated the corpses. The jumpy, 30-minute video -- shot by soldiers believed to be with another battalion in the 5th Stryker Brigade -- shows American troops gunning down two Afghans on a motorcycle who may have been armed. Even if the killings were part of a legitimate combat engagement, however, it is a clear violation of Army standards to share such footage. ['Motorcycle Kill,' Rolling Stone, 3/27/11]

True, Yon's title, "Calling BULLSH#T on Rolling Stone," and his call to boycott the magazine's advertisers both seem to take a stab at the credibility of the entire article. Nonetheless, the text of Yon's post does not challenge the central facts of the Rolling Stone story. Gory details removed, the central plot is that a small group of soldiers broke the law and that, before a physician's assistant discovered welts left on a soldier beaten by the "kill team" intent on keeping him quiet, the officers in charge of them failed to stop their misconduct. Yon is upset that reporting these events reflects poorly on the bulk of the brigade that served honorably, but he does not contest those facts.

But none that information makes its way to Glenn Beck's audience, because none of those facts support Beck's bogus narrative that some vaguely defined group of "radicals" wants to convince US citizens and the rest of the world that US troops are "baby killers." There is no evidence of a conspiracy of radicals hell-bent on portraying our troops as vicious, indiscriminant monsters. The real narrative here is much simpler: there was despicable misconduct, charges were filed, and Rolling Stone reported it. End of story.

From the March 30 edition of Beck's radio show:

BECK: By the way, there's a story on TheBlaze.com that you must read today. It is "BS from Rolling Stone." This is a journalist that is attacking the magazine's "kill team" story. This is part of a theory that I have that -- in fact, Stu, see if you can get him on tomorrow, Michael Yon.

STU BURGUIERE (executive producer): Yeah. OK.

BECK: See if you can get Michael Yon on. He is a guy who wrote a story, and it's posted on The Blaze, and he's saying that the Rolling Stone magazine is committing a crime against our troops. He said -- journalistic crime. He said that, you know, the motorcycle video -- have you seen, have you heard anyone talk about the motorcycle video?

BURGUIERE: Yeah. Oh yeah, yeah.

BECK: And they just kill people on these motorcycles, right? Is that the way it's?

BURGUIERE: It's been the spin, yeah.

BECK: Yeah, that's the spin.

BURGUIERE: Part of the kill team. These people just drive motorcycles down the street, just get shot for no reason.

BECK: He said --

PAT GRAY (co-host): Civilians.

BECK: He was with that brigade. He was there the whole time. He said none of that ever happened. He said I had full access. He said the motorcycle -- he said, I had the tape before they had the tape. He said the motorcycle thing, that was -- that's within the rules of engagement. That's what they were supposed to do. Those were Taliban members. Shoot them. He said, so it was completely a hack job by the Rolling Stone magazine. What our troops are going through, we -- the last piece that they must have is the troops. They must bog them down. They must make them into baby killers. If they can't make them into baby killers to you, they'll make them into baby killers to everybody else on planet Earth. And that's what this story is all about. The radicals making our troops look like baby killers to everyone else on planet Earth. You must stand up for the troops as well. You've got to get out as much good as you can. You've got to tell them every time you see them. You stop them and say, thank you for what you do. Thank you. I know you guys are under attack and a lot of things don't make sense but we're with you. And make sure they know who you are. See it at TheBlaze.com.

cintune

climber
Midvale School for the Gifted
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:43pm PT

If I had ten divisions of those men our troubles here would be over very quickly. You have to have men who are moral and at the same time who are able to utilize their primordial instincts to kill without feeling, without passion, without judgment, without judgment. Because it’s judgment that defeats us.

Of course, this was a madman talking. But war is orchestrated madness. So there's that.
Karl Baba

Trad climber
Yosemite, Ca
Apr 1, 2011 - 07:51pm PT
Bottom line, These wars have cost trillions of dollars we don't have, haven't really shrunk Al Queda, which has never had much power to strike us except where we're stupid, and never got Bin Laden.

They're a stupid excuse for us to churn our military industrial complex that lives by making things go boom. Our economy would collapse without involvement in wars or selling weapons to dictators that we later go to war with.

After 9-11, it would have been equally valid to invade Saudi Arabia where almost all the hijackers were from and where money for the operation came from, but heck, we already had kind of a deal with them where Bush was kissing their lips.

Peace

Karl
Splater

climber
Grey Matter
Apr 1, 2011 - 08:07pm PT
Going back to Gen Stanley McChrystal,
I think this sentence from Rolling Stone is quite relevant.
"But part of the problem is personal: In private, Team McChrystal likes to talk sh#t about many of Obama's top people on the diplomatic side."
Sh#t talking about Obama is quite common in the military, and if a top guy is part of it, then he's got to go.
Mighty Hiker

climber
Vancouver, B.C.
Apr 1, 2011 - 08:11pm PT
For those who haven't read the rather lengthy Rolling Stone article, it documents a small group of American soldiers in Afghanistan who allegedly staged attacks in order to arbitrarily murder Afghan civilians. Some are still facing charges, others are already convicted. In addition, some in the group reportedly took part in rather ghastly instances of battlefield misconduct: posing for photographs with enemy dead and collecting body parts as war trophies, for example.

Some of the soldiers have now been convicted, and so the incidents aren't "alleged" any more. They're proven facts, in particular the murder of an innocent Afghan teenager.

If I recall correctly, one of the soldiers involved in the murder confessed to it, has pled guilty, and is awaiting sentence. He tried to get his squad mates to confess with him, and was badly beaten by them.
Messages 41 - 60 of total 66 in this topic << First  |  < Previous  |  Show All  |  Next >  |  Last >>
Return to Forum List
 
Our Guidebooks
spacerCheck 'em out!
SuperTopo Guidebooks

guidebook icon
Try a free sample topo!

 
SuperTopo on the Web

Recent Route Beta