Discussion Topic |
|
This thread has been locked |
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
www.climbaddictdesigns.com
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 12:39pm PT
|
Just providing balance, Locker. Not unlike your images of the obese man and woman. Well, actually unlike that quite a bit, but there's nothing wrong with dialog(which is why I posted the link), is there?
Interesting to note that you chose an image of a woman which is a provocatively styled shot, and the male, balancing act, is not. Or aren't you aware that the female image you posted would be seen as sexually enticing to a cross section of people, and definitely money in the spank bank for the type who likes that?
And Philo, I think you really need to find some new material. We've all gotten the "joke" you've been making with that set of images. It's like you're at a party and keep telling the same knock, knock joke over and over....
And Dirtbag, just for clarity - I have never said liking booby pictures is "bad," I didn't see many of the images posted on that thread as "bad." My upset is over the intimidation/minimizing tactics deployed on anyone who doesn't see the aforementioned thread as the best thing since sliced bread that seem so prevalent in this thread.
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
www.climbaddictdesigns.com
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 12:44pm PT
|
It's actually not difficult to find, if one wanted to.
|
|
philo
Trad climber
Is that light the end of the tunnel or a train?
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 12:56pm PT
|
Now that is serious.
|
|
apogee
climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:04pm PT
|
'masturbate'
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
www.climbaddictdesigns.com
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:16pm PT
|
Well, Locker - I will not post an image. But I did Google "arrousing image of obese men " and then go through to the images version, and see one in the 3rd row of images. Not as well styled as your ladies image, but the intent is there nonetheless.
But, it was just something that I happened to think, when I saw your post. Not really THAT serious, especially in comparison to some of the other things which have come up in this thread.
And update(after the Elvis type image)- Locker, please don't minimize my input on this topic. While it may be very funny to some, and others are just goofing around because they are bored and unable to get out more(which I am guessing is why you post the way you do, as you have mentioned some health issues), I think I have been pretty clear that I don't think this is all a lark. To make fun of me, even in a light-hearted way(which I do believe is your intent), is actually inappropriate.
|
|
apogee
climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:24pm PT
|
'arousing'
|
|
TwistedCrank
climber
Dingleberry Gulch, Ideeho
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:25pm PT
|
You know. Rita Hayworth had some big breasts.
|
|
Big Mike
Trad climber
BC
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:34pm PT
|
Apogee = Websters?
|
|
apogee
climber
Technically expert, safe belayer, can lead if easy
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 01:36pm PT
|
'Websters?'
^^^
Only when it's.......
Serious.
|
|
happiegrrrl
Trad climber
www.climbaddictdesigns.com
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 03:43pm PT
|
Yes, I misspelled. Luckily, Google has some built in AI and searched using the correct spelling.
If SOME are still having SERIOUS issues concerning stuff like this...
I SERIOUSLY suggest that THIS is NOT the place to deal with them...
I'm not dealing with "my" personal issues on this thread. I am well aware what they are, have been working on them since at least the age of 13, and have found it is a lifelong process.
I am providing a viewpoint in this thread that apparently makes some people here uncomfortable. I don't mean you specifically, Locker, but to post what I quoted above is an attempt to silence those speaking out. You do realize that, don't you? That sort of manipulation comes in many levels, from fairly innocuous to flat out mental abuse. It's probably not a style you would consciously want to take.
For what it's worth, I have received more than a few private correspondences on what I have been posting, and there is support for my words. Not everyone is as willing and able to stand up against a crowd, but it happens to be one of the unintended consequences which resulted from my having "serious issues."
|
|
TwistedCrank
climber
Dingleberry Gulch, Ideeho
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 04:15pm PT
|
Raquel Welch had some fine white floaters as well.
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 04:20pm PT
|
Locker, this is so serious that people are emailing you?
Woo-freaking-hoo!
|
|
Largo
Sport climber
The Big Wide Open Face
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 04:32pm PT
|
Melissa wrote: Those of us whose age of consent was not respected are likely to be more concerned with the rights and well-being of the girls in the pictures who have been immortalized on the internet than we are with the old men who have obviously figured out how to appreciate the digital female form.
I would hazard to say that most of us men, young and old and in between, never had to "figure out" how to appreciate the female form. It's a natural reaction for which our survival owes the pleasure. However, her earlier sentence touches on what I mentioned earlier - strong reactions usually denote a history of sorts, often untoward, so sensitivity is indicated. It's mostly about the involuntary associations that accrue to a person, place or thing which determines our views; and everyone's past is not a glorious sunset. That's why a seemingly benign thread about a body part can trigger a Gorilla Monsoon of guff and emotional arcing.
JL
|
|
The Larry
climber
Moab, UT
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 04:33pm PT
|
There are seriously a lot of boobs on this thread.
|
|
Melissa
Gym climber
berkeley, ca
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 06:48pm PT
|
Largo...I know you and most men and many women too didn't need to learn to appreciate the female form. Finding pictures of boobies on the internet in order to be able to appreciate them is what I was saying folks have learned.
I'm not sensitive about men lusting after boobs. I'm sensitive about men lusting after children....which is what was reported by someone I trust (LuckyPink) to have been present.
Honestly, I don't play for the boob-loving team, so I hadn't been keeping tabs on the thread and had no idea what happened until all of DRAMAONTHEBOOBTHREAD new thread titles started appearing...and I admit curiosity got the best of me.
|
|
bvb
Social climber
flagstaff arizona
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 07:21pm PT
|
File under: Misinformed Reactionary. Footnotes should include Contempt Prior To Investigation.
|
|
drljefe
climber
El Presidio San Augustin del Tucson
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 07:37pm PT
|
On "THE" thread I saw photos of women who looked young, on purpose.
That sh!t is creepy but, unfortunately, legal.
To me, a kink stops being a kink when it goes there-
the sexualizing of girls and the whole "barely legal" thing.
It's not porn but it is f*#king creepy and I can see where people would be offended and even angry.
I was happy with fully clothed women with amazing breasts of all shapes and sizes.
And boobs ain't even my kink!
|
|
Jennie
Trad climber
Elk Creek, Idaho
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 09:03pm PT
|
A hypothetical question...
If a court could agree that a particular image suggests or invites taking
advantage of naivete'...the corrupting of innocence...or exploiting the trusting...
Should a model's 18 year certification validate and elevate the depiction above debauchery ??
|
|
Reilly
Mountain climber
The Other Monrovia- CA
|
|
|
Jan 26, 2013 - 09:07pm PT
|
Yeah, courts love words like 'should'.
|
|
|
SuperTopo on the Web
|
Let us know!